A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol

Introduction Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) is commonly carried as a commensal bacterium in the nasopharynx but can cause life-threatening disease. Transmission occurs by human respiratory droplets and interruption of this process provides herd immunity. A 2017 WHO Consultation on Optim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Ibarz-Pavon, Neil French, Charles Mwansambo, Robert S Heyderman, Stephen B Gordon, James Chirombo, Andrea Gori, Todd D Swarthout, Gift Kawalazira, George Sinjani, Peter Chalusa, Farouck Bonomali, Roseline Nyirenda, Edwin Bulla, Comfort Brown, Jacquline Msefula, Marjory Banda, Jean Kachala, Marc YR Henrion
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e050312.full
id doaj-cbb54fa7203f483f8de8f593ca716b5b
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Ibarz-Pavon
Neil French
Charles Mwansambo
Robert S Heyderman
Stephen B Gordon
James Chirombo
Andrea Gori
Todd D Swarthout
Gift Kawalazira
George Sinjani
Peter Chalusa
Farouck Bonomali
Roseline Nyirenda
Edwin Bulla
Comfort Brown
Jacquline Msefula
Marjory Banda
Jean Kachala
Marc YR Henrion
spellingShingle Ana Ibarz-Pavon
Neil French
Charles Mwansambo
Robert S Heyderman
Stephen B Gordon
James Chirombo
Andrea Gori
Todd D Swarthout
Gift Kawalazira
George Sinjani
Peter Chalusa
Farouck Bonomali
Roseline Nyirenda
Edwin Bulla
Comfort Brown
Jacquline Msefula
Marjory Banda
Jean Kachala
Marc YR Henrion
A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol
BMJ Open
author_facet Ana Ibarz-Pavon
Neil French
Charles Mwansambo
Robert S Heyderman
Stephen B Gordon
James Chirombo
Andrea Gori
Todd D Swarthout
Gift Kawalazira
George Sinjani
Peter Chalusa
Farouck Bonomali
Roseline Nyirenda
Edwin Bulla
Comfort Brown
Jacquline Msefula
Marjory Banda
Jean Kachala
Marc YR Henrion
author_sort Ana Ibarz-Pavon
title A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol
title_short A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol
title_full A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol
title_fullStr A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocol
title_sort pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a pcv13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in malawi: a study protocol
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Introduction Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) is commonly carried as a commensal bacterium in the nasopharynx but can cause life-threatening disease. Transmission occurs by human respiratory droplets and interruption of this process provides herd immunity. A 2017 WHO Consultation on Optimisation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) Impact highlighted a substantial research gap in investigating why the impact of PCV vaccines in low-income countries has been lower than expected. Malawi introduced the 13-valent PCV (PCV13) into the national Expanded Programme of Immunisations in 2011, using a 3+0 (3 primary +0 booster doses) schedule. With evidence of greater impact of a 2+1 (2 primary +1 booster dose) schedule in other settings, including South Africa, Malawi’s National Immunisations Technical Advisory Group is seeking evidence of adequate superiority of a 2+1 schedule to inform vaccine policy.Methods A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing impact of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in Blantyre district, Malawi. Twenty government health centres will be randomly selected, with ten implementing a 2+1 and 10 to continue with the 3+0 schedule. Health centres implementing 3+0 will serve as the direct comparator in evaluating 2+1 providing superior direct and indirect protection against pneumococcal carriage. Pneumococcal carriage surveys will evaluate carriage prevalence among children 15–24 months, randomised at household level, and schoolgoers 5–10 years of age, randomly selected from school registers. Carriage surveys will be conducted 18 and 33 months following 2+1 implementation.Analysis The primary endpoint is powered to detect an effect size of 50% reduction in vaccine serotype (VT) carriage among vaccinated children 15–24 months old, expecting a 14% and 7% VT carriage prevalence in the 3+0 and 2+1 arms, respectively.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (COMREC; Ref: P05.19.2680), the University College London Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 8603.002) and the University of Liverpool Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 5439). The results from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT04078997.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e050312.full
work_keys_str_mv AT anaibarzpavon apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT neilfrench apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT charlesmwansambo apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT robertsheyderman apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT stephenbgordon apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT jameschirombo apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT andreagori apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT todddswarthout apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT giftkawalazira apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT georgesinjani apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT peterchalusa apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT farouckbonomali apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT roselinenyirenda apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT