Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt

Background: The Egyptian model of care against hepatitis C virus (HCV) has a great success in treatment and treatment accessibility, but still screening efforts must be strengthened. HCV is a silent infection when most of infected people are unaware of their infection. EGCRISC is a newly developed a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Engy M. El-Ghitany
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-05-01
Series:Journal of Infection and Public Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034118301333
id doaj-cb6da9cd0e5348e58928c4bffa7092e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb6da9cd0e5348e58928c4bffa7092e92020-11-25T02:41:34ZengElsevierJournal of Infection and Public Health1876-03412019-05-01123442444Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in EgyptEngy M. El-Ghitany0Corresponding author.; Tropical Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, EgyptBackground: The Egyptian model of care against hepatitis C virus (HCV) has a great success in treatment and treatment accessibility, but still screening efforts must be strengthened. HCV is a silent infection when most of infected people are unaware of their infection. EGCRISC is a newly developed and validated risk-based HCV screening tool in Egypt that has shown a considerably good performance but is still underused. This brief communication is to analyze its use cost-effectiveness versus mass screening. Study design: Mathematical comparative analysis for economic evaluation. Methods: Its performance data as published recently were used, and a minimum cost of L.E. 20 was considered per one antibody testing. The 2015 health issue survey and population census were used for estimating the population, infected individuals and susceptibles. Results: The analysis showed that using EGCRISC would save LE 0.43 billion accounting for about 21,646,227 unnecessary tests, while missing less than 70,000 cases when compared to mass screening. Conclusion: EGCRISC is a cost-effective tool that must be adopted nationwide as soon as possible in Egypt for the best outcome of HCV control. Keywords: HCV, EGCRISC, Cost-effectiveness, Screeninghttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034118301333
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Engy M. El-Ghitany
spellingShingle Engy M. El-Ghitany
Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt
Journal of Infection and Public Health
author_facet Engy M. El-Ghitany
author_sort Engy M. El-Ghitany
title Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt
title_short Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt
title_full Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt
title_sort cost-effectiveness of egcrisc application versus hepatitis c virus mass screening in egypt
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Infection and Public Health
issn 1876-0341
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Background: The Egyptian model of care against hepatitis C virus (HCV) has a great success in treatment and treatment accessibility, but still screening efforts must be strengthened. HCV is a silent infection when most of infected people are unaware of their infection. EGCRISC is a newly developed and validated risk-based HCV screening tool in Egypt that has shown a considerably good performance but is still underused. This brief communication is to analyze its use cost-effectiveness versus mass screening. Study design: Mathematical comparative analysis for economic evaluation. Methods: Its performance data as published recently were used, and a minimum cost of L.E. 20 was considered per one antibody testing. The 2015 health issue survey and population census were used for estimating the population, infected individuals and susceptibles. Results: The analysis showed that using EGCRISC would save LE 0.43 billion accounting for about 21,646,227 unnecessary tests, while missing less than 70,000 cases when compared to mass screening. Conclusion: EGCRISC is a cost-effective tool that must be adopted nationwide as soon as possible in Egypt for the best outcome of HCV control. Keywords: HCV, EGCRISC, Cost-effectiveness, Screening
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034118301333
work_keys_str_mv AT engymelghitany costeffectivenessofegcriscapplicationversushepatitiscvirusmassscreeninginegypt
_version_ 1724777758461001728