A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most urgent problems of modern oncourology because of the continuing high incidence of this pathology. The main methods of radical treatment of patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer are radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy – remote (RR...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Y. Alekseev, K. M. Nyushko, S. A. Reva, A. K. Nosov, D. G. Prokhorov, T. T. Andabekov, А. А. Krasheninnikov, E. Y. Safronova, А. S. Kalpinskiy, M. А. Gusniev, A. D. Kaprin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: QUASAR, LLC 2016-12-01
Series:Issledovaniâ i Praktika v Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/158
id doaj-cbb9e3ccdfa248ec9a5df3681e427fbb
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Y. Alekseev
K. M. Nyushko
S. A. Reva
A. K. Nosov
D. G. Prokhorov
T. T. Andabekov
А. А. Krasheninnikov
E. Y. Safronova
А. S. Kalpinskiy
M. А. Gusniev
A. D. Kaprin
spellingShingle B. Y. Alekseev
K. M. Nyushko
S. A. Reva
A. K. Nosov
D. G. Prokhorov
T. T. Andabekov
А. А. Krasheninnikov
E. Y. Safronova
А. S. Kalpinskiy
M. А. Gusniev
A. D. Kaprin
A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT
Issledovaniâ i Praktika v Medicine
prostate cancer
oligometastasis
nodal progression
the saving salvaging lymph node dissection
immediate and long-term results of treatment
multi-center study
author_facet B. Y. Alekseev
K. M. Nyushko
S. A. Reva
A. K. Nosov
D. G. Prokhorov
T. T. Andabekov
А. А. Krasheninnikov
E. Y. Safronova
А. S. Kalpinskiy
M. А. Gusniev
A. D. Kaprin
author_sort B. Y. Alekseev
title A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT
title_short A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT
title_full A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT
title_fullStr A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT
title_full_unstemmed A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENT
title_sort multicentre study of assessing the effectiveness of salvaging lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after the radical treatment
publisher QUASAR, LLC
series Issledovaniâ i Praktika v Medicine
issn 2409-2231
2410-1893
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most urgent problems of modern oncourology because of the continuing high incidence of this pathology. The main methods of radical treatment of patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer are radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy – remote (RRT) or brachytherapy.  However, the frequency of biochemical markers of disease progression after curative treatment is high and reaches up to 27–53%. It is extremely important to find the tumor lesion that leads to the increase of the marker. The  palliative hormone therapy (PHT) was the only accepted method in patients with occurrence of distant metastases in recent time. However, a significant number of patients relapse marker may be associated with the so-called oligo-metastatic disease progression, in which the number of detected metastatic lesions is minimal. As the results of the research, the use of surgical or radiological treatment in selected patients of this cohort can significantly increase the length of time prior to the appointment of HT, and in some cases completely abandon its holding.Purpose. To evaluate the results of the saving pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after radical therapies.Patients and methods. The article summarizes the results of surgical treatment of patients who have undergone life-saving lymphadenectomy about oligo-nodal metastatic progression of prostate cancer after treatment in 3 centers – P. Hertsen MORI, the branch of NMRRC; N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology and Russian scientific center of radiology and surgical technologies. In this multicenter study they evaluated the immediate and remote results of surgical treatment of 57 patients.Results. The results performed the high efficiency of the method of the saving pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after radical treatment. So, response to therapy and reduction in the marker level was observed in 47 (82.5%) patients. The decline in PSA level ≥50% from initial level in a month after the operation was in 38 (66,7%) patients. A complete answer in the form of lower marker ≤0.2 ng/ml was observed in 13 (22,8%) patients. For the entire median follow-up period of 12 months, patients with complete response to therapy had received any hormonal treatment.Conclusion. The saving pelvic lymphadenectomy is an effective method for the treatment of patients with the presence of lymphogenic progression of prostate cancer after a radical treatment with satisfactory oncological results. A significant contingent of patients, SLE is associated with good response to therapy and reduction in PSA levels and long disease-free period. In some patients the removal of nodal metastases allows to postpone or to abandon the HT and hope to increase overall survival of patients.
