Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing Data

Cheatgrass (<i>Bromus tectorum</i>) invasion is driving an emerging cycle of increased fire frequency and irreversible loss of wildlife habitat in the western US. Yet, detailed spatial information about its occurrence is still lacking for much of its presumably invaded range. Deep learni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyle B. Larson, Aaron R. Tuor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/7/1246
id doaj-cbffa9fff9094585bfca1cadd2edd784
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbffa9fff9094585bfca1cadd2edd7842021-03-26T00:02:26ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-03-01131246124610.3390/rs13071246Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing DataKyle B. Larson0Aaron R. Tuor1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USACheatgrass (<i>Bromus tectorum</i>) invasion is driving an emerging cycle of increased fire frequency and irreversible loss of wildlife habitat in the western US. Yet, detailed spatial information about its occurrence is still lacking for much of its presumably invaded range. Deep learning (DL) has demonstrated success for remote sensing applications but is less tested on more challenging tasks like identifying biological invasions using sub-pixel phenomena. We compare two DL architectures and the more conventional Random Forest and Logistic Regression methods to improve upon a previous effort to map cheatgrass occurrence at >2% canopy cover. High-dimensional sets of biophysical, MODIS, and Landsat-7 ETM+ predictor variables are also compared to evaluate different multi-modal data strategies. All model configurations improved results relative to the case study and accuracy generally improved by combining data from both sensors with biophysical data. Cheatgrass occurrence is mapped at 30 m ground sample distance (GSD) with an estimated 78.1% accuracy, compared to 250-m GSD and 71% map accuracy in the case study. Furthermore, DL is shown to be competitive with well-established machine learning methods in a limited data regime, suggesting it can be an effective tool for mapping biological invasions and more broadly for multi-modal remote sensing applications.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/7/1246deep learningmachine learningRandom Forestsupervised classificationlogistic regressionland cover classification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kyle B. Larson
Aaron R. Tuor
spellingShingle Kyle B. Larson
Aaron R. Tuor
Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing Data
Remote Sensing
deep learning
machine learning
Random Forest
supervised classification
logistic regression
land cover classification
author_facet Kyle B. Larson
Aaron R. Tuor
author_sort Kyle B. Larson
title Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing Data
title_short Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing Data
title_full Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing Data
title_fullStr Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing Data
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing Data
title_sort deep learning classification of cheatgrass invasion in the western united states using biophysical and remote sensing data
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Cheatgrass (<i>Bromus tectorum</i>) invasion is driving an emerging cycle of increased fire frequency and irreversible loss of wildlife habitat in the western US. Yet, detailed spatial information about its occurrence is still lacking for much of its presumably invaded range. Deep learning (DL) has demonstrated success for remote sensing applications but is less tested on more challenging tasks like identifying biological invasions using sub-pixel phenomena. We compare two DL architectures and the more conventional Random Forest and Logistic Regression methods to improve upon a previous effort to map cheatgrass occurrence at >2% canopy cover. High-dimensional sets of biophysical, MODIS, and Landsat-7 ETM+ predictor variables are also compared to evaluate different multi-modal data strategies. All model configurations improved results relative to the case study and accuracy generally improved by combining data from both sensors with biophysical data. Cheatgrass occurrence is mapped at 30 m ground sample distance (GSD) with an estimated 78.1% accuracy, compared to 250-m GSD and 71% map accuracy in the case study. Furthermore, DL is shown to be competitive with well-established machine learning methods in a limited data regime, suggesting it can be an effective tool for mapping biological invasions and more broadly for multi-modal remote sensing applications.
topic deep learning
machine learning
Random Forest
supervised classification
logistic regression
land cover classification
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/7/1246
work_keys_str_mv AT kyleblarson deeplearningclassificationofcheatgrassinvasioninthewesternunitedstatesusingbiophysicalandremotesensingdata
AT aaronrtuor deeplearningclassificationofcheatgrassinvasioninthewesternunitedstatesusingbiophysicalandremotesensingdata
_version_ 1724203241653141504