Essential aspects of the follow‐up after acute pulmonary embolism: An illustrated review

Abstract Care for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) involves more than determination of the duration of anticoagulant therapy. After choosing the optimal initial management strategy based on modern risk stratification schemes, patients require focused attention aimed at prevention of major...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gudula J. A. M. Boon, Harm Jan Bogaard, Frederikus A. Klok
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-08-01
Series:Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12404
Description
Summary:Abstract Care for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) involves more than determination of the duration of anticoagulant therapy. After choosing the optimal initial management strategy based on modern risk stratification schemes, patients require focused attention aimed at prevention of major bleeding, identification of underlying (malignant) disease, prevention of cardiovascular disease, and monitoring for long‐term complications. The most frequent complication of PE is the so‐called “post‐PE syndrome,” a phenomenon of permanent functional limitations after PE occurring in up to 50% of patients. The post‐PE syndrome is caused by persistent deconditioning, anxiety, and/or ventilatory or circulatory impairment as a result of acute PE. The most severe and most feared presentation of the post‐PE syndrome is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), a deadly disease if it remains untreated. While CTEPH may be successfully treated with pulmonary endarterectomy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and/or pulmonary hypertension drugs, the major challenge is to diagnose CTEPH at an early stage. Poor awareness for the post‐PE syndrome and in particular for CTEPH, high prevalence of persistent symptoms after PE and inefficient application of diagnostic tests in clinical practice all contribute to an unacceptable diagnostic delay and underdiagnosis. Its consequences are dire: increased mortality in patients with CTEPH, and excess health care costs, higher prevalence of depression, more unemployment and poorer quality of life in patients with post‐PE syndrome in general. In this review, we provide an overview of the incidence and impact of the post‐PE syndrome, and illustrate the clinical presentation, optimal diagnostic strategy as well as therapeutic options.
ISSN:2475-0379