A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol
Introduction Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) is commonly carried as a commensal bacterium in the nasopharynx but can cause life-threatening disease. Transmission occurs by human respiratory droplets and interruption of this process provides herd immunity. A 2017 WHO Consultation on Optim...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-06-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e050312.full |
id |
doaj-cbb54fa7203f483f8de8f593ca716b5b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ana Ibarz-Pavon Neil French Charles Mwansambo Robert S Heyderman Stephen B Gordon James Chirombo Andrea Gori Todd D Swarthout Gift Kawalazira George Sinjani Peter Chalusa Farouck Bonomali Roseline Nyirenda Edwin Bulla Comfort Brown Jacquline Msefula Marjory Banda Jean Kachala Marc YR Henrion |
spellingShingle |
Ana Ibarz-Pavon Neil French Charles Mwansambo Robert S Heyderman Stephen B Gordon James Chirombo Andrea Gori Todd D Swarthout Gift Kawalazira George Sinjani Peter Chalusa Farouck Bonomali Roseline Nyirenda Edwin Bulla Comfort Brown Jacquline Msefula Marjory Banda Jean Kachala Marc YR Henrion A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol BMJ Open |
author_facet |
Ana Ibarz-Pavon Neil French Charles Mwansambo Robert S Heyderman Stephen B Gordon James Chirombo Andrea Gori Todd D Swarthout Gift Kawalazira George Sinjani Peter Chalusa Farouck Bonomali Roseline Nyirenda Edwin Bulla Comfort Brown Jacquline Msefula Marjory Banda Jean Kachala Marc YR Henrion |
author_sort |
Ana Ibarz-Pavon |
title |
A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol |
title_short |
A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol |
title_full |
A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol |
title_fullStr |
A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol |
title_sort |
pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a pcv13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in malawi: a study protocol |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
BMJ Open |
issn |
2044-6055 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Introduction Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) is commonly carried as a commensal bacterium in the nasopharynx but can cause life-threatening disease. Transmission occurs by human respiratory droplets and interruption of this process provides herd immunity. A 2017 WHO Consultation on Optimisation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) Impact highlighted a substantial research gap in investigating why the impact of PCV vaccines in low-income countries has been lower than expected. Malawi introduced the 13-valent PCV (PCV13) into the national Expanded Programme of Immunisations in 2011, using a 3+0 (3 primary +0 booster doses) schedule. With evidence of greater impact of a 2+1 (2 primary +1 booster dose) schedule in other settings, including South Africa, Malawi’s National Immunisations Technical Advisory Group is seeking evidence of adequate superiority of a 2+1 schedule to inform vaccine policy.Methods A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing impact of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in Blantyre district, Malawi. Twenty government health centres will be randomly selected, with ten implementing a 2+1 and 10 to continue with the 3+0 schedule. Health centres implementing 3+0 will serve as the direct comparator in evaluating 2+1 providing superior direct and indirect protection against pneumococcal carriage. Pneumococcal carriage surveys will evaluate carriage prevalence among children 15–24 months, randomised at household level, and schoolgoers 5–10 years of age, randomly selected from school registers. Carriage surveys will be conducted 18 and 33 months following 2+1 implementation.Analysis The primary endpoint is powered to detect an effect size of 50% reduction in vaccine serotype (VT) carriage among vaccinated children 15–24 months old, expecting a 14% and 7% VT carriage prevalence in the 3+0 and 2+1 arms, respectively.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (COMREC; Ref: P05.19.2680), the University College London Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 8603.002) and the University of Liverpool Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 5439). The results from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT04078997. |
url |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e050312.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anaibarzpavon apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT neilfrench apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT charlesmwansambo apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT robertsheyderman apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT stephenbgordon apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT jameschirombo apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT andreagori apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT todddswarthout apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT giftkawalazira apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT georgesinjani apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT peterchalusa apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT farouckbonomali apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT roselinenyirenda apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT edwinbulla apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT comfortbrown apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT jacqulinemsefula apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT marjorybanda apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT jeankachala apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT marcyrhenrion apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT anaibarzpavon pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT neilfrench pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT charlesmwansambo pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT robertsheyderman pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT stephenbgordon pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT jameschirombo pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT andreagori pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT todddswarthout pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT giftkawalazira pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT georgesinjani pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT peterchalusa pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT farouckbonomali pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT roselinenyirenda pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT edwinbulla pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT comfortbrown pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT jacqulinemsefula pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT marjorybanda pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT jeankachala pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol AT marcyrhenrion pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol |
_version_ |
1721216884351696896 |
spelling |
doaj-cbb54fa7203f483f8de8f593ca716b5b2021-08-07T17:02:01ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-06-0111610.1136/bmjopen-2021-050312A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocolAna Ibarz-Pavon0Neil French1Charles Mwansambo2Robert S Heyderman3Stephen B Gordon4James Chirombo5Andrea Gori6Todd D Swarthout7Gift Kawalazira8George Sinjani9Peter Chalusa10Farouck Bonomali11Roseline Nyirenda12Edwin Bulla13Comfort Brown14Jacquline Msefula15Marjory Banda16Jean Kachala17Marc YR Henrion181 The Centre for Global Vaccine Research, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Department of Clinical Infection Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK9 Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi1 Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, MalawiInfectious Diseases Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalyNIHR Global Health Research Unit on Mucosal Pathogens, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UKMinistry of Health, Lilongwe, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMinistry of Education, Blantyre, MalawiMinistry of Health, Lilongwe, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiIntroduction Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) is commonly carried as a commensal bacterium in the nasopharynx but can cause life-threatening disease. Transmission occurs by human respiratory droplets and interruption of this process provides herd immunity. A 2017 WHO Consultation on Optimisation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) Impact highlighted a substantial research gap in investigating why the impact of PCV vaccines in low-income countries has been lower than expected. Malawi introduced the 13-valent PCV (PCV13) into the national Expanded Programme of Immunisations in 2011, using a 3+0 (3 primary +0 booster doses) schedule. With evidence of greater impact of a 2+1 (2 primary +1 booster dose) schedule in other settings, including South Africa, Malawi’s National Immunisations Technical Advisory Group is seeking evidence of adequate superiority of a 2+1 schedule to inform vaccine policy.Methods A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing impact of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in Blantyre district, Malawi. Twenty government health centres will be randomly selected, with ten implementing a 2+1 and 10 to continue with the 3+0 schedule. Health centres implementing 3+0 will serve as the direct comparator in evaluating 2+1 providing superior direct and indirect protection against pneumococcal carriage. Pneumococcal carriage surveys will evaluate carriage prevalence among children 15–24 months, randomised at household level, and schoolgoers 5–10 years of age, randomly selected from school registers. Carriage surveys will be conducted 18 and 33 months following 2+1 implementation.Analysis The primary endpoint is powered to detect an effect size of 50% reduction in vaccine serotype (VT) carriage among vaccinated children 15–24 months old, expecting a 14% and 7% VT carriage prevalence in the 3+0 and 2+1 arms, respectively.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (COMREC; Ref: P05.19.2680), the University College London Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 8603.002) and the University of Liverpool Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 5439). The results from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT04078997.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e050312.full |