Comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogs

Contamination of surgical sites often resulting from inadequate surgical site preparation and poor asepsis is a common cause of surgical site infection (SSI) and postoperative complications. Standard practice ensuring preoperative skin disinfection helps to prevent the incidence of SSI. The choice o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gladys O. Melekwe, Edwin A. Uwagie-Ero, Hassan A. Zoaka, Eugene A. Odigie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-04-01
Series:International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314459917301266
id doaj-cc6168a3fe154436bcb5801cf66f899a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc6168a3fe154436bcb5801cf66f899a2020-11-25T01:08:07ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine2314-45992018-04-0161113116Comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogsGladys O. Melekwe0Edwin A. Uwagie-Ero1Hassan A. Zoaka2Eugene A. Odigie3Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, NigeriaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria; Corresponding author.Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, NigeriaDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Benin, Benin City, NigeriaContamination of surgical sites often resulting from inadequate surgical site preparation and poor asepsis is a common cause of surgical site infection (SSI) and postoperative complications. Standard practice ensuring preoperative skin disinfection helps to prevent the incidence of SSI. The choice of antiseptic therefore poses a serious counterbalance for the surgeon. This study was carried out to determine whether skin asepsis immediately prior to surgical site incision will reduce skin microbial burden that may potentiate the incidence of SSI and to compare the clinical effectiveness of chlorhexidine gluconate B.P 0.3%W/V, Cetrimide B.P 3.05 W/V (CG + Cetrimide) against povidone iodine 10% (PI) in pre-surgical skin preparation and asepsis in dogs. A total of 15 dogs were used for the study. Both side of each dog was used for the study, right side for CG + Certrimide and left side for PI; (n = 30). Aseptic agents’ chlorhexidine gluconate 0.3% and Cetrimide 3.0% and povidine iodine 10% were used as pre surgical scrub solutions prior to surgery. Swab samples were evaluated before scrubbing, 0, 30, 60 and 90 min after scrubbing. Percent reductions of bacterial colony forming units were determined for all site scrub techniques. Mixed-design ANOVA results revealed significant difference (P < 0.05) within groups and no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the disinfectant effects between groups treated with CG + Cetrimide and povidone iodine respectively across the various time periods. Changes in the mean bacteria count were observed to be equivalent using CG + Cetrimide and povidone iodine. It was concluded that there was no significant difference between CG + Cetrimide and PI in preoperative surgical skin preparations. Keywords: Asepsis, Cetrimide, Chlorhexidine-gluconate, Povidone-iodine, Skin preparation, Surgical site infectionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314459917301266
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gladys O. Melekwe
Edwin A. Uwagie-Ero
Hassan A. Zoaka
Eugene A. Odigie
spellingShingle Gladys O. Melekwe
Edwin A. Uwagie-Ero
Hassan A. Zoaka
Eugene A. Odigie
Comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogs
International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine
author_facet Gladys O. Melekwe
Edwin A. Uwagie-Ero
Hassan A. Zoaka
Eugene A. Odigie
author_sort Gladys O. Melekwe
title Comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogs
title_short Comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogs
title_full Comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogs
title_fullStr Comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogs
title_sort comparative clinical effectiveness of preoperative skin antiseptic preparations of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine for preventing surgical site infections in dogs
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine
issn 2314-4599
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Contamination of surgical sites often resulting from inadequate surgical site preparation and poor asepsis is a common cause of surgical site infection (SSI) and postoperative complications. Standard practice ensuring preoperative skin disinfection helps to prevent the incidence of SSI. The choice of antiseptic therefore poses a serious counterbalance for the surgeon. This study was carried out to determine whether skin asepsis immediately prior to surgical site incision will reduce skin microbial burden that may potentiate the incidence of SSI and to compare the clinical effectiveness of chlorhexidine gluconate B.P 0.3%W/V, Cetrimide B.P 3.05 W/V (CG + Cetrimide) against povidone iodine 10% (PI) in pre-surgical skin preparation and asepsis in dogs. A total of 15 dogs were used for the study. Both side of each dog was used for the study, right side for CG + Certrimide and left side for PI; (n = 30). Aseptic agents’ chlorhexidine gluconate 0.3% and Cetrimide 3.0% and povidine iodine 10% were used as pre surgical scrub solutions prior to surgery. Swab samples were evaluated before scrubbing, 0, 30, 60 and 90 min after scrubbing. Percent reductions of bacterial colony forming units were determined for all site scrub techniques. Mixed-design ANOVA results revealed significant difference (P < 0.05) within groups and no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the disinfectant effects between groups treated with CG + Cetrimide and povidone iodine respectively across the various time periods. Changes in the mean bacteria count were observed to be equivalent using CG + Cetrimide and povidone iodine. It was concluded that there was no significant difference between CG + Cetrimide and PI in preoperative surgical skin preparations. Keywords: Asepsis, Cetrimide, Chlorhexidine-gluconate, Povidone-iodine, Skin preparation, Surgical site infection
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314459917301266
work_keys_str_mv AT gladysomelekwe comparativeclinicaleffectivenessofpreoperativeskinantisepticpreparationsofchlorhexidinegluconateandpovidoneiodineforpreventingsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogs
AT edwinauwagieero comparativeclinicaleffectivenessofpreoperativeskinantisepticpreparationsofchlorhexidinegluconateandpovidoneiodineforpreventingsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogs
AT hassanazoaka comparativeclinicaleffectivenessofpreoperativeskinantisepticpreparationsofchlorhexidinegluconateandpovidoneiodineforpreventingsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogs
AT eugeneaodigie comparativeclinicaleffectivenessofpreoperativeskinantisepticpreparationsofchlorhexidinegluconateandpovidoneiodineforpreventingsurgicalsiteinfectionsindogs
_version_ 1725184168797667328