Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health
<strong>Background</strong> Deployment of electronic patient records (EPRs) is one of the primary goals of national NHS information technology (IT) initiatives. However, many systems come into disrepute through poor planning or design flaws, and media scrutiny focuses on these problems r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
2009-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/739 |
id |
doaj-ccb6a41e9ca84db0912be2ca5e9d0996 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ccb6a41e9ca84db0912be2ca5e9d09962020-11-24T22:30:22ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632009-12-0117420921310.14236/jhi.v17i4.739681Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental healthJohn Meredith<strong>Background</strong> Deployment of electronic patient records (EPRs) is one of the primary goals of national NHS information technology (IT) initiatives. However, many systems come into disrepute through poor planning or design flaws, and media scrutiny focuses on these problems rather than the potential gains. <strong>Objective</strong> To evaluate the deployment of an EPR in a community mental health setting. <strong>Method</strong> A validated user questionnaire was issued to all clinically qualified staff working in community mental health teams followed by interview and validation phases. The study encompassed both quantitative and qualitative mechanisms to establish the efficacy and usability of the system. <strong>Results</strong> The questionnaire had a response rate of 49.3%. Overall, the response was positive, with almost no extreme negative responses. Of respondents, 88.5% were satisfied with system accuracy, while 91.7% of responses indicated that data was made available in a timely manner. Of those surveyed, 88.7% agreed the system was 'worth the time and effort required to use it'. Additionally, electronic notes are used more frequently than paper-based equivalents. <strong>Conclusion</strong> The research concludes that the implemented system appears to offer a robust EPR that gives its users a high degree of satisfaction and provides tangible benefits to clinical staff.http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/739electronic patient recordevaluationmental health |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
John Meredith |
spellingShingle |
John Meredith Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics electronic patient record evaluation mental health |
author_facet |
John Meredith |
author_sort |
John Meredith |
title |
Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health |
title_short |
Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health |
title_full |
Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health |
title_fullStr |
Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health |
title_full_unstemmed |
Electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health |
title_sort |
electronic patient record evaluation in community mental health |
publisher |
BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT |
series |
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics |
issn |
2058-4555 2058-4563 |
publishDate |
2009-12-01 |
description |
<strong>Background</strong> Deployment of electronic patient records (EPRs) is one of the primary goals of national NHS information technology (IT) initiatives. However, many systems come into disrepute through poor planning or design flaws, and media scrutiny focuses on these problems rather than the potential gains.
<strong>Objective</strong> To evaluate the deployment of an EPR in a community mental health setting.
<strong>Method</strong> A validated user questionnaire was issued to all clinically qualified staff working in community mental health teams followed by interview and validation phases. The study encompassed both quantitative and qualitative mechanisms to establish the efficacy and usability of the system.
<strong>Results</strong> The questionnaire had a response rate of 49.3%. Overall, the response was positive, with almost no extreme negative responses. Of respondents, 88.5% were satisfied with system accuracy, while 91.7% of responses indicated that data was made available in a timely manner. Of those surveyed, 88.7% agreed the system was 'worth the time and effort required to use it'. Additionally, electronic notes are used more frequently than paper-based equivalents.
<strong>Conclusion</strong> The research concludes that the implemented system appears to offer a robust EPR that gives its users a high degree of satisfaction and provides tangible benefits to clinical staff. |
topic |
electronic patient record evaluation mental health |
url |
http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/739 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johnmeredith electronicpatientrecordevaluationincommunitymentalhealth |
_version_ |
1725741333647196160 |