A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT
Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most urgent problems of modern oncourology because of the continuing high incidence of this pathology. The main methods of radical treatment of patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer are radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy – remote (RR...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
QUASAR, LLC
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Issledovaniâ i Praktika v Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/158 |
id |
doaj-cbb9e3ccdfa248ec9a5df3681e427fbb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
B. Y. Alekseev K. M. Nyushko S. A. Reva A. K. Nosov D. G. Prokhorov T. T. Andabekov А. А. Krasheninnikov E. Y. Safronova А. S. Kalpinskiy M. А. Gusniev A. D. Kaprin |
spellingShingle |
B. Y. Alekseev K. M. Nyushko S. A. Reva A. K. Nosov D. G. Prokhorov T. T. Andabekov А. А. Krasheninnikov E. Y. Safronova А. S. Kalpinskiy M. А. Gusniev A. D. Kaprin A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT Issledovaniâ i Praktika v Medicine prostate cancer oligometastasis nodal progression the saving salvaging lymph node dissection immediate and long-term results of treatment multi-center study |
author_facet |
B. Y. Alekseev K. M. Nyushko S. A. Reva A. K. Nosov D. G. Prokhorov T. T. Andabekov А. А. Krasheninnikov E. Y. Safronova А. S. Kalpinskiy M. А. Gusniev A. D. Kaprin |
author_sort |
B. Y. Alekseev |
title |
A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT |
title_short |
A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT |
title_full |
A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT |
title_fullStr |
A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT |
title_full_unstemmed |
A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT |
title_sort |
multicentre study of assessing the effectiveness of salvaging lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after the radical treatment |
publisher |
QUASAR, LLC |
series |
Issledovaniâ i Praktika v Medicine |
issn |
2409-2231 2410-1893 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most urgent problems of modern oncourology because of the continuing high incidence of this pathology. The main methods of radical treatment of patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer are radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy – remote (RRT) or brachytherapy. However, the frequency of biochemical markers of disease progression after curative treatment is high and reaches up to 27–53%. It is extremely important to find the tumor lesion that leads to the increase of the marker. The palliative hormone therapy (PHT) was the only accepted method in patients with occurrence of distant metastases in recent time. However, a significant number of patients relapse marker may be associated with the so-called oligo-metastatic disease progression, in which the number of detected metastatic lesions is minimal. As the results of the research, the use of surgical or radiological treatment in selected patients of this cohort can significantly increase the length of time prior to the appointment of HT, and in some cases completely abandon its holding.Purpose. To evaluate the results of the saving pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after radical therapies.Patients and methods. The article summarizes the results of surgical treatment of patients who have undergone life-saving lymphadenectomy about oligo-nodal metastatic progression of prostate cancer after treatment in 3 centers – P. Hertsen MORI, the branch of NMRRC; N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology and Russian scientific center of radiology and surgical technologies. In this multicenter study they evaluated the immediate and remote results of surgical treatment of 57 patients.Results. The results performed the high efficiency of the method of the saving pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after radical treatment. So, response to therapy and reduction in the marker level was observed in 47 (82.5%) patients. The decline in PSA level ≥50% from initial level in a month after the operation was in 38 (66,7%) patients. A complete answer in the form of lower marker ≤0.2 ng/ml was observed in 13 (22,8%) patients. For the entire median follow-up period of 12 months, patients with complete response to therapy had received any hormonal treatment.Conclusion. The saving pelvic lymphadenectomy is an effective method for the treatment of patients with the presence of lymphogenic progression of prostate cancer after a radical treatment with satisfactory oncological results. A significant contingent of patients, SLE is associated with good response to therapy and reduction in PSA levels and long disease-free period. In some patients the removal of nodal metastases allows to postpone or to abandon the HT and hope to increase overall survival of patients. |
topic |
prostate cancer oligometastasis nodal progression the saving salvaging lymph node dissection immediate and long-term results of treatment multi-center study |
url |
https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/158 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT byalekseev amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT kmnyushko amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT sareva amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT aknosov amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT dgprokhorov amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT ttandabekov amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT aakrasheninnikov amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT eysafronova amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT askalpinskiy amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT magusniev amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT adkaprin amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT byalekseev multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT kmnyushko multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT sareva multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT aknosov multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT dgprokhorov multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT ttandabekov multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT aakrasheninnikov multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT eysafronova multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT askalpinskiy multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT magusniev multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment AT adkaprin multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment |
_version_ |
1721236891634761728 |
spelling |
doaj-cbb9e3ccdfa248ec9a5df3681e427fbb2021-08-02T08:54:21ZrusQUASAR, LLCIssledovaniâ i Praktika v Medicine2409-22312410-18932016-12-013481810.17709/2409-2231-2016-3-4-1120A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENTB. Y. Alekseev0K. M. Nyushko1S. A. Reva2A. K. Nosov3D. G. Prokhorov4T. T. Andabekov5А. А. Krasheninnikov6E. Y. Safronova7А. S. Kalpinskiy8M. А. Gusniev9A. D. Kaprin10P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreN. Petrov Research Institute of OncologyN. Petrov Research Institute of OncologyRussian scientific center of radiology and surgical technologiesRussian scientific center of radiology and surgical technologiesP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreProstate cancer (PC) is one of the most urgent problems of modern oncourology because of the continuing high incidence of this pathology. The main methods of radical treatment of patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer are radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy – remote (RRT) or brachytherapy. However, the frequency of biochemical markers of disease progression after curative treatment is high and reaches up to 27–53%. It is extremely important to find the tumor lesion that leads to the increase of the marker. The palliative hormone therapy (PHT) was the only accepted method in patients with occurrence of distant metastases in recent time. However, a significant number of patients relapse marker may be associated with the so-called oligo-metastatic disease progression, in which the number of detected metastatic lesions is minimal. As the results of the research, the use of surgical or radiological treatment in selected patients of this cohort can significantly increase the length of time prior to the appointment of HT, and in some cases completely abandon its holding.Purpose. To evaluate the results of the saving pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after radical therapies.Patients and methods. The article summarizes the results of surgical treatment of patients who have undergone life-saving lymphadenectomy about oligo-nodal metastatic progression of prostate cancer after treatment in 3 centers – P. Hertsen MORI, the branch of NMRRC; N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology and Russian scientific center of radiology and surgical technologies. In this multicenter study they evaluated the immediate and remote results of surgical treatment of 57 patients.Results. The results performed the high efficiency of the method of the saving pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after radical treatment. So, response to therapy and reduction in the marker level was observed in 47 (82.5%) patients. The decline in PSA level ≥50% from initial level in a month after the operation was in 38 (66,7%) patients. A complete answer in the form of lower marker ≤0.2 ng/ml was observed in 13 (22,8%) patients. For the entire median follow-up period of 12 months, patients with complete response to therapy had received any hormonal treatment.Conclusion. The saving pelvic lymphadenectomy is an effective method for the treatment of patients with the presence of lymphogenic progression of prostate cancer after a radical treatment with satisfactory oncological results. A significant contingent of patients, SLE is associated with good response to therapy and reduction in PSA levels and long disease-free period. In some patients the removal of nodal metastases allows to postpone or to abandon the HT and hope to increase overall survival of patients.https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/158prostate canceroligometastasisnodal progressionthe saving salvaging lymph node dissectionimmediate and long-term results of treatmentmulti-center study |