Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers
Different studies consider the possibility of including history of mathematics in the classroom. However, its inclusion in the teaching and learning of mathematics depends on the conceptions of it that teachers have, among other factors. This study displays a comparative analysis between the opinion...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Mathematics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/349 |
id |
doaj-ccb70c9a749c4063a161d1a855cf0f2a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ccb70c9a749c4063a161d1a855cf0f2a2021-02-11T00:00:26ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902021-02-01934934910.3390/math9040349Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee TeachersMaría José Madrid0Alexander Maz-Machado1Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez2Carmen León-Mantero3Faculty of Education, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, SpainDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Cordoba, SpainFaculty of Economics and Business, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, SpainDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Cordoba, SpainDifferent studies consider the possibility of including history of mathematics in the classroom. However, its inclusion in the teaching and learning of mathematics depends on the conceptions of it that teachers have, among other factors. This study displays a comparative analysis between the opinions of primary education teachers-to-be and the opinions of mathematics teachers-to-be at secondary school and A-levels after the realization of an activity related to two historical or unusual multiplication methods. These trainee teachers were asked to identify the differences between these methods and the multiplication algorithm usually used in Spain. We collected these data and conducted an exploratory, descriptive and qualitative study. In order to analyse the information obtained, we used the technique content analysis. The answers given by these trainee teachers show their lack of knowledge about other multiplication methods and the various differences which they observed. These differences are mainly related to the structure of each method, the procedure and application of these methods and the mathematical processes carried out for each method. The comparison between the opinions of the teachers-to-be at different levels shows similarities but also some differences, probably due to the different mathematical knowledge they have.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/349history of mathematicsteacher trainingmultiplication methodsdidactics of mathematics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
María José Madrid Alexander Maz-Machado Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez Carmen León-Mantero |
spellingShingle |
María José Madrid Alexander Maz-Machado Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez Carmen León-Mantero Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers Mathematics history of mathematics teacher training multiplication methods didactics of mathematics |
author_facet |
María José Madrid Alexander Maz-Machado Fernando Almaraz-Menéndez Carmen León-Mantero |
author_sort |
María José Madrid |
title |
Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers |
title_short |
Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers |
title_full |
Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between a Modern-Day Multiplication Method and Two Historical Ones by Trainee Teachers |
title_sort |
comparison between a modern-day multiplication method and two historical ones by trainee teachers |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Mathematics |
issn |
2227-7390 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Different studies consider the possibility of including history of mathematics in the classroom. However, its inclusion in the teaching and learning of mathematics depends on the conceptions of it that teachers have, among other factors. This study displays a comparative analysis between the opinions of primary education teachers-to-be and the opinions of mathematics teachers-to-be at secondary school and A-levels after the realization of an activity related to two historical or unusual multiplication methods. These trainee teachers were asked to identify the differences between these methods and the multiplication algorithm usually used in Spain. We collected these data and conducted an exploratory, descriptive and qualitative study. In order to analyse the information obtained, we used the technique content analysis. The answers given by these trainee teachers show their lack of knowledge about other multiplication methods and the various differences which they observed. These differences are mainly related to the structure of each method, the procedure and application of these methods and the mathematical processes carried out for each method. The comparison between the opinions of the teachers-to-be at different levels shows similarities but also some differences, probably due to the different mathematical knowledge they have. |
topic |
history of mathematics teacher training multiplication methods didactics of mathematics |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/4/349 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariajosemadrid comparisonbetweenamoderndaymultiplicationmethodandtwohistoricalonesbytraineeteachers AT alexandermazmachado comparisonbetweenamoderndaymultiplicationmethodandtwohistoricalonesbytraineeteachers AT fernandoalmarazmenendez comparisonbetweenamoderndaymultiplicationmethodandtwohistoricalonesbytraineeteachers AT carmenleonmantero comparisonbetweenamoderndaymultiplicationmethodandtwohistoricalonesbytraineeteachers |
_version_ |
1724275002186924032 |