Devices for In Situ Development of Non-Disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.

Objective: The aim of this review was to assess the types of devices used for in situ development of oral biofilm analysed microbiologically.Material and Methods:A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify all in situ studies of oral biofilm which used an oral device; the Ovid ME...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ISABEL PRADA-LÓPEZ, Victor Quintas, CARLOS VILABOA, DAVID SUÁREZ-QUINTANILLA, INMACULADA TOMÁS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01055/full
id doaj-cc6e6d15cd494410858a622417a51aa5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc6e6d15cd494410858a622417a51aa52020-11-25T00:45:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2016-07-01710.3389/fmicb.2016.01055186664Devices for In Situ Development of Non-Disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.ISABEL PRADA-LÓPEZ0Victor Quintas1CARLOS VILABOA2DAVID SUÁREZ-QUINTANILLA3INMACULADA TOMÁS4School of Medicine and DentistrySchool of Medicine and DentistrySchool of Medicine and DentistrySchool of Medicine and DentistrySchool of Medicine and DentistryObjective: The aim of this review was to assess the types of devices used for in situ development of oral biofilm analysed microbiologically.Material and Methods:A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify all in situ studies of oral biofilm which used an oral device; the Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases complemented with manual search were used. Specific devices used to microbiologically analyse oral biofilm in adults were included. After reading of the selected full texts, devices were identified and classified according to the oral cavity zone and manufacturing material. The ideal characteristics were analysed in every group. Results: The search provided 787 abstracts, of which 112 papers were included. The devices used in these studies were classified as palatal, lingual or buccal. The last group was sub-classified in six groups based on the material of the device. Considering the analysed characteristics, the thermoplastic devices and the Intraoral Device of Overlaid Disk-holding Splints (IDODS) presented more advantages than limitations.Conclusions: Buccal devices were most commonly used for the study of in situ biofilm. The majority of buccal devices seemed to slightly affect the volunteer’s comfort, the IDODS being the closest to the ideal model. Clinical Relevance: New devices for in situ oral biofilm microbiological studies should take into account the possible effect of their design on the volunteer’s comfort and biofilm formation.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01055/fullDental Plaquein situBiofilmDevice designSplints.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author ISABEL PRADA-LÓPEZ
Victor Quintas
CARLOS VILABOA
DAVID SUÁREZ-QUINTANILLA
INMACULADA TOMÁS
spellingShingle ISABEL PRADA-LÓPEZ
Victor Quintas
CARLOS VILABOA
DAVID SUÁREZ-QUINTANILLA
INMACULADA TOMÁS
Devices for In Situ Development of Non-Disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.
Frontiers in Microbiology
Dental Plaque
in situ
Biofilm
Device design
Splints.
author_facet ISABEL PRADA-LÓPEZ
Victor Quintas
CARLOS VILABOA
DAVID SUÁREZ-QUINTANILLA
INMACULADA TOMÁS
author_sort ISABEL PRADA-LÓPEZ
title Devices for In Situ Development of Non-Disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.
title_short Devices for In Situ Development of Non-Disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.
title_full Devices for In Situ Development of Non-Disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.
title_fullStr Devices for In Situ Development of Non-Disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.
title_full_unstemmed Devices for In Situ Development of Non-Disturbed Oral Biofilm. A Systematic Review.
title_sort devices for in situ development of non-disturbed oral biofilm. a systematic review.
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Objective: The aim of this review was to assess the types of devices used for in situ development of oral biofilm analysed microbiologically.Material and Methods:A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify all in situ studies of oral biofilm which used an oral device; the Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases complemented with manual search were used. Specific devices used to microbiologically analyse oral biofilm in adults were included. After reading of the selected full texts, devices were identified and classified according to the oral cavity zone and manufacturing material. The ideal characteristics were analysed in every group. Results: The search provided 787 abstracts, of which 112 papers were included. The devices used in these studies were classified as palatal, lingual or buccal. The last group was sub-classified in six groups based on the material of the device. Considering the analysed characteristics, the thermoplastic devices and the Intraoral Device of Overlaid Disk-holding Splints (IDODS) presented more advantages than limitations.Conclusions: Buccal devices were most commonly used for the study of in situ biofilm. The majority of buccal devices seemed to slightly affect the volunteer’s comfort, the IDODS being the closest to the ideal model. Clinical Relevance: New devices for in situ oral biofilm microbiological studies should take into account the possible effect of their design on the volunteer’s comfort and biofilm formation.
topic Dental Plaque
in situ
Biofilm
Device design
Splints.
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01055/full
work_keys_str_mv AT isabelpradalopez devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview
AT victorquintas devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview
AT carlosvilaboa devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview
AT davidsuarezquintanilla devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview
AT inmaculadatomas devicesforinsitudevelopmentofnondisturbedoralbiofilmasystematicreview
_version_ 1725270918711738368