Color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: An experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study

Background and aim: Natural tooth shade selection has been a critical step. Over the last decade, computer aided shade matching instruments appeared in market to facilitate shade matching but they presented some disadvantages as increased expenses. Recently, mobile Apps that can analyze color of an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Israa Nafea, Ahmed Alharbi, Abrar Abduh, Abdulaziz Alharbi, Rania M. Moussa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-01-01
Series:Saudi Dental Journal
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101390521930152X
id doaj-cb3676ff19b242a3bb3a9190f55d85ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb3676ff19b242a3bb3a9190f55d85ee2020-11-24T23:52:10ZengElsevierSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522019-01-0131S13Color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: An experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind studyIsraa Nafea0Ahmed Alharbi1Abrar Abduh2Abdulaziz Alharbi3Rania M. Moussa4Dental Interns, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Taibah, Egypt; Corresponding author.Dental Interns, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Taibah, EgyptDental Interns, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Taibah, EgyptDental Interns, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Taibah, EgyptSubstitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Taibah, EgyptBackground and aim: Natural tooth shade selection has been a critical step. Over the last decade, computer aided shade matching instruments appeared in market to facilitate shade matching but they presented some disadvantages as increased expenses. Recently, mobile Apps that can analyze color of an image are available. Material and methods: This study is an experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study. Two mobile Apps were selected to test their ability to match shades of anonymous VITA Classical shade guide tabs as compared to a second set of tabs of the same type. The sample size was convenience n = 16. One of the two shade guides was tested by the two mobile Apps (test tabs). The second shade guide was used as a reference for matching (control tabs). Color readings of the two Apps were recorded in terms of RGB and average values of two examiners were recorded and compared. All tabs in the control shade guide were surveyed searching for the correct matching and percentages of correct matchings were calculated. Reliability of mobile applications was tested after 7 days under similar conditions. Results: A significant difference was found between the two applications in all color ranges (P ≤ 0.05) compared using unpaired t-test. The percentages of correctly matched test tabs with their corresponding control tabs, were 30 and 25%. A significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) was found in RGB values of both applications when comparing repeated RGB readings using paired T-test. Recommendations and conclusion: Mobile applications used differed significantly in reading all color ranges, especially B values. The degree of accuracy was relatively low. A significant difference was reported between multiple readings of the two Apps. Future studies need to focus on producing more specialized dental Apps for shade selection. Keywords shade matching, computer-aided, shade selection, mobile Apps, RGB.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101390521930152X
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Israa Nafea
Ahmed Alharbi
Abrar Abduh
Abdulaziz Alharbi
Rania M. Moussa
spellingShingle Israa Nafea
Ahmed Alharbi
Abrar Abduh
Abdulaziz Alharbi
Rania M. Moussa
Color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: An experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study
Saudi Dental Journal
author_facet Israa Nafea
Ahmed Alharbi
Abrar Abduh
Abdulaziz Alharbi
Rania M. Moussa
author_sort Israa Nafea
title Color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: An experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study
title_short Color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: An experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study
title_full Color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: An experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study
title_fullStr Color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: An experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study
title_full_unstemmed Color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: An experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study
title_sort color shade matching by mobile applications in dental practice: an experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study
publisher Elsevier
series Saudi Dental Journal
issn 1013-9052
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background and aim: Natural tooth shade selection has been a critical step. Over the last decade, computer aided shade matching instruments appeared in market to facilitate shade matching but they presented some disadvantages as increased expenses. Recently, mobile Apps that can analyze color of an image are available. Material and methods: This study is an experimental comparative in-vitro double-blind study. Two mobile Apps were selected to test their ability to match shades of anonymous VITA Classical shade guide tabs as compared to a second set of tabs of the same type. The sample size was convenience n = 16. One of the two shade guides was tested by the two mobile Apps (test tabs). The second shade guide was used as a reference for matching (control tabs). Color readings of the two Apps were recorded in terms of RGB and average values of two examiners were recorded and compared. All tabs in the control shade guide were surveyed searching for the correct matching and percentages of correct matchings were calculated. Reliability of mobile applications was tested after 7 days under similar conditions. Results: A significant difference was found between the two applications in all color ranges (P ≤ 0.05) compared using unpaired t-test. The percentages of correctly matched test tabs with their corresponding control tabs, were 30 and 25%. A significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) was found in RGB values of both applications when comparing repeated RGB readings using paired T-test. Recommendations and conclusion: Mobile applications used differed significantly in reading all color ranges, especially B values. The degree of accuracy was relatively low. A significant difference was reported between multiple readings of the two Apps. Future studies need to focus on producing more specialized dental Apps for shade selection. Keywords shade matching, computer-aided, shade selection, mobile Apps, RGB.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101390521930152X
work_keys_str_mv AT israanafea colorshadematchingbymobileapplicationsindentalpracticeanexperimentalcomparativeinvitrodoubleblindstudy
AT ahmedalharbi colorshadematchingbymobileapplicationsindentalpracticeanexperimentalcomparativeinvitrodoubleblindstudy
AT abrarabduh colorshadematchingbymobileapplicationsindentalpracticeanexperimentalcomparativeinvitrodoubleblindstudy
AT abdulazizalharbi colorshadematchingbymobileapplicationsindentalpracticeanexperimentalcomparativeinvitrodoubleblindstudy
AT raniammoussa colorshadematchingbymobileapplicationsindentalpracticeanexperimentalcomparativeinvitrodoubleblindstudy
_version_ 1725474409563553792