Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study

Objective: The use of presently available dentin bonding systems has greatly reduced mi-croleakage; however, the ideal situation where the adhesive resin completely penetrates the demineralized dentin is not yet achieved. The purpose was to compare the microleak-age of fifth and sixth generation bon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Moezizadeh, S. Moayedi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2008-03-01
Series:Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/11983.pdf
id doaj-cc597a0af405401284d804dea79a63ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc597a0af405401284d804dea79a63ec2020-11-25T03:18:18ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2008-21852008-03-01512330Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro StudyM. MoezizadehS. MoayediObjective: The use of presently available dentin bonding systems has greatly reduced mi-croleakage; however, the ideal situation where the adhesive resin completely penetrates the demineralized dentin is not yet achieved. The purpose was to compare the microleak-age of fifth and sixth generation bonding agents at enamel and dentinal margins.Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared at the CEJ of thirty extracted human premolars. The teeth were divided into three groups (n=10). In group I, cavities were treated with Prime&Bond NT; in group II, UniFil Bond; and in group III, Prompt L-Pop bonding agents were used following which composite resin (Z100) was placed incre-mentally. The specimens were stored in an environment of 100% humidity, immersed in a fresh solution of 50% Silver Nitrate each for 24 hours and then placed in a developing so-lution for 8 hours. After rinsing and being sectioned buccolingually through the center of the restoration, the samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at x50 magnificationfor microleakage along occlusal and gingival margins. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Multiple Comparison tests.Results: There wasa significant difference between the three groups. The fifth generation dentin bonding agent (Prime&Bond NT) showed the least amount of microleakage, while the sixth generation ones (UniFil Bond and Prompt L-Pop) showed higher amounts at enamel and dentinal margins.Conclusion: Fifth generation bonding agents seem to generate better results than those of sixth generation.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/11983.pdfDentin-Bonding AgentsDental LeakagePrompt L-PopPrime and Bond NTUnifil BondZ100 Composite Resin
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Moezizadeh
S. Moayedi
spellingShingle M. Moezizadeh
S. Moayedi
Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study
Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Dental Leakage
Prompt L-Pop
Prime and Bond NT
Unifil Bond
Z100 Composite Resin
author_facet M. Moezizadeh
S. Moayedi
author_sort M. Moezizadeh
title Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study
title_short Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study
title_full Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Microleakage of "All-in-One" Adhesive Systems on Enamel and Dentinal Margins: An In Vitro Study
title_sort microleakage of "all-in-one" adhesive systems on enamel and dentinal margins: an in vitro study
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
issn 2008-2185
publishDate 2008-03-01
description Objective: The use of presently available dentin bonding systems has greatly reduced mi-croleakage; however, the ideal situation where the adhesive resin completely penetrates the demineralized dentin is not yet achieved. The purpose was to compare the microleak-age of fifth and sixth generation bonding agents at enamel and dentinal margins.Materials and Methods: Class V cavities were prepared at the CEJ of thirty extracted human premolars. The teeth were divided into three groups (n=10). In group I, cavities were treated with Prime&Bond NT; in group II, UniFil Bond; and in group III, Prompt L-Pop bonding agents were used following which composite resin (Z100) was placed incre-mentally. The specimens were stored in an environment of 100% humidity, immersed in a fresh solution of 50% Silver Nitrate each for 24 hours and then placed in a developing so-lution for 8 hours. After rinsing and being sectioned buccolingually through the center of the restoration, the samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at x50 magnificationfor microleakage along occlusal and gingival margins. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Multiple Comparison tests.Results: There wasa significant difference between the three groups. The fifth generation dentin bonding agent (Prime&Bond NT) showed the least amount of microleakage, while the sixth generation ones (UniFil Bond and Prompt L-Pop) showed higher amounts at enamel and dentinal margins.Conclusion: Fifth generation bonding agents seem to generate better results than those of sixth generation.
topic Dentin-Bonding Agents
Dental Leakage
Prompt L-Pop
Prime and Bond NT
Unifil Bond
Z100 Composite Resin
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/11983.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mmoezizadeh microleakageofallinoneadhesivesystemsonenamelanddentinalmarginsaninvitrostudy
AT smoayedi microleakageofallinoneadhesivesystemsonenamelanddentinalmarginsaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1724627600707420160