Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method

The governmental approach to the selection of the Czech regions (NUTS 4) for the state support distribution is analyzed and the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is proposed. A set of used indicators, their dependence or independence, and their availability in the statistical databases of the Cz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brožová H., Hornická A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2015-06-01
Series:Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0021
id doaj-cbd42814f1f54ecfb9796c70c3bd8ddc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbd42814f1f54ecfb9796c70c3bd8ddc2021-09-05T14:00:23ZengSciendoScientia Agriculturae Bohemica1211-31741805-94302015-06-01462849410.1515/sab-2015-0021sab-2015-0021Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA MethodBrožová H.0Hornická A.1Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech RepublicCzech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech RepublicThe governmental approach to the selection of the Czech regions (NUTS 4) for the state support distribution is analyzed and the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is proposed. A set of used indicators, their dependence or independence, and their availability in the statistical databases of the Czech Statistical Office are examined. The results of the selection method used by the Czech government (Simple Additive Weighting method with the linear scale transformation procedure based on reference variant) and the results provided by the proposed DEA model (covering both the used indicators and a proposed set of indicators) are compared. All results indicate that the DEA method is a useful tool for the ranking of the regions and for the selection of the regions intended for the concentrated state support. Its advantage is that the weights of the indicators (inputs and outputs) should not be estimated subjectively before computationhttps://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0021disadvantaged regionsregional disparitiesmulti-criteria decision makingdata envelopment analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brožová H.
Hornická A.
spellingShingle Brožová H.
Hornická A.
Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica
disadvantaged regions
regional disparities
multi-criteria decision making
data envelopment analysis
author_facet Brožová H.
Hornická A.
author_sort Brožová H.
title Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method
title_short Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method
title_full Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method
title_fullStr Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the Disadvantaged Regions for Concentrated State Support Using the DEA Method
title_sort identifying the disadvantaged regions for concentrated state support using the dea method
publisher Sciendo
series Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica
issn 1211-3174
1805-9430
publishDate 2015-06-01
description The governmental approach to the selection of the Czech regions (NUTS 4) for the state support distribution is analyzed and the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is proposed. A set of used indicators, their dependence or independence, and their availability in the statistical databases of the Czech Statistical Office are examined. The results of the selection method used by the Czech government (Simple Additive Weighting method with the linear scale transformation procedure based on reference variant) and the results provided by the proposed DEA model (covering both the used indicators and a proposed set of indicators) are compared. All results indicate that the DEA method is a useful tool for the ranking of the regions and for the selection of the regions intended for the concentrated state support. Its advantage is that the weights of the indicators (inputs and outputs) should not be estimated subjectively before computation
topic disadvantaged regions
regional disparities
multi-criteria decision making
data envelopment analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1515/sab-2015-0021
work_keys_str_mv AT brozovah identifyingthedisadvantagedregionsforconcentratedstatesupportusingthedeamethod
AT hornickaa identifyingthedisadvantagedregionsforconcentratedstatesupportusingthedeamethod
_version_ 1717812023655399424