topic prostate cancer
oligometastasis
nodal progression
the saving salvaging lymph node dissection
immediate and long-term results of treatment
multi-center study
url https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/158
work_keys_str_mv AT byalekseev amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT kmnyushko amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT sareva amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT aknosov amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT dgprokhorov amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT ttandabekov amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT aakrasheninnikov amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT eysafronova amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT askalpinskiy amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT magusniev amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT adkaprin amulticentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT byalekseev multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT kmnyushko multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT sareva multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT aknosov multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT dgprokhorov multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT ttandabekov multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT aakrasheninnikov multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT eysafronova multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT askalpinskiy multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT magusniev multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
AT adkaprin multicentrestudyofassessingtheeffectivenessofsalvaginglymphadenectomyinpatientswithprostatecancerwithdiseaseprogressionaftertheradicaltreatment
_version_ 1721236891634761728
spelling doaj-cbb9e3ccdfa248ec9a5df3681e427fbb2021-08-02T08:54:21ZrusQUASAR, LLCIssledovaniâ i Praktika v Medicine2409-22312410-18932016-12-013481810.17709/2409-2231-2016-3-4-1120A MULTICENTRE STUDY OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SALVAGING LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER WITH DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER THE RADICAL TREATMENTB. Y. Alekseev0K. M. Nyushko1S. A. Reva2A. K. Nosov3D. G. Prokhorov4T. T. Andabekov5А. А. Krasheninnikov6E. Y. Safronova7А. S. Kalpinskiy8M. А. Gusniev9A. D. Kaprin10P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreN. Petrov Research Institute of OncologyN. Petrov Research Institute of OncologyRussian scientific center of radiology and surgical technologiesRussian scientific center of radiology and surgical technologiesP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreP. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological CentreProstate cancer (PC) is one of the most urgent problems of modern oncourology because of the continuing high incidence of this pathology. The main methods of radical treatment of patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer are radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy – remote (RRT) or brachytherapy.  However, the frequency of biochemical markers of disease progression after curative treatment is high and reaches up to 27–53%. It is extremely important to find the tumor lesion that leads to the increase of the marker. The  palliative hormone therapy (PHT) was the only accepted method in patients with occurrence of distant metastases in recent time. However, a significant number of patients relapse marker may be associated with the so-called oligo-metastatic disease progression, in which the number of detected metastatic lesions is minimal. As the results of the research, the use of surgical or radiological treatment in selected patients of this cohort can significantly increase the length of time prior to the appointment of HT, and in some cases completely abandon its holding.Purpose. To evaluate the results of the saving pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after radical therapies.Patients and methods. The article summarizes the results of surgical treatment of patients who have undergone life-saving lymphadenectomy about oligo-nodal metastatic progression of prostate cancer after treatment in 3 centers – P. Hertsen MORI, the branch of NMRRC; N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology and Russian scientific center of radiology and surgical technologies. In this multicenter study they evaluated the immediate and remote results of surgical treatment of 57 patients.Results. The results performed the high efficiency of the method of the saving pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer with disease progression after radical treatment. So, response to therapy and reduction in the marker level was observed in 47 (82.5%) patients. The decline in PSA level ≥50% from initial level in a month after the operation was in 38 (66,7%) patients. A complete answer in the form of lower marker ≤0.2 ng/ml was observed in 13 (22,8%) patients. For the entire median follow-up period of 12 months, patients with complete response to therapy had received any hormonal treatment.Conclusion. The saving pelvic lymphadenectomy is an effective method for the treatment of patients with the presence of lymphogenic progression of prostate cancer after a radical treatment with satisfactory oncological results. A significant contingent of patients, SLE is associated with good response to therapy and reduction in PSA levels and long disease-free period. In some patients the removal of nodal metastases allows to postpone or to abandon the HT and hope to increase overall survival of patients.https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/158prostate canceroligometastasisnodal progressionthe saving salvaging lymph node dissectionimmediate and long-term results of treatmentmulti-center study