Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation

In social-ecological systems, human activities and animal distribution are interrelated. Any effort at studying wildlife abundance therefore requires the integration of detailed socioeconomic context into species distribution models. Wild mammals have always been an important resource for humankind,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas Boesch, Roger Mundry, Hjalmar S. Kühl, Roger Berger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2017-12-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art36/
id doaj-cb69777bc37f4b2db0f0caf00e56e284
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb69777bc37f4b2db0f0caf00e56e2842020-11-24T23:47:35ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872017-12-012243610.5751/ES-09516-2204369516Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservationLukas Boesch0Roger Mundry1Hjalmar S. Kühl2Roger Berger3Universität Leipzig, Institut für Soziologie, Leipzig, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Primatology, Leipzig, GermanyUniversität Leipzig, Institut für Soziologie, Leipzig, GermanyIn social-ecological systems, human activities and animal distribution are interrelated. Any effort at studying wildlife abundance therefore requires the integration of detailed socioeconomic context into species distribution models. Wild mammals have always been an important resource for humankind, and concepts of economic goods provide an analytical framework to deduce relevant socioeconomic factors that shape wild mammal-human relationships and consequences for the spatial distribution patterns of wild mammals. We estimated the effects of the human population on wild mammals in a rural area in the Republic of Guinea, West Africa. We related large mammal survey data via statistical models to detailed socioeconomic information about the human population in the same area. We compared models, taking account of the human population in different ways, and found that wild mammal abundance was better explained by human factors other than human population density. Although human population density had a negative effect on wild mammals, the effect of market integration and food taboos were more important and not accounted for by human population density alone. Additionally, the analysis did not provide evidence of higher mammal abundance in classified forests, which one would assume if conservation interventions aimed at reducing hunting were implemented. Beyond doubt, the relationship between humans and wild mammals is highly complex and species- and context-specific. To understand mammal-human relationships in the wider context of social-ecological systems, an in-depth knowledge of the socioeconomic characteristics of a human population is needed to identify crucial links and driving mechanisms.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art36/economic goodhuman influencemammal abundanceRepublic of GuineaWest Africa
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lukas Boesch
Roger Mundry
Hjalmar S. Kühl
Roger Berger
spellingShingle Lukas Boesch
Roger Mundry
Hjalmar S. Kühl
Roger Berger
Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation
Ecology and Society
economic good
human influence
mammal abundance
Republic of Guinea
West Africa
author_facet Lukas Boesch
Roger Mundry
Hjalmar S. Kühl
Roger Berger
author_sort Lukas Boesch
title Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation
title_short Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation
title_full Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation
title_fullStr Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation
title_full_unstemmed Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation
title_sort wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2017-12-01
description In social-ecological systems, human activities and animal distribution are interrelated. Any effort at studying wildlife abundance therefore requires the integration of detailed socioeconomic context into species distribution models. Wild mammals have always been an important resource for humankind, and concepts of economic goods provide an analytical framework to deduce relevant socioeconomic factors that shape wild mammal-human relationships and consequences for the spatial distribution patterns of wild mammals. We estimated the effects of the human population on wild mammals in a rural area in the Republic of Guinea, West Africa. We related large mammal survey data via statistical models to detailed socioeconomic information about the human population in the same area. We compared models, taking account of the human population in different ways, and found that wild mammal abundance was better explained by human factors other than human population density. Although human population density had a negative effect on wild mammals, the effect of market integration and food taboos were more important and not accounted for by human population density alone. Additionally, the analysis did not provide evidence of higher mammal abundance in classified forests, which one would assume if conservation interventions aimed at reducing hunting were implemented. Beyond doubt, the relationship between humans and wild mammals is highly complex and species- and context-specific. To understand mammal-human relationships in the wider context of social-ecological systems, an in-depth knowledge of the socioeconomic characteristics of a human population is needed to identify crucial links and driving mechanisms.
topic economic good
human influence
mammal abundance
Republic of Guinea
West Africa
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss4/art36/
work_keys_str_mv AT lukasboesch wildmammalsaseconomicgoodsandimplicationsfortheirconservation
AT rogermundry wildmammalsaseconomicgoodsandimplicationsfortheirconservation
AT hjalmarskuhl wildmammalsaseconomicgoodsandimplicationsfortheirconservation
AT rogerberger wildmammalsaseconomicgoodsandimplicationsfortheirconservation
_version_ 1716271598728642560