Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study
Objective: The use of presently available dentin bonding systems has greatly reduced mi-croleakage; however, the ideal situation where the adhesive resin completely penetrates the demineralized dentin is not yet achieved. The purpose was to compare the microleak-age of fifth and sixth generation bon...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2008-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/11983.pdf |
id |
doaj-cc597a0af405401284d804dea79a63ec |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cc597a0af405401284d804dea79a63ec2020-11-25T03:18:18ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2008-21852008-03-01512330Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro StudyM. MoezizadehS. MoayediObjective: The use of presently available dentin bonding systems has greatly reduced mi-croleakage; however, the ideal situation where the adhesive resin completely penetrates the demineralized dentin is not yet achieved. The purpose was to compare the microleak-age of fifth and sixth generation bonding agents at enamel and dentinal margins.Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared at the CEJ of thirty extracted human premolars. The teeth were divided into three groups (n=10). In group I, cavities were treated with Prime&Bond NT; in group II, UniFil Bond; and in group III, Prompt L-Pop bonding agents were used following which composite resin (Z100) was placed incre-mentally. The specimens were stored in an environment of 100% humidity, immersed in a fresh solution of 50% Silver Nitrate each for 24 hours and then placed in a developing so-lution for 8 hours. After rinsing and being sectioned buccolingually through the center of the restoration, the samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at x50 magnificationfor microleakage along occlusal and gingival margins. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Multiple Comparison tests.Results: There wasa significant difference between the three groups. The fifth generation dentin bonding agent (Prime&Bond NT) showed the least amount of microleakage, while the sixth generation ones (UniFil Bond and Prompt L-Pop) showed higher amounts at enamel and dentinal margins.Conclusion: Fifth generation bonding agents seem to generate better results than those of sixth generation.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/11983.pdfDentin-Bonding AgentsDental LeakagePrompt L-PopPrime and Bond NTUnifil BondZ100 Composite Resin |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Moezizadeh S. Moayedi |
spellingShingle |
M. Moezizadeh S. Moayedi Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Dentin-Bonding Agents Dental Leakage Prompt L-Pop Prime and Bond NT Unifil Bond Z100 Composite Resin |
author_facet |
M. Moezizadeh S. Moayedi |
author_sort |
M. Moezizadeh |
title |
Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study |
title_short |
Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study |
title_full |
Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr |
Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort |
microleakage of "all-in-one" adhesive systems on enamel and dentinal margins: an in vitro study |
publisher |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
issn |
2008-2185 |
publishDate |
2008-03-01 |
description |
Objective: The use of presently available dentin bonding systems has greatly reduced mi-croleakage; however, the ideal situation where the adhesive resin completely penetrates the demineralized dentin is not yet achieved. The purpose was to compare the microleak-age of fifth and sixth generation bonding agents at enamel and dentinal margins.Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared at the CEJ of thirty extracted human premolars. The teeth were divided into three groups (n=10). In group I, cavities were treated with Prime&Bond NT; in group II, UniFil Bond; and in group III, Prompt L-Pop bonding agents were used following which composite resin (Z100) was placed incre-mentally. The specimens were stored in an environment of 100% humidity, immersed in a fresh solution of 50% Silver Nitrate each for 24 hours and then placed in a developing so-lution for 8 hours. After rinsing and being sectioned buccolingually through the center of the restoration, the samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at x50 magnificationfor microleakage along occlusal and gingival margins. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Multiple Comparison tests.Results: There wasa significant difference between the three groups. The fifth generation dentin bonding agent (Prime&Bond NT) showed the least amount of microleakage, while the sixth generation ones (UniFil Bond and Prompt L-Pop) showed higher amounts at enamel and dentinal margins.Conclusion: Fifth generation bonding agents seem to generate better results than those of sixth generation. |
topic |
Dentin-Bonding Agents Dental Leakage Prompt L-Pop Prime and Bond NT Unifil Bond Z100 Composite Resin |
url |
http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/11983.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mmoezizadeh microleakageofallinoneadhesivesystemsonenamelanddentinalmarginsaninvitrostudy AT smoayedi microleakageofallinoneadhesivesystemsonenamelanddentinalmarginsaninvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1724627600707420160 |