Uses of Reason and Human Destinies within the Political Sphere. I. Kant and M. Mendelssohn
The paper draws upon two texts authored by Moses Mendelssohn and Immanuel Kant. They both address the question on the meaning and significance of Aufklärung raised by Berlinische Monatsschrift (1783-1784). Seemingly, the main theoretical point of Enlightenment is the relation between freedom and aut...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Facultatea de Stiinte Politice, SNSPA
2012-02-01
|
Series: | Sfera Politicii |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sferapoliticii.ro/sfera/167/art06-Dragusin.php |
Summary: | The paper draws upon two texts authored by Moses Mendelssohn and Immanuel Kant. They both address the question on the meaning and significance of Aufklärung raised by Berlinische Monatsschrift (1783-1784). Seemingly, the main theoretical point of Enlightenment is the relation between freedom and authority, particularily between individual subject (as man and as citizen) and political sovereign (the King). The paper argues that the solutions they advance to this relation have a two-fold impact on the political (read public) sphere: conservative in the case of M. Mendelssohn and subversive (even revolutionary) in I. Kant’s case. The conservative impact means keeping the status-quo whereas the subversive impact steps beyond political sphere to public one. In the public sphere each individual will be defined more through the use of public reason. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1221-6720 |