A Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine Analgesia on the Duration of Labour

Background: A standard obstetric analgesic should have a good analgesic effect without reducing the intensity of uterine contraction. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intramuscular tramadol and pethidine on labor pain and duration. Material and Methods: A total of 170...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rozhan Yassin Khalil, Gashbin Kamal Faraj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences 2021-03-01
Series:Disease and Diagnosis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ddj.hums.ac.ir/PDF/ddj-10-1.pdf
id doaj-cccacd0b46b74e6ea0dff58a09af84d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cccacd0b46b74e6ea0dff58a09af84d12021-06-08T07:51:31ZengHormozgan University of Medical SciencesDisease and Diagnosis2717-32322021-03-011011610.34172/ddj.2021.01iejm-237A Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine Analgesia on the Duration of LabourRozhan Yassin Khalil0Gashbin Kamal Faraj1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, IraqKBMS Trainee, Sulaimani Maternity Teaching Hospital, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.Background: A standard obstetric analgesic should have a good analgesic effect without reducing the intensity of uterine contraction. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intramuscular tramadol and pethidine on labor pain and duration. Material and Methods: A total of 170 multigravida women in active labor were randomly assigned to two identical groups, so that 85 pregnant women received pethidine (50mg/2ml) and 85 pregnant women received tramadol (100mg/2ml) intramuscularly. Results: The labor duration in the tramadol group was shorter than in the pethidine group. In 1st stage of labor, 64.7% of the participants in the tramadol group received the drug for 120±30 minutes, while 67.1% in the pethidine group received the drug for 180±30 minutes. In the 2nd stage, 44.7% of the participants in the tramadol group received the drug for 15±5 minutes, while 51.8% in the pethidine group received the drug for 25±5 minutes. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used before, and 1 and 3 hours after drug administration. The pethidine group obtained a lower VAS mean score compared to those in the tramadol group at 1 hour after drug administration (4 vs 6; P≤.001). Moreover, there was a significant higher level of vomiting and dizziness among women in the pethidine group (29.4% vs 1.2%; P≤.001). Conclusion: Tramadol appears to lead to a shorter labor duration and cause lower maternal side-effects, although its analgesic efficacy was not as much as pethidine.https://ddj.hums.ac.ir/PDF/ddj-10-1.pdflabor durationpethidinerandomized trialtramadolvas score
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rozhan Yassin Khalil
Gashbin Kamal Faraj
spellingShingle Rozhan Yassin Khalil
Gashbin Kamal Faraj
A Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine Analgesia on the Duration of Labour
Disease and Diagnosis
labor duration
pethidine
randomized trial
tramadol
vas score
author_facet Rozhan Yassin Khalil
Gashbin Kamal Faraj
author_sort Rozhan Yassin Khalil
title A Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine Analgesia on the Duration of Labour
title_short A Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine Analgesia on the Duration of Labour
title_full A Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine Analgesia on the Duration of Labour
title_fullStr A Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine Analgesia on the Duration of Labour
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine Analgesia on the Duration of Labour
title_sort comparison of tramadol and pethidine analgesia on the duration of labour
publisher Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
series Disease and Diagnosis
issn 2717-3232
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Background: A standard obstetric analgesic should have a good analgesic effect without reducing the intensity of uterine contraction. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intramuscular tramadol and pethidine on labor pain and duration. Material and Methods: A total of 170 multigravida women in active labor were randomly assigned to two identical groups, so that 85 pregnant women received pethidine (50mg/2ml) and 85 pregnant women received tramadol (100mg/2ml) intramuscularly. Results: The labor duration in the tramadol group was shorter than in the pethidine group. In 1st stage of labor, 64.7% of the participants in the tramadol group received the drug for 120±30 minutes, while 67.1% in the pethidine group received the drug for 180±30 minutes. In the 2nd stage, 44.7% of the participants in the tramadol group received the drug for 15±5 minutes, while 51.8% in the pethidine group received the drug for 25±5 minutes. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used before, and 1 and 3 hours after drug administration. The pethidine group obtained a lower VAS mean score compared to those in the tramadol group at 1 hour after drug administration (4 vs 6; P≤.001). Moreover, there was a significant higher level of vomiting and dizziness among women in the pethidine group (29.4% vs 1.2%; P≤.001). Conclusion: Tramadol appears to lead to a shorter labor duration and cause lower maternal side-effects, although its analgesic efficacy was not as much as pethidine.
topic labor duration
pethidine
randomized trial
tramadol
vas score
url https://ddj.hums.ac.ir/PDF/ddj-10-1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rozhanyassinkhalil acomparisonoftramadolandpethidineanalgesiaonthedurationoflabour
AT gashbinkamalfaraj acomparisonoftramadolandpethidineanalgesiaonthedurationoflabour
AT rozhanyassinkhalil comparisonoftramadolandpethidineanalgesiaonthedurationoflabour
AT gashbinkamalfaraj comparisonoftramadolandpethidineanalgesiaonthedurationoflabour
_version_ 1721389877108408320