id doaj-cb3c0a203e75413db1fe2baa5cde043e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb3c0a203e75413db1fe2baa5cde043e2020-11-25T01:14:13ZdeuImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityКантовский сборник0207-69182310-37012010-07-01292697910.5922/0207-6918-2010-2-6Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert Kubalica T. This article analyses, first of all, the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert, the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflection, but does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden School, Emil Lask, who rejected the theory of reflection in favour of the aftervision theory (Nachbildtheorie). https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/7d4/%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0.pdffirst of allthe epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickertthe main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflectionbut does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden SchoolEmil LaskNeo-Kantianismtheory of reflectionimmanent theory of reflectionHeinrich Rickert
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kubalica T.
spellingShingle Kubalica T.
Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert
Кантовский сборник
first of all
the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert
the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflection
but does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden School
Emil Lask
Neo-Kantianism
theory of reflection
immanent theory of reflection
Heinrich Rickert
author_facet Kubalica T.
author_sort Kubalica T.
title Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert
title_short Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert
title_full Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert
title_fullStr Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert
title_full_unstemmed Die relative Wahrheit der Abbildtheorie in der Interpretation von H. Rickert
title_sort die relative wahrheit der abbildtheorie in der interpretation von h. rickert
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
series Кантовский сборник
issn 0207-6918
2310-3701
publishDate 2010-07-01
description This article analyses, first of all, the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert, the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflection, but does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden School, Emil Lask, who rejected the theory of reflection in favour of the aftervision theory (Nachbildtheorie).
topic first of all
the epistemological theory of reflection (Abbildtheorie) of Heinrich Rickert
the main representative of the Baden Neo-Kantianism School. The author analyses the key arguments put forward by Rickert against the understanding of cognition as a reflection of reality. Rickert’s standpoint is neutral. He criticises the transcendental theory of reflection
but does not reject the idea of reflection as a model of cognition and acknowledges the immanent theory of reflection as relatively justified. The article also addresses the standpoint of another representative of the Baden School
Emil Lask
Neo-Kantianism
theory of reflection
immanent theory of reflection
Heinrich Rickert
url https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/7d4/%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kubalicat dierelativewahrheitderabbildtheorieinderinterpretationvonhrickert
_version_ 1725158102856105984