Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert
This article analyses, first of all, the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert, the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of realit...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
2010-07-01
|
Series: | Кантовский сборник |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/7d4/%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0.pdf |
id |
doaj-cb3c0a203e75413db1fe2baa5cde043e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cb3c0a203e75413db1fe2baa5cde043e2020-11-25T01:14:13ZdeuImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityКантовский сборник0207-69182310-37012010-07-01292697910.5922/0207-6918-2010-2-6Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert Kubalica T. This article analyses, first of all, the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert, the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflection, but does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden School, Emil Lask, who rejected the theory of reflection in favour of the aftervision theory (Nachbildtheorie). https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/7d4/%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0.pdffirst of allthe epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickertthe main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflectionbut does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden SchoolEmil LaskNeo-Kantianismtheory of reflectionimmanent theory of reflectionHeinrich Rickert |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kubalica T. |
spellingShingle |
Kubalica T. Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert Кантовский сборник first of all the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflection but does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden School Emil Lask Neo-Kantianism theory of reflection immanent theory of reflection Heinrich Rickert |
author_facet |
Kubalica T. |
author_sort |
Kubalica T. |
title |
Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert |
title_short |
Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert |
title_full |
Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert |
title_fullStr |
Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert |
title_full_unstemmed |
Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert |
title_sort |
die relative wahrheit der abbildtheorie in der interpretation von h. rickert |
publisher |
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University |
series |
Кантовский сборник |
issn |
0207-6918 2310-3701 |
publishDate |
2010-07-01 |
description |
This article analyses, first of all, the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert, the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflection, but does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden School, Emil Lask, who rejected the theory of reflection in favour of the aftervision theory (Nachbildtheorie).
|
topic |
first of all the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflection but does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden School Emil Lask Neo-Kantianism theory of reflection immanent theory of reflection Heinrich Rickert |
url |
https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/7d4/%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kubalicat dierelativewahrheitderabbildtheorieinderinterpretationvonhrickert |
_version_ |
1725158102856105984 |