Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-XIV/2016 Related to LGBT and Community Attitude
The Constitutional Court in Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 had pros and cons in the community. One of the materials that became the pros and cons of the decision was regarding the existence of LGBT. This study discusses the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016, especi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Negeri Semarang
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Law and Legal Reform |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jllr/article/view/35767 |
| Summary: | The Constitutional Court in Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 had pros and cons in the community. One of the materials that became the pros and cons of the decision was regarding the existence of LGBT. This study discusses the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016, especially concerning LGBT. There are two important topics contained in this study, namely (1) normative juridical analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 related to LGBT and (2) community attitudes towards LGBT after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 This study concludes that Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 is legally normative and does not conflict with statutory regulations. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 actually refers to the laws and regulations that govern the provisions of the ruling for the Constitutional Court. The attitude of the community related to LGBT after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 was in fact influenced by various factors |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2715-0941 2715-0968 |