Afterword: Robot Conceptualizations Between Continuity and Innovation
The aim of this afterword is to discuss a topic that links all the papers presented in this special issue. This transversal topic is the forms of social robots. Firstly, social robots form is discussed in light of the forms of robotics we have inherited from the past. This includes the models of soc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Franklin University Switzerland
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Intervalla : Platform for Intellectual Exchange |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.fus.edu/intervalla-files/10_fortunati.pdf |
id |
doaj-cb5f6dd3506042b6b9a2101e6e569a22 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cb5f6dd3506042b6b9a2101e6e569a222020-11-24T22:25:25ZengFranklin University Switzerland Intervalla : Platform for Intellectual Exchange2296-34132296-34132013-01-011116129Afterword: Robot Conceptualizations Between Continuity and InnovationLeopoldina Fortunati0University of UdineThe aim of this afterword is to discuss a topic that links all the papers presented in this special issue. This transversal topic is the forms of social robots. Firstly, social robots form is discussed in light of the forms of robotics we have inherited from the past. This includes the models of society that each of them embodied, as well as the social logic of the emotions connected to them. Secondly, social robots form is analyzed in light of the arrival in a new area for robotics, that of robots in the domestic sphere. Here, the system of filters created by the mass appropriation of information and communication technologies in the last two decades, has set the premise for a change of the social contract that has made social robot penetration possible. Whilst exploring the models and the meanings of social robots in the domestic sphere it emerges that robotics is following two different paths: one addressing the material part of housework (more traditional robotics) and the other addressing the immaterial part of reproduction work (more innovative robotics). Finally, the paper analyzes the dematerialization process of social robotics that is still taking place, a practice that is defined herein as “ubiquitous social roboting.”https://www.fus.edu/intervalla-files/10_fortunati.pdfsocial robotssocial robots formubiquitous social robotingsocial contract changerobotics and immaterial labor |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Leopoldina Fortunati |
spellingShingle |
Leopoldina Fortunati Afterword: Robot Conceptualizations Between Continuity and Innovation Intervalla : Platform for Intellectual Exchange social robots social robots form ubiquitous social roboting social contract change robotics and immaterial labor |
author_facet |
Leopoldina Fortunati |
author_sort |
Leopoldina Fortunati |
title |
Afterword: Robot Conceptualizations Between Continuity and Innovation |
title_short |
Afterword: Robot Conceptualizations Between Continuity and Innovation |
title_full |
Afterword: Robot Conceptualizations Between Continuity and Innovation |
title_fullStr |
Afterword: Robot Conceptualizations Between Continuity and Innovation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Afterword: Robot Conceptualizations Between Continuity and Innovation |
title_sort |
afterword: robot conceptualizations between continuity and innovation |
publisher |
Franklin University Switzerland |
series |
Intervalla : Platform for Intellectual Exchange |
issn |
2296-3413 2296-3413 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
The aim of this afterword is to discuss a topic that links all the papers presented in this special issue. This transversal topic is the forms of social robots. Firstly, social robots form is discussed in light of the forms of robotics we have inherited from the past. This includes the models of society that each of them embodied, as well as the social logic of the emotions connected to them. Secondly, social robots form is analyzed in light of the arrival in a new area for robotics, that of robots in the domestic sphere. Here, the system of filters created by the mass appropriation of information and communication technologies in the last two decades, has set the premise for a change of the social contract that has made social robot penetration possible. Whilst exploring the models and the meanings of social robots in the domestic sphere it emerges that robotics is following two different paths: one addressing the material part of housework (more traditional robotics) and the other addressing the immaterial part of reproduction work (more innovative robotics). Finally, the paper analyzes the dematerialization process of social robotics that is still taking place, a practice that is defined herein as “ubiquitous social roboting.” |
topic |
social robots social robots form ubiquitous social roboting social contract change robotics and immaterial labor |
url |
https://www.fus.edu/intervalla-files/10_fortunati.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leopoldinafortunati afterwordrobotconceptualizationsbetweencontinuityandinnovation |
_version_ |
1725757809120772096 |