Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact

A plethora of literature exists identifying the importance of engaging students in learning within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) undergraduate courses, making professional development (PD) for faculty teaching these courses vital. Yet few studies of PD programs focus on STEM facu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lindsay Wheeler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georgia Southern University 2021-05-01
Series:International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol15/iss1/7
id doaj-cb60862ec3e34ad7bfa232eb0cf47c0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb60862ec3e34ad7bfa232eb0cf47c0b2021-06-04T20:16:59ZengGeorgia Southern UniversityInternational Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1931-47442021-05-0115110.20429/ijsotl.2021.150107Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of ImpactLindsay WheelerA plethora of literature exists identifying the importance of engaging students in learning within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) undergraduate courses, making professional development (PD) for faculty teaching these courses vital. Yet few studies of PD programs focus on STEM faculty, incorporate direct measures of faculty practice, and seek to understand the student experience in courses taught by these faculty. In this study, I examine the impact of a program for faculty teaching large enrollment STEM courses on their perceptions, instructional practices, and student perceptions of learning. The program included a week-long course design institute (35 hrs) and a year-long STEM Faculty Learning Community (STEM-FLC) that met monthly (14 hrs). Data included faculty surveys, course syllabi, observations of teaching, and Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs). Results suggest the program helped instructors create more learning-focused courses and implement student-centered instructional practices to differing degrees. Despite the STEM-FLC, faculty still perceived barriers to implementing their course design. Students’ perceptions of course instruction and self-reported learning in these courses highlighted the importance of in-class activities. Finally, when the course design and instructional practice were aligned, students had more positive perceptions and reported higher learning gains compared to students in courses with misalignments in design and practice. Based on the findings of the study and connection with PD literature, I provide a set of essential PD features that may enable STEM faculty to make meaningful and lasting changes to practice.https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol15/iss1/7stemfaculty developmentinstructionprofessional development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lindsay Wheeler
spellingShingle Lindsay Wheeler
Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
stem
faculty development
instruction
professional development
author_facet Lindsay Wheeler
author_sort Lindsay Wheeler
title Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact
title_short Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact
title_full Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact
title_fullStr Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact
title_full_unstemmed Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact
title_sort supporting stem faculty of large enrollment undergraduate courses: a mixed methods study of impact
publisher Georgia Southern University
series International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
issn 1931-4744
publishDate 2021-05-01
description A plethora of literature exists identifying the importance of engaging students in learning within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) undergraduate courses, making professional development (PD) for faculty teaching these courses vital. Yet few studies of PD programs focus on STEM faculty, incorporate direct measures of faculty practice, and seek to understand the student experience in courses taught by these faculty. In this study, I examine the impact of a program for faculty teaching large enrollment STEM courses on their perceptions, instructional practices, and student perceptions of learning. The program included a week-long course design institute (35 hrs) and a year-long STEM Faculty Learning Community (STEM-FLC) that met monthly (14 hrs). Data included faculty surveys, course syllabi, observations of teaching, and Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs). Results suggest the program helped instructors create more learning-focused courses and implement student-centered instructional practices to differing degrees. Despite the STEM-FLC, faculty still perceived barriers to implementing their course design. Students’ perceptions of course instruction and self-reported learning in these courses highlighted the importance of in-class activities. Finally, when the course design and instructional practice were aligned, students had more positive perceptions and reported higher learning gains compared to students in courses with misalignments in design and practice. Based on the findings of the study and connection with PD literature, I provide a set of essential PD features that may enable STEM faculty to make meaningful and lasting changes to practice.
topic stem
faculty development
instruction
professional development
url https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol15/iss1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsaywheeler supportingstemfacultyoflargeenrollmentundergraduatecoursesamixedmethodsstudyofimpact
_version_ 1721397305315164160