Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography

Abstract Background Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a markedly increased mortality risk. Different definitions of AKI are in use, leading to varying prevalence and outcome measurements. The aim of the prese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maren Weferling, Christoph Liebetrau, Daniel Kraus, Philipp Zierentz, Beatrice von Jeinsen, Oliver Dörr, Michael Weber, Holger Nef, Christian W. Hamm, Till Keller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-04-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01985-9
id doaj-cc8a6ba64d5441d1bd22a4ba035d3cc9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc8a6ba64d5441d1bd22a4ba035d3cc92021-04-18T11:27:10ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612021-04-012111910.1186/s12872-021-01985-9Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiographyMaren Weferling0Christoph Liebetrau1Daniel Kraus2Philipp Zierentz3Beatrice von Jeinsen4Oliver Dörr5Michael Weber6Holger Nef7Christian W. Hamm8Till Keller9Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterMedical Department I, Nephrology, University of MainzMedical Department I, Cardiology, University of GiessenDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Hospital Darmstadt-DieburgDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax CenterAbstract Background Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a markedly increased mortality risk. Different definitions of AKI are in use, leading to varying prevalence and outcome measurements. The aim of the present study is to analyze an ACS population undergoing coronary angiography for differences in AKI prevalence and outcome using four established AKI definitions. Methods 944 patients (30% female) were enrolled in a prospective registry between 2003 and 2005 with 6-month all-cause mortality as outcome measure. Four established AKI definitions were used: an increase in serum creatinine (sCR) ≥ 1.5 fold, ≥ 0.3 mg/dl, and ≥ 0.5 mg/dl and a decrease in eGFR > 25% from baseline (AKIN 1, AKIN 2, CIN, and RIFLE definition groups, respectively). Results AKI rates varied widely between the different groups. Using the CIN definition, AKI frequency was lowest (4.4%), whereas it was highest if the RIFLE definition was applied (13.2%). AKIN 2 displayed a twofold higher AKI prevalence compared with AKIN 1 (10.2% vs. 5.3% (p < 0.001)). AKI was a strong risk factor for mid-term mortality, with distinctive variability between the definitions. The lowest mortality risk was found in the RIFLE group (HR 6.0; 95% CI 3.7–10.0; p < 0.001), whereas CIN revealed the highest risk (HR 16.7; 95% CI 9.9–28.1; p < 0.001). Conclusion Prevalence and outcome in ACS patients varied considerably depending on the AKI definition applied. To define patients with highest renal function-associated mortality risk, use of the CIN definition seems to have the highest prognostic relevance.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01985-9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maren Weferling
Christoph Liebetrau
Daniel Kraus
Philipp Zierentz
Beatrice von Jeinsen
Oliver Dörr
Michael Weber
Holger Nef
Christian W. Hamm
Till Keller
spellingShingle Maren Weferling
Christoph Liebetrau
Daniel Kraus
Philipp Zierentz
Beatrice von Jeinsen
Oliver Dörr
Michael Weber
Holger Nef
Christian W. Hamm
Till Keller
Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
author_facet Maren Weferling
Christoph Liebetrau
Daniel Kraus
Philipp Zierentz
Beatrice von Jeinsen
Oliver Dörr
Michael Weber
Holger Nef
Christian W. Hamm
Till Keller
author_sort Maren Weferling
title Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography
title_short Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography
title_full Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography
title_fullStr Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography
title_full_unstemmed Definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography
title_sort definition of acute kidney injury impacts prevalence and prognosis in acs patients undergoing coronary angiography
publisher BMC
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
issn 1471-2261
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Background Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with a markedly increased mortality risk. Different definitions of AKI are in use, leading to varying prevalence and outcome measurements. The aim of the present study is to analyze an ACS population undergoing coronary angiography for differences in AKI prevalence and outcome using four established AKI definitions. Methods 944 patients (30% female) were enrolled in a prospective registry between 2003 and 2005 with 6-month all-cause mortality as outcome measure. Four established AKI definitions were used: an increase in serum creatinine (sCR) ≥ 1.5 fold, ≥ 0.3 mg/dl, and ≥ 0.5 mg/dl and a decrease in eGFR > 25% from baseline (AKIN 1, AKIN 2, CIN, and RIFLE definition groups, respectively). Results AKI rates varied widely between the different groups. Using the CIN definition, AKI frequency was lowest (4.4%), whereas it was highest if the RIFLE definition was applied (13.2%). AKIN 2 displayed a twofold higher AKI prevalence compared with AKIN 1 (10.2% vs. 5.3% (p < 0.001)). AKI was a strong risk factor for mid-term mortality, with distinctive variability between the definitions. The lowest mortality risk was found in the RIFLE group (HR 6.0; 95% CI 3.7–10.0; p < 0.001), whereas CIN revealed the highest risk (HR 16.7; 95% CI 9.9–28.1; p < 0.001). Conclusion Prevalence and outcome in ACS patients varied considerably depending on the AKI definition applied. To define patients with highest renal function-associated mortality risk, use of the CIN definition seems to have the highest prognostic relevance.
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-01985-9
work_keys_str_mv AT marenweferling definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT christophliebetrau definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT danielkraus definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT philippzierentz definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT beatricevonjeinsen definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT oliverdorr definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT michaelweber definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT holgernef definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT christianwhamm definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
AT tillkeller definitionofacutekidneyinjuryimpactsprevalenceandprognosisinacspatientsundergoingcoronaryangiography
_version_ 1721522319514402816