Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography
Abstract Background Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a markedly increased mortality risk. Different definitions of AKI are in use, leading to varying prevalence and outcome measurements. The aim of the prese...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Cardiovascular Disorders |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01985-9 |
id |
doaj-cc8a6ba64d5441d1bd22a4ba035d3cc9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cc8a6ba64d5441d1bd22a4ba035d3cc92021-04-18T11:27:10ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612021-04-012111910.1186/s12872-021-01985-9Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiographyMaren Weferling0Christoph Liebetrau1Daniel Kraus2Philipp Zierentz3Beatrice von Jeinsen4Oliver Dörr5Michael Weber6Holger Nef7Christian W. Hamm8Till Keller9Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterMedical Department I, Nephrology, University of MainzMedical Department I, Cardiology, University of GiessenDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Hospital Darmstadt-DieburgDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterAbstract Background Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a markedly increased mortality risk. Different definitions of AKI are in use, leading to varying prevalence and outcome measurements. The aim of the present study is to analyze an ACS population undergoing coronary angiography for differences in AKI prevalence and outcome using four established AKI definitions. Methods 944 patients (30% female) were enrolled in a prospective registry between 2003 and 2005 with 6-month all-cause mortality as outcome measure. Four established AKI definitions were used: an increase in serum creatinine (sCR) ≥ 1.5 fold, ≥ 0.3 mg/dl, and ≥ 0.5 mg/dl and a decrease in eGFR > 25% from baseline (AKIN 1, AKIN 2, CIN, and RIFLE definition groups, respectively). Results AKI rates varied widely between the different groups. Using the CIN definition, AKI frequency was lowest (4.4%), whereas it was highest if the RIFLE definition was applied (13.2%). AKIN 2 displayed a twofold higher AKI prevalence compared with AKIN 1 (10.2% vs. 5.3% (p < 0.001)). AKI was a strong risk factor for mid-term mortality, with distinctive variability between the definitions. The lowest mortality risk was found in the RIFLE group (HR 6.0; 95% CI 3.7–10.0; p < 0.001), whereas CIN revealed the highest risk (HR 16.7; 95% CI 9.9–28.1; p < 0.001). Conclusion Prevalence and outcome in ACS patients varied considerably depending on the AKI definition applied. To define patients with highest renal function-associated mortality risk, use of the CIN definition seems to have the highest prognostic relevance.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01985-9 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maren Weferling Christoph Liebetrau Daniel Kraus Philipp Zierentz Beatrice von Jeinsen Oliver Dörr Michael Weber Holger Nef Christian W. Hamm Till Keller |
spellingShingle |
Maren Weferling Christoph Liebetrau Daniel Kraus Philipp Zierentz Beatrice von Jeinsen Oliver Dörr Michael Weber Holger Nef Christian W. Hamm Till Keller Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography BMC Cardiovascular Disorders |
author_facet |
Maren Weferling Christoph Liebetrau Daniel Kraus Philipp Zierentz Beatrice von Jeinsen Oliver Dörr Michael Weber Holger Nef Christian W. Hamm Till Keller |
author_sort |
Maren Weferling |
title |
Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography |
title_short |
Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography |
title_full |
Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography |
title_fullStr |
Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography |
title_full_unstemmed |
Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography |
title_sort |
definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in acs patients undergoing coronary angiography |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders |
issn |
1471-2261 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a markedly increased mortality risk. Different definitions of AKI are in use, leading to varying prevalence and outcome measurements. The aim of the present study is to analyze an ACS population undergoing coronary angiography for differences in AKI prevalence and outcome using four established AKI definitions. Methods 944 patients (30% female) were enrolled in a prospective registry between 2003 and 2005 with 6-month all-cause mortality as outcome measure. Four established AKI definitions were used: an increase in serum creatinine (sCR) ≥ 1.5 fold, ≥ 0.3 mg/dl, and ≥ 0.5 mg/dl and a decrease in eGFR > 25% from baseline (AKIN 1, AKIN 2, CIN, and RIFLE definition groups, respectively). Results AKI rates varied widely between the different groups. Using the CIN definition, AKI frequency was lowest (4.4%), whereas it was highest if the RIFLE definition was applied (13.2%). AKIN 2 displayed a twofold higher AKI prevalence compared with AKIN 1 (10.2% vs. 5.3% (p < 0.001)). AKI was a strong risk factor for mid-term mortality, with distinctive variability between the definitions. The lowest mortality risk was found in the RIFLE group (HR 6.0; 95% CI 3.7–10.0; p < 0.001), whereas CIN revealed the highest risk (HR 16.7; 95% CI 9.9–28.1; p < 0.001). Conclusion Prevalence and outcome in ACS patients varied considerably depending on the AKI definition applied. To define patients with highest renal function-associated mortality risk, use of the CIN definition seems to have the highest prognostic relevance. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01985-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marenweferling definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT christophliebetrau definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT danielkraus definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT philippzierentz definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT beatricevonjeinsen definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT oliverdorr definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT michaelweber definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT holgernef definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT christianwhamm definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography AT tillkeller definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography |
_version_ |
1721522319514402816 |