Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons

Introduction : Patients′ perceptions and expectations regarding their appearance play a significant role in treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to compare the perceptions of orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons regarding smile esthetics after symmetrical and asymmetrical alt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Santosh Kumar, Sumit Gandhi, Ashima Valiathan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2012;volume=23;issue=2;spage=295;epage=295;aulast=Kumar
id doaj-cbcfcc6d7bbf4a40a65391f718cecf1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cbcfcc6d7bbf4a40a65391f718cecf1d2020-11-24T23:12:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032012-01-0123229529510.4103/0970-9290.100456Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersonsSantosh KumarSumit GandhiAshima ValiathanIntroduction : Patients′ perceptions and expectations regarding their appearance play a significant role in treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to compare the perceptions of orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons regarding smile esthetics after symmetrical and asymmetrical alterations in anterior teeth and their supporting tissues. Materials and Methods: Alterations were made in the crown length, crown width, midline diastema, and gingiva-to-lip relationship of the maxillary anterior teeth in the close-up photograph of a woman′s smile. The attractiveness of the smile in the original image and in each of the modified images were assessed by orthodontists (n=40), dentists (n=40), and laypersons (n=40) and scored using a visual analog scale (VAS). The mean VAS scores were calculated for each photograph. ANOVA was used for comparisons between photographs and between groups. To determine threshold levels at which each group discriminated between esthetic and less esthetic dental features were determined by one-way ANOVA (F-test) followed by Newman-Keul′s range test. Results : Orthodontists were found to be more critical when evaluating smile images compared to general dentists and laypersons. Symmetrical or asymmetrical alterations in the mesio-distal width of the lateral incisor of up to 2 mm was not perceived as unesthetic by general dentists and laypersons. Conclusion: Laypersons are more accepting of minor variations in anterior tooth size and alignment than orthodontists.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2012;volume=23;issue=2;spage=295;epage=295;aulast=KumarEstheticsperceptionsmile
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Santosh Kumar
Sumit Gandhi
Ashima Valiathan
spellingShingle Santosh Kumar
Sumit Gandhi
Ashima Valiathan
Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Esthetics
perception
smile
author_facet Santosh Kumar
Sumit Gandhi
Ashima Valiathan
author_sort Santosh Kumar
title Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons
title_short Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons
title_full Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons
title_fullStr Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons
title_full_unstemmed Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons
title_sort perception of smile esthetics among indian dental professionals and laypersons
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Introduction : Patients′ perceptions and expectations regarding their appearance play a significant role in treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to compare the perceptions of orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons regarding smile esthetics after symmetrical and asymmetrical alterations in anterior teeth and their supporting tissues. Materials and Methods: Alterations were made in the crown length, crown width, midline diastema, and gingiva-to-lip relationship of the maxillary anterior teeth in the close-up photograph of a woman′s smile. The attractiveness of the smile in the original image and in each of the modified images were assessed by orthodontists (n=40), dentists (n=40), and laypersons (n=40) and scored using a visual analog scale (VAS). The mean VAS scores were calculated for each photograph. ANOVA was used for comparisons between photographs and between groups. To determine threshold levels at which each group discriminated between esthetic and less esthetic dental features were determined by one-way ANOVA (F-test) followed by Newman-Keul′s range test. Results : Orthodontists were found to be more critical when evaluating smile images compared to general dentists and laypersons. Symmetrical or asymmetrical alterations in the mesio-distal width of the lateral incisor of up to 2 mm was not perceived as unesthetic by general dentists and laypersons. Conclusion: Laypersons are more accepting of minor variations in anterior tooth size and alignment than orthodontists.
topic Esthetics
perception
smile
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2012;volume=23;issue=2;spage=295;epage=295;aulast=Kumar
work_keys_str_mv AT santoshkumar perceptionofsmileestheticsamongindiandentalprofessionalsandlaypersons
AT sumitgandhi perceptionofsmileestheticsamongindiandentalprofessionalsandlaypersons
AT ashimavaliathan perceptionofsmileestheticsamongindiandentalprofessionalsandlaypersons
_version_ 1725600739774955520