edwinbulla apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT comfortbrown apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT jacqulinemsefula apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT marjorybanda apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT jeankachala apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT marcyrhenrion apragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT anaibarzpavon pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT neilfrench pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT charlesmwansambo pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT robertsheyderman pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT stephenbgordon pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT jameschirombo pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT andreagori pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT todddswarthout pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT giftkawalazira pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT georgesinjani pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT peterchalusa pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT farouckbonomali pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT roselinenyirenda pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT edwinbulla pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT comfortbrown pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT jacqulinemsefula pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT marjorybanda pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT jeankachala pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
AT marcyrhenrion pragmatichealthcentrebasedevaluationcomparingtheeffectivenessofapcv13schedulechangefrom30to21inahighpneumococcalcarriageanddiseaseburdensettinginmalawiastudyprotocol
_version_ 1721216884351696896
spelling doaj-cbb54fa7203f483f8de8f593ca716b5b2021-08-07T17:02:01ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-06-0111610.1136/bmjopen-2021-050312A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing the effectiveness of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in a high pneumococcal carriage and disease burden setting in Malawi: a study protocolAna Ibarz-Pavon0Neil French1Charles Mwansambo2Robert S Heyderman3Stephen B Gordon4James Chirombo5Andrea Gori6Todd D Swarthout7Gift Kawalazira8George Sinjani9Peter Chalusa10Farouck Bonomali11Roseline Nyirenda12Edwin Bulla13Comfort Brown14Jacquline Msefula15Marjory Banda16Jean Kachala17Marc YR Henrion181 The Centre for Global Vaccine Research, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Department of Clinical Infection Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK9 Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi1 Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, MalawiInfectious Diseases Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, ItalyNIHR Global Health Research Unit on Mucosal Pathogens, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UKMinistry of Health, Lilongwe, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiMinistry of Education, Blantyre, MalawiMinistry of Health, Lilongwe, MalawiMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, MalawiIntroduction Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) is commonly carried as a commensal bacterium in the nasopharynx but can cause life-threatening disease. Transmission occurs by human respiratory droplets and interruption of this process provides herd immunity. A 2017 WHO Consultation on Optimisation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) Impact highlighted a substantial research gap in investigating why the impact of PCV vaccines in low-income countries has been lower than expected. Malawi introduced the 13-valent PCV (PCV13) into the national Expanded Programme of Immunisations in 2011, using a 3+0 (3 primary +0 booster doses) schedule. With evidence of greater impact of a 2+1 (2 primary +1 booster dose) schedule in other settings, including South Africa, Malawi’s National Immunisations Technical Advisory Group is seeking evidence of adequate superiority of a 2+1 schedule to inform vaccine policy.Methods A pragmatic health centre-based evaluation comparing impact of a PCV13 schedule change from 3+0 to 2+1 in Blantyre district, Malawi. Twenty government health centres will be randomly selected, with ten implementing a 2+1 and 10 to continue with the 3+0 schedule. Health centres implementing 3+0 will serve as the direct comparator in evaluating 2+1 providing superior direct and indirect protection against pneumococcal carriage. Pneumococcal carriage surveys will evaluate carriage prevalence among children 15–24 months, randomised at household level, and schoolgoers 5–10 years of age, randomly selected from school registers. Carriage surveys will be conducted 18 and 33 months following 2+1 implementation.Analysis The primary endpoint is powered to detect an effect size of 50% reduction in vaccine serotype (VT) carriage among vaccinated children 15–24 months old, expecting a 14% and 7% VT carriage prevalence in the 3+0 and 2+1 arms, respectively.Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (COMREC; Ref: P05.19.2680), the University College London Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 8603.002) and the University of Liverpool Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 5439). The results from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.Trial registration number NCT04078997.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e050312.full