Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes

Aims: The phenomenon of psychological insulin resistance (PIR) has been well documented for two decades, but interventions to treat PIR have not been well described. The aim of this study was to describe interventions used to treat psychological insulin resistance by certified diabetes educators (CD...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nancy A. Allen, Sofija E. Zagarins, Rebecca G. Feinberg, Garry Welch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462371630031X
id doaj-cb4eed435c4e4001bd6bc3ee7f26276c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb4eed435c4e4001bd6bc3ee7f26276c2020-11-24T22:15:13ZengElsevierJournal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology2214-62372017-03-017C1610.1016/j.jcte.2016.11.005Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetesNancy A. Allen0Sofija E. Zagarins1Rebecca G. Feinberg2Garry Welch3University of Utah College of Nursing, 10 East 2000 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United StatesSpringfield College, Department of Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, School of Health Sciences and Rehabilitation Studies, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109, United StatesBaystate Medical Center, Department of Geriatrics, Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA 01107, United StatesSilver Fern Healthcare, 11 Northmoor Road, West Hartford, CT 06117, United StatesAims: The phenomenon of psychological insulin resistance (PIR) has been well documented for two decades, but interventions to treat PIR have not been well described. The aim of this study was to describe interventions used to treat psychological insulin resistance by certified diabetes educators (CDE’s). Methods: A secondary data analysis study using empirical data from a trial (N = 234) that included four CDEs providing counseling for psychological insulin resistance. Participants not currently using insulin completed the 10-item Barriers to Insulin Therapy measure. The four CDE interventionists documented their approach to addressing participants’ barriers to taking insulin using a standard form. Recommendations were collated and summarized. Results: Strong PIR was shown by 28.4% of participants reporting that they “would not start insulin” and a moderate degree of PIR was shown by 61.2% who said they “would be upset, but would start insulin.” The CDE’s treated PIR with four primary interventions: 1) teaching and providing explanations, 2) demonstrations and sharing examples of success using insulin therapy, 3) return demonstrations, and 4) addressing feelings and positively managing expectations. Conclusion: This is the first study to describe in some detail potentially effective patient management strategies for PIR. A randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of PIR interventions is needed.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462371630031X
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nancy A. Allen
Sofija E. Zagarins
Rebecca G. Feinberg
Garry Welch
spellingShingle Nancy A. Allen
Sofija E. Zagarins
Rebecca G. Feinberg
Garry Welch
Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes
Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology
author_facet Nancy A. Allen
Sofija E. Zagarins
Rebecca G. Feinberg
Garry Welch
author_sort Nancy A. Allen
title Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes
title_short Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes
title_full Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes
title_fullStr Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes
title_sort treating psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology
issn 2214-6237
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Aims: The phenomenon of psychological insulin resistance (PIR) has been well documented for two decades, but interventions to treat PIR have not been well described. The aim of this study was to describe interventions used to treat psychological insulin resistance by certified diabetes educators (CDE’s). Methods: A secondary data analysis study using empirical data from a trial (N = 234) that included four CDEs providing counseling for psychological insulin resistance. Participants not currently using insulin completed the 10-item Barriers to Insulin Therapy measure. The four CDE interventionists documented their approach to addressing participants’ barriers to taking insulin using a standard form. Recommendations were collated and summarized. Results: Strong PIR was shown by 28.4% of participants reporting that they “would not start insulin” and a moderate degree of PIR was shown by 61.2% who said they “would be upset, but would start insulin.” The CDE’s treated PIR with four primary interventions: 1) teaching and providing explanations, 2) demonstrations and sharing examples of success using insulin therapy, 3) return demonstrations, and 4) addressing feelings and positively managing expectations. Conclusion: This is the first study to describe in some detail potentially effective patient management strategies for PIR. A randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of PIR interventions is needed.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462371630031X
work_keys_str_mv AT nancyaallen treatingpsychologicalinsulinresistanceintype2diabetes
AT sofijaezagarins treatingpsychologicalinsulinresistanceintype2diabetes
AT rebeccagfeinberg treatingpsychologicalinsulinresistanceintype2diabetes
AT garrywelch treatingpsychologicalinsulinresistanceintype2diabetes
_version_ 1725795496550727680