Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health

<strong>Background</strong> Deployment of electronic patient records (EPRs) is one of the primary goals of national NHS information technology (IT) initiatives. However, many systems come into disrepute through poor planning or design flaws, and media scrutiny focuses on these problems r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Meredith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2009-12-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/739
id doaj-ccb6a41e9ca84db0912be2ca5e9d0996
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ccb6a41e9ca84db0912be2ca5e9d09962020-11-24T22:30:22ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632009-12-0117420921310.14236/jhi.v17i4.739681Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental healthJohn Meredith<strong>Background</strong> Deployment of electronic patient records (EPRs) is one of the primary goals of national NHS information technology (IT) initiatives. However, many systems come into disrepute through poor planning or design flaws, and media scrutiny focuses on these problems rather than the potential gains. <strong>Objective</strong> To evaluate the deployment of an EPR in a community mental health setting. <strong>Method</strong> A validated user questionnaire was issued to all clinically qualified staff working in community mental health teams followed by interview and validation phases. The study encompassed both quantitative and qualitative mechanisms to establish the efficacy and usability of the system. <strong>Results</strong> The questionnaire had a response rate of 49.3%. Overall, the response was positive, with almost no extreme negative responses. Of respondents, 88.5% were satisfied with system accuracy, while 91.7% of responses indicated that data was made available in a timely manner. Of those surveyed, 88.7% agreed the system was 'worth the time and effort required to use it'. Additionally, electronic notes are used more frequently than paper-based equivalents. <strong>Conclusion</strong> The research concludes that the implemented system appears to offer a robust EPR that gives its users a high degree of satisfaction and provides tangible benefits to clinical staff.http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/739electronic patient recordevaluationmental health
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Meredith
spellingShingle John Meredith
Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
electronic patient record
evaluation
mental health
author_facet John Meredith
author_sort John Meredith
title Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health
title_short Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health
title_full Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health
title_fullStr Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health
title_full_unstemmed Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health
title_sort electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health
publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
series Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
issn 2058-4555
2058-4563
publishDate 2009-12-01
description <strong>Background</strong> Deployment of electronic patient records (EPRs) is one of the primary goals of national NHS information technology (IT) initiatives. However, many systems come into disrepute through poor planning or design flaws, and media scrutiny focuses on these problems rather than the potential gains. <strong>Objective</strong> To evaluate the deployment of an EPR in a community mental health setting. <strong>Method</strong> A validated user questionnaire was issued to all clinically qualified staff working in community mental health teams followed by interview and validation phases. The study encompassed both quantitative and qualitative mechanisms to establish the efficacy and usability of the system. <strong>Results</strong> The questionnaire had a response rate of 49.3%. Overall, the response was positive, with almost no extreme negative responses. Of respondents, 88.5% were satisfied with system accuracy, while 91.7% of responses indicated that data was made available in a timely manner. Of those surveyed, 88.7% agreed the system was 'worth the time and effort required to use it'. Additionally, electronic notes are used more frequently than paper-based equivalents. <strong>Conclusion</strong> The research concludes that the implemented system appears to offer a robust EPR that gives its users a high degree of satisfaction and provides tangible benefits to clinical staff.
topic electronic patient record
evaluation
mental health
url http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/739
work_keys_str_mv AT johnmeredith electronicpatientrecordevaluationincommunitymentalhealth
_version_ 1725741333647196160