Wissen oder Sprache? Für eine wissensanalytische Profilierung der Diskursforschung

This contribution starts with a critical discussion of recent work on discourse theory and analysis in historical research by Achim Landwehr and Philipp Sarasin. It argues against both a study of language bias in discourse research, as proposed by Landwehr, and the notion of ›discourse theory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reiner Keller
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: StudienVerlag 2005-12-01
Series:Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
Online Access:https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/4083
id doaj-cca4fb654ec74a8eb7e1feecec97a7cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cca4fb654ec74a8eb7e1feecec97a7cf2021-03-18T20:47:36ZdeuStudienVerlagÖsterreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften1016-765X2707-966X2005-12-0116410.25365/oezg-2005-16-4-2Wissen oder Sprache? Für eine wissensanalytische Profilierung der DiskursforschungReiner Keller0Lehrstuhl für Soziologie der Universität Augsburg This contribution starts with a critical discussion of recent work on discourse theory and analysis in historical research by Achim Landwehr and Philipp Sarasin. It argues against both a study of language bias in discourse research, as proposed by Landwehr, and the notion of ›discourse theory as philosophical attitude‹ put forward by Sarasin. The article then outlines a research programme for discourse analysis, which can be termed the ›sociology of knowledge approach to discourse‹ (wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse). Such an approach may also prove useful for historical discourse research too. Going beyond questions of language, the sociology of knowledge approach to discourse looks at social relations and the politics of knowledge, as well as the discursive construction of reality as a ›material‹ process. This approach to discourse integrates insights from Foucault’s theories of discourse into interpretative paradigms from the social sciences, especially the ›German‹ approach to the sociology of knowledge. Furthermore, it combines research questions focused on the concept of ›discourse‹ with methods drawn from qualitative social research. The author advocates the use of analytical concepts from the sociology of knowledge, such as interpretative frameworks, classification systems, phenomenological and narrative structures, and the use of methodological strategies from ›grounded theory‹. https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/4083
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reiner Keller
spellingShingle Reiner Keller
Wissen oder Sprache? Für eine wissensanalytische Profilierung der Diskursforschung
Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
author_facet Reiner Keller
author_sort Reiner Keller
title Wissen oder Sprache? Für eine wissensanalytische Profilierung der Diskursforschung
title_short Wissen oder Sprache? Für eine wissensanalytische Profilierung der Diskursforschung
title_full Wissen oder Sprache? Für eine wissensanalytische Profilierung der Diskursforschung
title_fullStr Wissen oder Sprache? Für eine wissensanalytische Profilierung der Diskursforschung
title_full_unstemmed Wissen oder Sprache? Für eine wissensanalytische Profilierung der Diskursforschung
title_sort wissen oder sprache? für eine wissensanalytische profilierung der diskursforschung
publisher StudienVerlag
series Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften
issn 1016-765X
2707-966X
publishDate 2005-12-01
description This contribution starts with a critical discussion of recent work on discourse theory and analysis in historical research by Achim Landwehr and Philipp Sarasin. It argues against both a study of language bias in discourse research, as proposed by Landwehr, and the notion of ›discourse theory as philosophical attitude‹ put forward by Sarasin. The article then outlines a research programme for discourse analysis, which can be termed the ›sociology of knowledge approach to discourse‹ (wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse). Such an approach may also prove useful for historical discourse research too. Going beyond questions of language, the sociology of knowledge approach to discourse looks at social relations and the politics of knowledge, as well as the discursive construction of reality as a ›material‹ process. This approach to discourse integrates insights from Foucault’s theories of discourse into interpretative paradigms from the social sciences, especially the ›German‹ approach to the sociology of knowledge. Furthermore, it combines research questions focused on the concept of ›discourse‹ with methods drawn from qualitative social research. The author advocates the use of analytical concepts from the sociology of knowledge, such as interpretative frameworks, classification systems, phenomenological and narrative structures, and the use of methodological strategies from ›grounded theory‹.
url https://journals.univie.ac.at/index.php/oezg/article/view/4083
work_keys_str_mv AT reinerkeller wissenodersprachefureinewissensanalytischeprofilierungderdiskursforschung
_version_ 1724215191451729920