A Modified Eigenstructure Assignment Technique for Finite Element Model Updating

This article deals with an extended application of the constrained eigenstructure assignment method (CEAM) to finite element model updating. The existing formulation is modified to accommodate larger systems by developing a quadratic linear optimization procedure that is unconditionally stable. Furt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Ziaei-Rad, M. Imregun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 1996-01-01
Series:Shock and Vibration
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1996-3403
id doaj-cd29b6d6b07146ddbdd331c20ebc259f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cd29b6d6b07146ddbdd331c20ebc259f2020-11-24T20:57:08ZengHindawi LimitedShock and Vibration1070-96221875-92031996-01-013424725810.3233/SAV-1996-3403A Modified Eigenstructure Assignment Technique for Finite Element Model UpdatingS. Ziaei-Rad0M. Imregun1Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Mechanical Engineering Department, London SW7 2BX, UKImperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Mechanical Engineering Department, London SW7 2BX, UKThis article deals with an extended application of the constrained eigenstructure assignment method (CEAM) to finite element model updating. The existing formulation is modified to accommodate larger systems by developing a quadratic linear optimization procedure that is unconditionally stable. Further refinements include the updating of the mass matrix, a hysteretic damping model, and the introduction of elemental correction factors. Six numerical test cases, dealing with effects of damping and measurement noise, mode shape incompleteness, and discretization differences, were conducted in the case of a 3-D frame model with 114 coordinates. The performance of the CEAM was evaluated systematically for both the purpose of error location and the global correction of the initial model. The same cases were also studied using another model updating approach, namely the response function method (RFM). It was found that the CEAM had a number of distinct advantages, such as yielding a noniterative direct solution, requiring much less computing power, and providing acceptable results for cases, that could not he handled using the RFM.http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1996-3403
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Ziaei-Rad
M. Imregun
spellingShingle S. Ziaei-Rad
M. Imregun
A Modified Eigenstructure Assignment Technique for Finite Element Model Updating
Shock and Vibration
author_facet S. Ziaei-Rad
M. Imregun
author_sort S. Ziaei-Rad
title A Modified Eigenstructure Assignment Technique for Finite Element Model Updating
title_short A Modified Eigenstructure Assignment Technique for Finite Element Model Updating
title_full A Modified Eigenstructure Assignment Technique for Finite Element Model Updating
title_fullStr A Modified Eigenstructure Assignment Technique for Finite Element Model Updating
title_full_unstemmed A Modified Eigenstructure Assignment Technique for Finite Element Model Updating
title_sort modified eigenstructure assignment technique for finite element model updating
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Shock and Vibration
issn 1070-9622
1875-9203
publishDate 1996-01-01
description This article deals with an extended application of the constrained eigenstructure assignment method (CEAM) to finite element model updating. The existing formulation is modified to accommodate larger systems by developing a quadratic linear optimization procedure that is unconditionally stable. Further refinements include the updating of the mass matrix, a hysteretic damping model, and the introduction of elemental correction factors. Six numerical test cases, dealing with effects of damping and measurement noise, mode shape incompleteness, and discretization differences, were conducted in the case of a 3-D frame model with 114 coordinates. The performance of the CEAM was evaluated systematically for both the purpose of error location and the global correction of the initial model. The same cases were also studied using another model updating approach, namely the response function method (RFM). It was found that the CEAM had a number of distinct advantages, such as yielding a noniterative direct solution, requiring much less computing power, and providing acceptable results for cases, that could not he handled using the RFM.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SAV-1996-3403
work_keys_str_mv AT sziaeirad amodifiedeigenstructureassignmenttechniqueforfiniteelementmodelupdating
AT mimregun amodifiedeigenstructureassignmenttechniqueforfiniteelementmodelupdating
AT sziaeirad modifiedeigenstructureassignmenttechniqueforfiniteelementmodelupdating
AT mimregun modifiedeigenstructureassignmenttechniqueforfiniteelementmodelupdating
_version_ 1716788698742259712