Investigation of Moving Beds for Heat Recovery from Solid Granular

Moving beds have been regarded as a promising alternative for the heat recovery from the gravity-driven granular flow, which includes counter-current moving bed (CCMB) and gravity-driven moving bed (GDMB). However, the heat transfer characteristics still deserve investigating to optimise the direct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhigang Guo, Xing Tian, Shang Zhang, Jian Yang, Qiuwang Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2020-08-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11050
id doaj-cca24741bf3e4e87a37afbd5084c7705
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cca24741bf3e4e87a37afbd5084c77052021-02-16T11:27:58ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162020-08-018110.3303/CET2081109Investigation of Moving Beds for Heat Recovery from Solid GranularZhigang GuoXing TianShang ZhangJian YangQiuwang WangMoving beds have been regarded as a promising alternative for the heat recovery from the gravity-driven granular flow, which includes counter-current moving bed (CCMB) and gravity-driven moving bed (GDMB). However, the heat transfer characteristics still deserve investigating to optimise the direct heat transfer (CCMB) and the indirect transfer (GDMB), particularly for the appropriate particle size in different moving beds. In this paper, the simple analytical models were established to compare CCMB and GDMB in different particle sizes, which was interwoven with the effects of solid granular density, thermal conductivity, the inlet temperature. It was found that, as the technology significantly affected by the solid-to-gas ratio of mass flow rate, CCMB enables the efficient heat recovery for the particles larger than 3 – 4 mm. For the other fine solid granular, GDMB becomes a good candidate once there is enough heat transfer area, fins in the airside and particles mixing in the granular side. It has more advantages in the quick flow with the compact design. The study can provide useful suggestions for improvement and optimisation in the future.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11050
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhigang Guo
Xing Tian
Shang Zhang
Jian Yang
Qiuwang Wang
spellingShingle Zhigang Guo
Xing Tian
Shang Zhang
Jian Yang
Qiuwang Wang
Investigation of Moving Beds for Heat Recovery from Solid Granular
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet Zhigang Guo
Xing Tian
Shang Zhang
Jian Yang
Qiuwang Wang
author_sort Zhigang Guo
title Investigation of Moving Beds for Heat Recovery from Solid Granular
title_short Investigation of Moving Beds for Heat Recovery from Solid Granular
title_full Investigation of Moving Beds for Heat Recovery from Solid Granular
title_fullStr Investigation of Moving Beds for Heat Recovery from Solid Granular
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Moving Beds for Heat Recovery from Solid Granular
title_sort investigation of moving beds for heat recovery from solid granular
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Moving beds have been regarded as a promising alternative for the heat recovery from the gravity-driven granular flow, which includes counter-current moving bed (CCMB) and gravity-driven moving bed (GDMB). However, the heat transfer characteristics still deserve investigating to optimise the direct heat transfer (CCMB) and the indirect transfer (GDMB), particularly for the appropriate particle size in different moving beds. In this paper, the simple analytical models were established to compare CCMB and GDMB in different particle sizes, which was interwoven with the effects of solid granular density, thermal conductivity, the inlet temperature. It was found that, as the technology significantly affected by the solid-to-gas ratio of mass flow rate, CCMB enables the efficient heat recovery for the particles larger than 3 – 4 mm. For the other fine solid granular, GDMB becomes a good candidate once there is enough heat transfer area, fins in the airside and particles mixing in the granular side. It has more advantages in the quick flow with the compact design. The study can provide useful suggestions for improvement and optimisation in the future.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11050
work_keys_str_mv AT zhigangguo investigationofmovingbedsforheatrecoveryfromsolidgranular
AT xingtian investigationofmovingbedsforheatrecoveryfromsolidgranular
AT shangzhang investigationofmovingbedsforheatrecoveryfromsolidgranular
AT jianyang investigationofmovingbedsforheatrecoveryfromsolidgranular
AT qiuwangwang investigationofmovingbedsforheatrecoveryfromsolidgranular
_version_ 1724267720338309120