Comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depth

Obstacle detection is a key issue in many current applications, especially in applications that have been increasingly highlighted such as: advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) and autonomous navigation system. This can be achieved by active and pas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thiago Rateke, Vito Francisco Chiarella, Karla Aparecida Justen, Antonio Carlos Sobieranski, Sylvio Luiz Mantelli Neto, Eros Comunello, Aldo von Wangenheim
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Roraima, Centro de Ciência e Tecnologia 2020-07-01
Series:RCT: Revista de Ciência e Tecnologia
Online Access:https://revista.ufrr.br/rct/article/view/5966
id doaj-cbdc462a11a844638a4f8acaeabcbebf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbdc462a11a844638a4f8acaeabcbebf2021-06-10T21:56:13ZporUniversidade Federal de Roraima, Centro de Ciência e TecnologiaRCT: Revista de Ciência e Tecnologia2447-70282020-07-01602358Comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depthThiago Rateke0Vito Francisco Chiarella1Karla Aparecida Justen2Antonio Carlos Sobieranski3Sylvio Luiz Mantelli Neto4Eros Comunello5Aldo von Wangenheim6Postgraduate Program in Computer Science (PPFCC), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Department of Informatics and Statistics.Graduate Program in Materials Science and Engineering (PGMAT). Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC).Image Processing and Computer Graphics Lab (LAPIX). National Institute for Digital Convergence (INCoD).Department of Computing. Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC).Image Processing and Computer Graphics Lab (LAPIX). National Institute for Digital Convergence (INCoD).Master in Applied Computing (MCA). University of Itajaí Valley (UNIVALI).Graduate Program in Computer Science (PPGCC). Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC). Department of Informatics and Statistics. Image Processing and Computer Graphics Lab (LAPIX). National Institute for Digital Convergence (INCoD).Obstacle detection is a key issue in many current applications, especially in applications that have been increasingly highlighted such as: advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) and autonomous navigation system. This can be achieved by active and passive acquisition vision systems, for example: laser and cameras respectively. In this paper we present a comparison between low-cost active and passive devices, more specifically LIDAR and two cameras. To this comparison a disparity map is created by stereo correspondence through two images and a point cloud map created by LIDAR data values (distances measures). The obtained results shown that passive vision can be as good as or even better than active vision in low cost scenarios.https://revista.ufrr.br/rct/article/view/5966
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thiago Rateke
Vito Francisco Chiarella
Karla Aparecida Justen
Antonio Carlos Sobieranski
Sylvio Luiz Mantelli Neto
Eros Comunello
Aldo von Wangenheim
spellingShingle Thiago Rateke
Vito Francisco Chiarella
Karla Aparecida Justen
Antonio Carlos Sobieranski
Sylvio Luiz Mantelli Neto
Eros Comunello
Aldo von Wangenheim
Comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depth
RCT: Revista de Ciência e Tecnologia
author_facet Thiago Rateke
Vito Francisco Chiarella
Karla Aparecida Justen
Antonio Carlos Sobieranski
Sylvio Luiz Mantelli Neto
Eros Comunello
Aldo von Wangenheim
author_sort Thiago Rateke
title Comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depth
title_short Comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depth
title_full Comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depth
title_fullStr Comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depth
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depth
title_sort comparison between low-cost passive and active vision for obstacle depth
publisher Universidade Federal de Roraima, Centro de Ciência e Tecnologia
series RCT: Revista de Ciência e Tecnologia
issn 2447-7028
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Obstacle detection is a key issue in many current applications, especially in applications that have been increasingly highlighted such as: advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) and autonomous navigation system. This can be achieved by active and passive acquisition vision systems, for example: laser and cameras respectively. In this paper we present a comparison between low-cost active and passive devices, more specifically LIDAR and two cameras. To this comparison a disparity map is created by stereo correspondence through two images and a point cloud map created by LIDAR data values (distances measures). The obtained results shown that passive vision can be as good as or even better than active vision in low cost scenarios.
url https://revista.ufrr.br/rct/article/view/5966
work_keys_str_mv AT thiagorateke comparisonbetweenlowcostpassiveandactivevisionforobstacledepth
AT vitofranciscochiarella comparisonbetweenlowcostpassiveandactivevisionforobstacledepth
AT karlaaparecidajusten comparisonbetweenlowcostpassiveandactivevisionforobstacledepth
AT antoniocarlossobieranski comparisonbetweenlowcostpassiveandactivevisionforobstacledepth
AT sylvioluizmantellineto comparisonbetweenlowcostpassiveandactivevisionforobstacledepth
AT eroscomunello comparisonbetweenlowcostpassiveandactivevisionforobstacledepth
AT aldovonwangenheim comparisonbetweenlowcostpassiveandactivevisionforobstacledepth
_version_ 1721384423760330752