Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia

Introduction People receiving haemodialysis experience a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing in nephrology care, however their acceptability, utility and impacts are not well understood.Methods and analysis We describe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Suetonia Palmer, Rachael L Morton, Stephen P McDonald, Shilpanjali Jesudason, Andrea Viecelli, Emily Duncanson, Paul N Bennett, Kathryn Dansie, William Handke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e039014.full
id doaj-cc9f11180c2d43abb1315e3b118125d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc9f11180c2d43abb1315e3b118125d92021-06-25T12:32:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-11-01101110.1136/bmjopen-2020-039014Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in AustraliaSuetonia Palmer0Rachael L Morton1Stephen P McDonald2Shilpanjali Jesudason3Andrea Viecelli4Emily Duncanson5Paul N Bennett6Kathryn Dansie7William Handke8Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New ZealandNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, AustraliaAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaCentral and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Services (CNARTS), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaSchool of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, AustraliaAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaFaculty of Health Medicine Nursing and Behavioural Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, AustraliaAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaConsumer representative, Private citizen, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaIntroduction People receiving haemodialysis experience a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing in nephrology care, however their acceptability, utility and impacts are not well understood.Methods and analysis We describe a protocol for a qualitative study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of electronic-PROMs (e-PROMs) data capture and feedback in haemodialysis following the pilot Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT). SWIFT involves linkage of e-PROMs data, including symptoms and health-related quality of life, to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry with feedback to patients’ treating nephrologists and nurse unit managers. Focus groups and semistructured interviews will be conducted with nephrologists (n=15), dialysis nurses (n=24) and patients receiving haemodialysis (n=24) from six dialysis units in Australia. Question topics will include the technical and clinical feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs reporting and feedback (including the barriers and enablers to uptake) and perceived impact on patient care and outcomes. Transcripts will be analysed thematically and guided by Normalisation Process Theory.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the relevant hospital Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC/18/CALHN/481; HREC/MML/54599). The findings from the SWIFT pilot and qualitative evaluation will inform the implementation of the SWIFT main trial, and more broadly, the use of e-PROMs in clinical settings and registries.Trial registration number ANZCTRN12618001976279.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e039014.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suetonia Palmer
Rachael L Morton
Stephen P McDonald
Shilpanjali Jesudason
Andrea Viecelli
Emily Duncanson
Paul N Bennett
Kathryn Dansie
William Handke
spellingShingle Suetonia Palmer
Rachael L Morton
Stephen P McDonald
Shilpanjali Jesudason
Andrea Viecelli
Emily Duncanson
Paul N Bennett
Kathryn Dansie
William Handke
Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia
BMJ Open
author_facet Suetonia Palmer
Rachael L Morton
Stephen P McDonald
Shilpanjali Jesudason
Andrea Viecelli
Emily Duncanson
Paul N Bennett
Kathryn Dansie
William Handke
author_sort Suetonia Palmer
title Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia
title_short Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia
title_full Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia
title_fullStr Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia
title_sort feasibility and acceptability of e-proms data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the symptom monitoring with feedback trial (swift) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in australia
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Introduction People receiving haemodialysis experience a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasing in nephrology care, however their acceptability, utility and impacts are not well understood.Methods and analysis We describe a protocol for a qualitative study to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of electronic-PROMs (e-PROMs) data capture and feedback in haemodialysis following the pilot Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT). SWIFT involves linkage of e-PROMs data, including symptoms and health-related quality of life, to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry with feedback to patients’ treating nephrologists and nurse unit managers. Focus groups and semistructured interviews will be conducted with nephrologists (n=15), dialysis nurses (n=24) and patients receiving haemodialysis (n=24) from six dialysis units in Australia. Question topics will include the technical and clinical feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs reporting and feedback (including the barriers and enablers to uptake) and perceived impact on patient care and outcomes. Transcripts will be analysed thematically and guided by Normalisation Process Theory.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the relevant hospital Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC/18/CALHN/481; HREC/MML/54599). The findings from the SWIFT pilot and qualitative evaluation will inform the implementation of the SWIFT main trial, and more broadly, the use of e-PROMs in clinical settings and registries.Trial registration number ANZCTRN12618001976279.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e039014.full
work_keys_str_mv AT suetoniapalmer feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
AT rachaellmorton feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
AT stephenpmcdonald feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
AT shilpanjalijesudason feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
AT andreaviecelli feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
AT emilyduncanson feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
AT paulnbennett feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
AT kathryndansie feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
AT williamhandke feasibilityandacceptabilityofepromsdatacaptureandfeedbackamongpatientsreceivinghaemodialysisinthesymptommonitoringwithfeedbacktrialswiftpilotprotocolforaqualitativestudyinaustralia
_version_ 1721359830565781504