Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia
Introduction People receiving haemodialysis experience a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing in nephrology care, however their acceptability, utility and impacts are not well understood.Methods and analysis We describe...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-11-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e039014.full |
id |
doaj-cc9f11180c2d43abb1315e3b118125d9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cc9f11180c2d43abb1315e3b118125d92021-06-25T12:32:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-11-01101110.1136/bmjopen-2020-039014Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in AustraliaSuetonia Palmer0Rachael L Morton1Stephen P McDonald2Shilpanjali Jesudason3Andrea Viecelli4Emily Duncanson5Paul N Bennett6Kathryn Dansie7William Handke8Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New ZealandNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, AustraliaAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaCentral and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Services (CNARTS), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaSchool of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, AustraliaAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaFaculty of Health Medicine Nursing and Behavioural Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, AustraliaAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaConsumer representative, Private citizen, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaIntroduction People receiving haemodialysis experience a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing in nephrology care, however their acceptability, utility and impacts are not well understood.Methods and analysis We describe a protocol for a qualitative study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of electronic-PROMs (e-PROMs) data capture and feedback in haemodialysis following the pilot Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT). SWIFT involves linkage of e-PROMs data, including symptoms and health-related quality of life, to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry with feedback to patients’ treating nephrologists and nurse unit managers. Focus groups and semistructured interviews will be conducted with nephrologists (n=15), dialysis nurses (n=24) and patients receiving haemodialysis (n=24) from six dialysis units in Australia. Question topics will include the technical and clinical feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs reporting and feedback (including the barriers and enablers to uptake) and perceived impact on patient care and outcomes. Transcripts will be analysed thematically and guided by Normalisation Process Theory.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the relevant hospital Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC/18/CALHN/481; HREC/MML/54599). The findings from the SWIFT pilot and qualitative evaluation will inform the implementation of the SWIFT main trial, and more broadly, the use of e-PROMs in clinical settings and registries.Trial registration number ANZCTRN12618001976279.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e039014.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suetonia Palmer Rachael L Morton Stephen P McDonald Shilpanjali Jesudason Andrea Viecelli Emily Duncanson Paul N Bennett Kathryn Dansie William Handke |
spellingShingle |
Suetonia Palmer Rachael L Morton Stephen P McDonald Shilpanjali Jesudason Andrea Viecelli Emily Duncanson Paul N Bennett Kathryn Dansie William Handke Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia BMJ Open |
author_facet |
Suetonia Palmer Rachael L Morton Stephen P McDonald Shilpanjali Jesudason Andrea Viecelli Emily Duncanson Paul N Bennett Kathryn Dansie William Handke |
author_sort |
Suetonia Palmer |
title |
Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia |
title_short |
Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia |
title_full |
Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia |
title_fullStr |
Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia |
title_sort |
feasibility and acceptability of e-proms data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the symptom monitoring with feedback trial (swift) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in australia |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
BMJ Open |
issn |
2044-6055 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Introduction People receiving haemodialysis experience a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing in nephrology care, however their acceptability, utility and impacts are not well understood.Methods and analysis We describe a protocol for a qualitative study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of electronic-PROMs (e-PROMs) data capture and feedback in haemodialysis following the pilot Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT). SWIFT involves linkage of e-PROMs data, including symptoms and health-related quality of life, to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry with feedback to patients’ treating nephrologists and nurse unit managers. Focus groups and semistructured interviews will be conducted with nephrologists (n=15), dialysis nurses (n=24) and patients receiving haemodialysis (n=24) from six dialysis units in Australia. Question topics will include the technical and clinical feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs reporting and feedback (including the barriers and enablers to uptake) and perceived impact on patient care and outcomes. Transcripts will be analysed thematically and guided by Normalisation Process Theory.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the relevant hospital Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC/18/CALHN/481; HREC/MML/54599). The findings from the SWIFT pilot and qualitative evaluation will inform the implementation of the SWIFT main trial, and more broadly, the use of e-PROMs in clinical settings and registries.Trial registration number ANZCTRN12618001976279. |
url |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e039014.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suetoniapalmer feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia AT rachaellmorton feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia AT stephenpmcdonald feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia AT shilpanjalijesudason feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia AT andreaviecelli feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia AT emilyduncanson feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia AT paulnbennett feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia AT kathryndansie feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia AT williamhandke feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia |
_version_ |
1721359830565781504 |