Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.

Microbial diseases are important selective agents in social insects and one major defense mechanism is the secretion of cuticular antimicrobial compounds. We hypothesized that given differences in group size, social complexity, and nest type the secretions of these antimicrobials will be under diffe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen J Hoggard, Peter D Wilson, Andrew J Beattie, Adam J Stow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21754998/?tool=EBI
id doaj-ccb44f92e80c45debdd2c31deafc4215
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ccb44f92e80c45debdd2c31deafc42152021-03-03T19:52:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0167e2176310.1371/journal.pone.0021763Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.Stephen J HoggardPeter D WilsonAndrew J BeattieAdam J StowMicrobial diseases are important selective agents in social insects and one major defense mechanism is the secretion of cuticular antimicrobial compounds. We hypothesized that given differences in group size, social complexity, and nest type the secretions of these antimicrobials will be under different selective pressures. To test this we extracted secretions from nine wasp species of varying social complexity and nesting habits and assayed their antimicrobial compounds against cultures of Staphylococcus aureus. These data were then combined with phylogenetic data to provide an evolutionary context. Social species showed significantly higher (18x) antimicrobial activity than solitary species and species with paper nests showed significantly higher (11x) antimicrobial activity than those which excavated burrows. Mud-nest species showed no antimicrobial activity. Solitary, burrow-provisioning wasps diverged at more basal nodes of the phylogenetic trees, while social wasps diverged from the most recent nodes. These data suggest that antimicrobial defences may have evolved in response to ground-dwelling pathogens but the most important variable leading to increased antimicrobial strength was increase in group size and social complexity.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21754998/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephen J Hoggard
Peter D Wilson
Andrew J Beattie
Adam J Stow
spellingShingle Stephen J Hoggard
Peter D Wilson
Andrew J Beattie
Adam J Stow
Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stephen J Hoggard
Peter D Wilson
Andrew J Beattie
Adam J Stow
author_sort Stephen J Hoggard
title Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.
title_short Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.
title_full Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.
title_fullStr Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.
title_full_unstemmed Social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.
title_sort social complexity and nesting habits are factors in the evolution of antimicrobial defences in wasps.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Microbial diseases are important selective agents in social insects and one major defense mechanism is the secretion of cuticular antimicrobial compounds. We hypothesized that given differences in group size, social complexity, and nest type the secretions of these antimicrobials will be under different selective pressures. To test this we extracted secretions from nine wasp species of varying social complexity and nesting habits and assayed their antimicrobial compounds against cultures of Staphylococcus aureus. These data were then combined with phylogenetic data to provide an evolutionary context. Social species showed significantly higher (18x) antimicrobial activity than solitary species and species with paper nests showed significantly higher (11x) antimicrobial activity than those which excavated burrows. Mud-nest species showed no antimicrobial activity. Solitary, burrow-provisioning wasps diverged at more basal nodes of the phylogenetic trees, while social wasps diverged from the most recent nodes. These data suggest that antimicrobial defences may have evolved in response to ground-dwelling pathogens but the most important variable leading to increased antimicrobial strength was increase in group size and social complexity.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21754998/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenjhoggard socialcomplexityandnestinghabitsarefactorsintheevolutionofantimicrobialdefencesinwasps
AT peterdwilson socialcomplexityandnestinghabitsarefactorsintheevolutionofantimicrobialdefencesinwasps
AT andrewjbeattie socialcomplexityandnestinghabitsarefactorsintheevolutionofantimicrobialdefencesinwasps
AT adamjstow socialcomplexityandnestinghabitsarefactorsintheevolutionofantimicrobialdefencesinwasps
_version_ 1714825233596153856