Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument
Abstract Background To explore and better understand how patients evaluate satisfaction in dental care and elicit information from them to develop a dental satisfaction instrument. Methods Patients currently receiving dental treatment in a teaching hospital were invited to be part of a qualitative r...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Oral Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-018-0477-7 |
id |
doaj-cca6a94821df4af68bf37ceefdb0e835 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cca6a94821df4af68bf37ceefdb0e8352020-11-25T01:28:27ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312018-01-0118111010.1186/s12903-018-0477-7Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrumentJennifer Yu Ning Luo0Pearl Pei Liu1May Chun Mei Wong2Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong KongDental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong KongDental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong KongAbstract Background To explore and better understand how patients evaluate satisfaction in dental care and elicit information from them to develop a dental satisfaction instrument. Methods Patients currently receiving dental treatment in a teaching hospital were invited to be part of a qualitative research project which involved focus group discussion. Focus groups were conducted in Cantonese and discussions were recorded (audio and video) and later transcribed. Results Thirty patients participated and a thematic analysis of data from four focus groups helped generate a questionnaire on dental satisfaction. Six themes were extracted from the contents of the focus group: (i) attitude, (ii) cost, (iii) convenience, (iv) pain management, (v) quality, and (vi) patients’ perceived need for prevention of oral disease. Compared to the existing Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire (DSQ), majority of the dental satisfaction aspects mentioned in focus group discussions were similar to items in DSQ supporting its content validity. Focus groups covered more aspects including attitude of dental supporting staff, convenience of emergency services, admission of patients and treatment duration. Consideration of the clinical skills of the operator, hospital infection control, and knowledge on prevention of oral disease were also expressed. Conclusions The focus group discussions elicited the views of patients not covered by DSQ items thereby suggesting areas for development of a new satisfaction questionnaire.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-018-0477-7Dental careSatisfactionOutcome assessmentQualitative study |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jennifer Yu Ning Luo Pearl Pei Liu May Chun Mei Wong |
spellingShingle |
Jennifer Yu Ning Luo Pearl Pei Liu May Chun Mei Wong Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument BMC Oral Health Dental care Satisfaction Outcome assessment Qualitative study |
author_facet |
Jennifer Yu Ning Luo Pearl Pei Liu May Chun Mei Wong |
author_sort |
Jennifer Yu Ning Luo |
title |
Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument |
title_short |
Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument |
title_full |
Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument |
title_fullStr |
Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument |
title_sort |
patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Oral Health |
issn |
1472-6831 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Background To explore and better understand how patients evaluate satisfaction in dental care and elicit information from them to develop a dental satisfaction instrument. Methods Patients currently receiving dental treatment in a teaching hospital were invited to be part of a qualitative research project which involved focus group discussion. Focus groups were conducted in Cantonese and discussions were recorded (audio and video) and later transcribed. Results Thirty patients participated and a thematic analysis of data from four focus groups helped generate a questionnaire on dental satisfaction. Six themes were extracted from the contents of the focus group: (i) attitude, (ii) cost, (iii) convenience, (iv) pain management, (v) quality, and (vi) patients’ perceived need for prevention of oral disease. Compared to the existing Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire (DSQ), majority of the dental satisfaction aspects mentioned in focus group discussions were similar to items in DSQ supporting its content validity. Focus groups covered more aspects including attitude of dental supporting staff, convenience of emergency services, admission of patients and treatment duration. Consideration of the clinical skills of the operator, hospital infection control, and knowledge on prevention of oral disease were also expressed. Conclusions The focus group discussions elicited the views of patients not covered by DSQ items thereby suggesting areas for development of a new satisfaction questionnaire. |
topic |
Dental care Satisfaction Outcome assessment Qualitative study |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-018-0477-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jenniferyuningluo patientssatisfactionwithdentalcareaqualitativestudytodevelopasatisfactioninstrument AT pearlpeiliu patientssatisfactionwithdentalcareaqualitativestudytodevelopasatisfactioninstrument AT maychunmeiwong patientssatisfactionwithdentalcareaqualitativestudytodevelopasatisfactioninstrument |
_version_ |
1725101628494708736 |