Forest Disturbance Types and Current Analogs for Historical Disturbance-Independent Forests

• Main Author: Brice B. Hanberry
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
• Series: Land
• Subjects: analogue; climate; climate change; disturbance; maple; no-analog
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/136

Forest classifications by disturbance permit designation of multiple types of both old growth forests and shorter-lived forests, which auto-replace under severe disturbance, and also identification of loss of the disturbance type and associated forest. Historically, fire and flooding disturbance regimes, or conversely, infrequent disturbance, produced unique forests such as disturbance-independent forests of American beech (<i>Fagus grandifolia</i>), eastern hemlock (<i>Tsuga canadensis</i>), and sugar maple (<i>Acer saccharum</i>) in the Eastern United States. However, disturbance has changed to primarily frequent mechanical overstory disturbance, resulting in novel forests. To demonstrate the transition to no-analog forests after disturbance change, I compared historical tree surveys (ca. 1837 to 1857) to current surveys in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan. To establish widespread disturbance change effects, I also located where beech and hemlock are currently most abundant throughout the Eastern US compared to historical distribution of beech–hemlock forests. In the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan, beech and hemlock historically were about 30% of all trees, but currently, beech and hemlock are 2% of all trees. Red maple (<i>Acer rubrum</i>) increased from 1% to 11% of all trees and aspen (<i>Populus</i>) increased from 2% to 13% of all trees. The squared-chord difference between historical and current surveys was 0.40, or dissimilar forests. Areas with ≥20% beech and hemlock or ≥15% of either species decreased from about 52 million to 6 million hectares, with current distribution restricted to the Northeastern US. Current forests are dissimilar to historical forests, and this transition appears to be driven by disturbance regimes without historical analogs. Disturbance change may provide perspective in forest management for climate change.