Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt
Background: The Egyptian model of care against hepatitis C virus (HCV) has a great success in treatment and treatment accessibility, but still screening efforts must be strengthened. HCV is a silent infection when most of infected people are unaware of their infection. EGCRISC is a newly developed a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Infection and Public Health |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034118301333 |
id |
doaj-cb6da9cd0e5348e58928c4bffa7092e9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cb6da9cd0e5348e58928c4bffa7092e92020-11-25T02:41:34ZengElsevierJournal of Infection and Public Health1876-03412019-05-01123442444Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in EgyptEngy M. El-Ghitany0Corresponding author.; Tropical Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, EgyptBackground: The Egyptian model of care against hepatitis C virus (HCV) has a great success in treatment and treatment accessibility, but still screening efforts must be strengthened. HCV is a silent infection when most of infected people are unaware of their infection. EGCRISC is a newly developed and validated risk-based HCV screening tool in Egypt that has shown a considerably good performance but is still underused. This brief communication is to analyze its use cost-effectiveness versus mass screening. Study design: Mathematical comparative analysis for economic evaluation. Methods: Its performance data as published recently were used, and a minimum cost of L.E. 20 was considered per one antibody testing. The 2015 health issue survey and population census were used for estimating the population, infected individuals and susceptibles. Results: The analysis showed that using EGCRISC would save LE 0.43 billion accounting for about 21,646,227 unnecessary tests, while missing less than 70,000 cases when compared to mass screening. Conclusion: EGCRISC is a cost-effective tool that must be adopted nationwide as soon as possible in Egypt for the best outcome of HCV control. Keywords: HCV, EGCRISC, Cost-effectiveness, Screeninghttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034118301333 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Engy M. El-Ghitany |
spellingShingle |
Engy M. El-Ghitany Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt Journal of Infection and Public Health |
author_facet |
Engy M. El-Ghitany |
author_sort |
Engy M. El-Ghitany |
title |
Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt |
title_short |
Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt |
title_full |
Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt |
title_fullStr |
Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cost-effectiveness of EGCRISC application versus hepatitis C virus mass screening in Egypt |
title_sort |
cost-effectiveness of egcrisc application versus hepatitis c virus mass screening in egypt |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Journal of Infection and Public Health |
issn |
1876-0341 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Background: The Egyptian model of care against hepatitis C virus (HCV) has a great success in treatment and treatment accessibility, but still screening efforts must be strengthened. HCV is a silent infection when most of infected people are unaware of their infection. EGCRISC is a newly developed and validated risk-based HCV screening tool in Egypt that has shown a considerably good performance but is still underused. This brief communication is to analyze its use cost-effectiveness versus mass screening. Study design: Mathematical comparative analysis for economic evaluation. Methods: Its performance data as published recently were used, and a minimum cost of L.E. 20 was considered per one antibody testing. The 2015 health issue survey and population census were used for estimating the population, infected individuals and susceptibles. Results: The analysis showed that using EGCRISC would save LE 0.43 billion accounting for about 21,646,227 unnecessary tests, while missing less than 70,000 cases when compared to mass screening. Conclusion: EGCRISC is a cost-effective tool that must be adopted nationwide as soon as possible in Egypt for the best outcome of HCV control. Keywords: HCV, EGCRISC, Cost-effectiveness, Screening |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034118301333 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT engymelghitany costeffectivenessofegcriscapplicationversushepatitiscvirusmassscreeninginegypt |
_version_ |
1724777758461001728 |