Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers

Different studies consider the possibility of including history of mathematics in the classroom. However, its inclusion in the teaching and learning of mathematics depends on the conceptions of it that teachers have, among other factors. This study displays a comparative analysis between the opinion...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María José Madrid, Alexander Maz-Machado, Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez, Carmen León-Mantero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/349
id doaj-ccb70c9a749c4063a161d1a855cf0f2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ccb70c9a749c4063a161d1a855cf0f2a2021-02-11T00:00:26ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902021-02-01934934910.3390/math9040349Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee TeachersMaría José Madrid0Alexander Maz-Machado1Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez2Carmen León-Mantero3Faculty of Education, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, SpainDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Cordoba, SpainFaculty of Economics and Business, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, SpainDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Cordoba, SpainDifferent studies consider the possibility of including history of mathematics in the classroom. However, its inclusion in the teaching and learning of mathematics depends on the conceptions of it that teachers have, among other factors. This study displays a comparative analysis between the opinions of primary education teachers-to-be and the opinions of mathematics teachers-to-be at secondary school and A-levels after the realization of an activity related to two historical or unusual multiplication methods. These trainee teachers were asked to identify the differences between these methods and the multiplication algorithm usually used in Spain. We collected these data and conducted an exploratory, descriptive and qualitative study. In order to analyse the information obtained, we used the technique content analysis. The answers given by these trainee teachers show their lack of knowledge about other multiplication methods and the various differences which they observed. These differences are mainly related to the structure of each method, the procedure and application of these methods and the mathematical processes carried out for each method. The comparison between the opinions of the teachers-to-be at different levels shows similarities but also some differences, probably due to the different mathematical knowledge they have.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/349history of mathematicsteacher trainingmultiplication methodsdidactics of mathematics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author María José Madrid
Alexander Maz-Machado
Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez
Carmen León-Mantero
spellingShingle María José Madrid
Alexander Maz-Machado
Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez
Carmen León-Mantero
Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers
Mathematics
history of mathematics
teacher training
multiplication methods
didactics of mathematics
author_facet María José Madrid
Alexander Maz-Machado
Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez
Carmen León-Mantero
author_sort María José Madrid
title Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers
title_short Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers
title_full Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers
title_fullStr Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers
title_sort comparison between a modern-day multiplication method and two historical ones by trainee teachers
publisher MDPI AG
series Mathematics
issn 2227-7390
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Different studies consider the possibility of including history of mathematics in the classroom. However, its inclusion in the teaching and learning of mathematics depends on the conceptions of it that teachers have, among other factors. This study displays a comparative analysis between the opinions of primary education teachers-to-be and the opinions of mathematics teachers-to-be at secondary school and A-levels after the realization of an activity related to two historical or unusual multiplication methods. These trainee teachers were asked to identify the differences between these methods and the multiplication algorithm usually used in Spain. We collected these data and conducted an exploratory, descriptive and qualitative study. In order to analyse the information obtained, we used the technique content analysis. The answers given by these trainee teachers show their lack of knowledge about other multiplication methods and the various differences which they observed. These differences are mainly related to the structure of each method, the procedure and application of these methods and the mathematical processes carried out for each method. The comparison between the opinions of the teachers-to-be at different levels shows similarities but also some differences, probably due to the different mathematical knowledge they have.
topic history of mathematics
teacher training
multiplication methods
didactics of mathematics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/349
work_keys_str_mv AT mariajosemadrid comparisonbetweenamoderndaymultiplicationmethodandtwohistoricalonesbytraineeteachers
AT alexandermazmachado comparisonbetweenamoderndaymultiplicationmethodandtwohistoricalonesbytraineeteachers
AT fernandoalmarazmenendez comparisonbetweenamoderndaymultiplicationmethodandtwohistoricalonesbytraineeteachers
AT carmenleonmantero comparisonbetweenamoderndaymultiplicationmethodandtwohistoricalonesbytraineeteachers
_version_ 1724275002186924032