Investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors

Objective To investigate the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea (HFCSFR) after endoscopic resection of skull base tumors. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 5 patients with repair failure of HFCSFR after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors in ou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-li MENG, Jing-hai WAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tianjin Huanhu Hospital 2019-04-01
Series:Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cjcnn.org/index.php/cjcnn/article/view/1937
id doaj-cba66f4014014eb8b8ab333699bdb3f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cba66f4014014eb8b8ab333699bdb3f92020-11-25T00:36:59ZengTianjin Huanhu HospitalChinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery1672-67312019-04-011942372431892Investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumorsXiao-li MENG0Jing-hai WAN1Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College; National Cancer Center; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Beijing 100021, ChinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College; National Cancer Center; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Beijing 100021, ChinaObjective To investigate the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea (HFCSFR) after endoscopic resection of skull base tumors. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 5 patients with repair failure of HFCSFR after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors in our center from December 2012 to June 2016. The patients underwent reoperations for skull base repair. The reasons of repair failure and management strategies were analyzed. Results The reconstruction methods of skull base in the reoperation for HFCSFR included autologous fat inlay and autologous pedicled nasal septal flap onlay in one patient, autologous fat inlay and autologous fascia lata onlay in one patient, and autologous fat inlay and autologous fascia lata onlay and autologous pedicled nasal septal flap in 3 patients. The skull base was reconstructed well in 5 patients. The mean follow-up period was 20 months, and no HFCSFR reoccurred in 5 patients. Conclusions Repair of HFCSFR and reconstruction of skull base are the key to endoscopic removal of skull base tumors. The reasons of repair failure included improperly employing synthetic dura mater, failing to obliterate the dead space left behind by removal of tumors with fat grafts or fat liquefaction, non-healing of middle turbinate and dura mater, failing to cover the dural defect onlay with fascia lata, displacement of the repair grafts, ischemia and necrosis of nasal septal flap. The surgeons should pay more attention to the repairment of HFCSFR after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors. Reconstruction with multilayer grafts and vascularized autologous flaps is an effective and safe strategy. Formulating detailed operation plan and strictly following surgical procedure could avoid repair failure. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2019.04.005http://www.cjcnn.org/index.php/cjcnn/article/view/1937Skull base neoplasmsEndoscopesCerebrospinal fluid rhinorrheaNeurosurgical proceduresReoperation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiao-li MENG
Jing-hai WAN
spellingShingle Xiao-li MENG
Jing-hai WAN
Investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
Skull base neoplasms
Endoscopes
Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea
Neurosurgical procedures
Reoperation
author_facet Xiao-li MENG
Jing-hai WAN
author_sort Xiao-li MENG
title Investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors
title_short Investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors
title_full Investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors
title_fullStr Investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors
title_sort investigation of the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors
publisher Tianjin Huanhu Hospital
series Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
issn 1672-6731
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Objective To investigate the reasons and management of repair failure of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea (HFCSFR) after endoscopic resection of skull base tumors. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 5 patients with repair failure of HFCSFR after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors in our center from December 2012 to June 2016. The patients underwent reoperations for skull base repair. The reasons of repair failure and management strategies were analyzed. Results The reconstruction methods of skull base in the reoperation for HFCSFR included autologous fat inlay and autologous pedicled nasal septal flap onlay in one patient, autologous fat inlay and autologous fascia lata onlay in one patient, and autologous fat inlay and autologous fascia lata onlay and autologous pedicled nasal septal flap in 3 patients. The skull base was reconstructed well in 5 patients. The mean follow-up period was 20 months, and no HFCSFR reoccurred in 5 patients. Conclusions Repair of HFCSFR and reconstruction of skull base are the key to endoscopic removal of skull base tumors. The reasons of repair failure included improperly employing synthetic dura mater, failing to obliterate the dead space left behind by removal of tumors with fat grafts or fat liquefaction, non-healing of middle turbinate and dura mater, failing to cover the dural defect onlay with fascia lata, displacement of the repair grafts, ischemia and necrosis of nasal septal flap. The surgeons should pay more attention to the repairment of HFCSFR after endoscopic removal of skull base tumors. Reconstruction with multilayer grafts and vascularized autologous flaps is an effective and safe strategy. Formulating detailed operation plan and strictly following surgical procedure could avoid repair failure. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2019.04.005
topic Skull base neoplasms
Endoscopes
Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea
Neurosurgical procedures
Reoperation
url http://www.cjcnn.org/index.php/cjcnn/article/view/1937
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaolimeng investigationofthereasonsandmanagementofrepairfailureofhighflowcerebrospinalfluidrhinorrheaafterendoscopicremovalofskullbasetumors
AT jinghaiwan investigationofthereasonsandmanagementofrepairfailureofhighflowcerebrospinalfluidrhinorrheaafterendoscopicremovalofskullbasetumors
_version_ 1725303157624406016