Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method
The governmental approach to the selection of the Czech regions (NUTS 4) for the state support distribution is analyzed and the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is proposed. A set of used indicators, their dependence or independence, and their availability in the statistical databases of the Cz...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2015-06-01
|
Series: | Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0021 |
id |
doaj-cbd42814f1f54ecfb9796c70c3bd8ddc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cbd42814f1f54ecfb9796c70c3bd8ddc2021-09-05T14:00:23ZengSciendoScientia Agriculturae Bohemica1211-31741805-94302015-06-01462849410.1515/sab-2015-0021sab-2015-0021Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA MethodBrožová H.0Hornická A.1Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech RepublicCzech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech RepublicThe governmental approach to the selection of the Czech regions (NUTS 4) for the state support distribution is analyzed and the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is proposed. A set of used indicators, their dependence or independence, and their availability in the statistical databases of the Czech Statistical Office are examined. The results of the selection method used by the Czech government (Simple Additive Weighting method with the linear scale transformation procedure based on reference variant) and the results provided by the proposed DEA model (covering both the used indicators and a proposed set of indicators) are compared. All results indicate that the DEA method is a useful tool for the ranking of the regions and for the selection of the regions intended for the concentrated state support. Its advantage is that the weights of the indicators (inputs and outputs) should not be estimated subjectively before computationhttps://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0021disadvantaged regionsregional disparitiesmulti-criteria decision makingdata envelopment analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brožová H. Hornická A. |
spellingShingle |
Brožová H. Hornická A. Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica disadvantaged regions regional disparities multi-criteria decision making data envelopment analysis |
author_facet |
Brožová H. Hornická A. |
author_sort |
Brožová H. |
title |
Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method |
title_short |
Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method |
title_full |
Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method |
title_fullStr |
Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method |
title_sort |
identifying the disadvantaged regions for concentrated state support using the dea method |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica |
issn |
1211-3174 1805-9430 |
publishDate |
2015-06-01 |
description |
The governmental approach to the selection of the Czech regions (NUTS 4) for the state support distribution is analyzed and the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is proposed. A set of used indicators, their dependence or independence, and their availability in the statistical databases of the Czech Statistical Office are examined. The results of the selection method used by the Czech government (Simple Additive Weighting method with the linear scale transformation procedure based on reference variant) and the results provided by the proposed DEA model (covering both the used indicators and a proposed set of indicators) are compared. All results indicate that the DEA method is a useful tool for the ranking of the regions and for the selection of the regions intended for the concentrated state support. Its advantage is that the weights of the indicators (inputs and outputs) should not be estimated subjectively before computation |
topic |
disadvantaged regions regional disparities multi-criteria decision making data envelopment analysis |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0021 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brozovah identifyingthedisadvantagedregionsforconcentratedstatesupportusingthedeamethod AT hornickaa identifyingthedisadvantagedregionsforconcentratedstatesupportusingthedeamethod |
_version_ |
1717812023655399424 |