‘Fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in European natural history museums

This paper examines learning among museum staff involved in exhibition development in four European natural history museums. It draws upon a larger body of research1 undertaken for the Mirror project, a European Commission Framework Programme 5 Information Society Technologies (FT5 IST) project aime...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anders Høg Hansen, Theano Moussouri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Leicester 2004-11-01
Series:Museum & Society
Online Access:https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/47
id doaj-cc1db44ff22740d396300cfd51646b04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cc1db44ff22740d396300cfd51646b042020-11-24T23:31:31ZengUniversity of LeicesterMuseum & Society1479-83602004-11-012316117437‘Fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in European natural history museumsAnders Høg HansenTheano MoussouriThis paper examines learning among museum staff involved in exhibition development in four European natural history museums. It draws upon a larger body of research1 undertaken for the Mirror project, a European Commission Framework Programme 5 Information Society Technologies (FT5 IST) project aimed at enhancing and improving co-operative practices through the use of new technologies. The aim of this paper is to characterize learning and co-operative practices derived from the interactions of highly heterogeneous teams involved in constructing museum exhibitions, and particularly to distinguish and examine the relationships between actions aimed at fulfilling team-focused exhibition outcomes and those which draw upon the knowledge base of external peer groups. The concepts of communities of practice (Wenger, 2000, Wenger, Snyder and McDermott, 2002), situated learning (Lave and Wenger, 1991) and vertical team-work and horizontal peer-group exchange are used to describe the learning interactions and co-operative practices. However, whilst the relationship between situated learning and Communities of Practice has determined our preliminary theoretical perspective, this has, as we explain below, been heuristically revised in the light of the practical reality that we encountered.https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/47
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anders Høg Hansen
Theano Moussouri
spellingShingle Anders Høg Hansen
Theano Moussouri
‘Fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in European natural history museums
Museum & Society
author_facet Anders Høg Hansen
Theano Moussouri
author_sort Anders Høg Hansen
title ‘Fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in European natural history museums
title_short ‘Fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in European natural history museums
title_full ‘Fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in European natural history museums
title_fullStr ‘Fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in European natural history museums
title_full_unstemmed ‘Fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in European natural history museums
title_sort ‘fuzzy’ boundaries: communities of practice and exhibition teams in european natural history museums
publisher University of Leicester
series Museum & Society
issn 1479-8360
publishDate 2004-11-01
description This paper examines learning among museum staff involved in exhibition development in four European natural history museums. It draws upon a larger body of research1 undertaken for the Mirror project, a European Commission Framework Programme 5 Information Society Technologies (FT5 IST) project aimed at enhancing and improving co-operative practices through the use of new technologies. The aim of this paper is to characterize learning and co-operative practices derived from the interactions of highly heterogeneous teams involved in constructing museum exhibitions, and particularly to distinguish and examine the relationships between actions aimed at fulfilling team-focused exhibition outcomes and those which draw upon the knowledge base of external peer groups. The concepts of communities of practice (Wenger, 2000, Wenger, Snyder and McDermott, 2002), situated learning (Lave and Wenger, 1991) and vertical team-work and horizontal peer-group exchange are used to describe the learning interactions and co-operative practices. However, whilst the relationship between situated learning and Communities of Practice has determined our preliminary theoretical perspective, this has, as we explain below, been heuristically revised in the light of the practical reality that we encountered.
url https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/mas/article/view/47
work_keys_str_mv AT andershøghansen fuzzyboundariescommunitiesofpracticeandexhibitionteamsineuropeannaturalhistorymuseums
AT theanomoussouri fuzzyboundariescommunitiesofpracticeandexhibitionteamsineuropeannaturalhistorymuseums
_version_ 1725537646847983616