Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson’s disease

Reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in both savings and anterograde interference in adaptation to a visuomotor rotation (c.f.Huang et al., 2011). In Parkinson’s disease (PD), dopamine dysfunction is known to impair reinforcement mechanisms, and cou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li-Ann eLeow, Aymar ede Rugy, Andrea Mary Loftus, Geoff eHammond
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00055/full
id doaj-cc6576bc5c1d432f98bfdcab57120291
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc6576bc5c1d432f98bfdcab571202912020-11-25T02:19:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612013-02-01710.3389/fnhum.2013.0005539031Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson’s diseaseLi-Ann eLeow0Li-Ann eLeow1Aymar ede Rugy2Andrea Mary Loftus3Andrea Mary Loftus4Geoff eHammond5School of Psychology, University of Western AustraliaParkinson's Centre (ParkC), Edith Cowan UniversityThe University of QueenslandParkinson's Centre (ParkC), Edith Cowan UniversitySchool of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin UniversitySchool of Psychology, University of Western AustraliaReinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in both savings and anterograde interference in adaptation to a visuomotor rotation (c.f.Huang et al., 2011). In Parkinson’s disease (PD), dopamine dysfunction is known to impair reinforcement mechanisms, and could also affect use-dependent plasticity. Here, we assessed savings and anterograde interference in PD with an A1-B-A2 paradigm in which movement repetition was (i) favored by the use of a single target, and (ii) manipulated through the amount of initial training. PD patients and controls completed either limited or extended training in A1 where they adapted movement to a 30° counter-clockwise rotation of visual feedback of the movement trajectory, and then adapted to a 30° clockwise rotation in B. After subsequent washout, participants readapted to the first 30° counter-clockwise rotation in A2. Controls showed significant anterograde interference from A1 to B only after extended training, and significant A1-B-A2 savings after both limited and extended training. However, despite similar A1 adaptation to controls, PD patients showed neither anterograde interference nor savings. That extended training was necessary in controls to elicit anterograde interference but not savings suggests that savings and anterograde interference do not result from equal contributions of the same underlying mechanism(s). It is suggested that use-dependent plasticity mechanisms contributes to anterograde interference but not to savings, while reinforcement mechanisms contribute to both. As both savings and anterograde interference were impaired in PD, dopamine dysfunction in PD might impair both reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms during adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00055/fullParkinson's diseasemotor learningmotor adaptationvisuomotor rotationanterograde interferencesavings
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Li-Ann eLeow
Li-Ann eLeow
Aymar ede Rugy
Andrea Mary Loftus
Andrea Mary Loftus
Geoff eHammond
spellingShingle Li-Ann eLeow
Li-Ann eLeow
Aymar ede Rugy
Andrea Mary Loftus
Andrea Mary Loftus
Geoff eHammond
Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson’s disease
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Parkinson's disease
motor learning
motor adaptation
visuomotor rotation
anterograde interference
savings
author_facet Li-Ann eLeow
Li-Ann eLeow
Aymar ede Rugy
Andrea Mary Loftus
Andrea Mary Loftus
Geoff eHammond
author_sort Li-Ann eLeow
title Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson’s disease
title_short Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson’s disease
title_full Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in Parkinson’s disease
title_sort different mechanisms contributing to savings and anterograde interference are impaired in parkinson’s disease
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2013-02-01
description Reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in both savings and anterograde interference in adaptation to a visuomotor rotation (c.f.Huang et al., 2011). In Parkinson’s disease (PD), dopamine dysfunction is known to impair reinforcement mechanisms, and could also affect use-dependent plasticity. Here, we assessed savings and anterograde interference in PD with an A1-B-A2 paradigm in which movement repetition was (i) favored by the use of a single target, and (ii) manipulated through the amount of initial training. PD patients and controls completed either limited or extended training in A1 where they adapted movement to a 30° counter-clockwise rotation of visual feedback of the movement trajectory, and then adapted to a 30° clockwise rotation in B. After subsequent washout, participants readapted to the first 30° counter-clockwise rotation in A2. Controls showed significant anterograde interference from A1 to B only after extended training, and significant A1-B-A2 savings after both limited and extended training. However, despite similar A1 adaptation to controls, PD patients showed neither anterograde interference nor savings. That extended training was necessary in controls to elicit anterograde interference but not savings suggests that savings and anterograde interference do not result from equal contributions of the same underlying mechanism(s). It is suggested that use-dependent plasticity mechanisms contributes to anterograde interference but not to savings, while reinforcement mechanisms contribute to both. As both savings and anterograde interference were impaired in PD, dopamine dysfunction in PD might impair both reinforcement and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms during adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.
topic Parkinson's disease
motor learning
motor adaptation
visuomotor rotation
anterograde interference
savings
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00055/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lianneleow differentmechanismscontributingtosavingsandanterogradeinterferenceareimpairedinparkinsonsdisease
AT lianneleow differentmechanismscontributingtosavingsandanterogradeinterferenceareimpairedinparkinsonsdisease
AT aymarederugy differentmechanismscontributingtosavingsandanterogradeinterferenceareimpairedinparkinsonsdisease
AT andreamaryloftus differentmechanismscontributingtosavingsandanterogradeinterferenceareimpairedinparkinsonsdisease
AT andreamaryloftus differentmechanismscontributingtosavingsandanterogradeinterferenceareimpairedinparkinsonsdisease
AT geoffehammond differentmechanismscontributingtosavingsandanterogradeinterferenceareimpairedinparkinsonsdisease
_version_ 1724878664522268672