Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.
Spatial memory is thought to be organized along experienced views and allocentric reference axes. Memory access from different perspectives typically yields V-patterns for egocentric encoding (monotonic decline in performance along with the angular deviation from the experienced perspectives) and W-...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3760797?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-cb344ac3ad834b73ba32ee79adff1c81 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cb344ac3ad834b73ba32ee79adff1c812020-11-24T21:43:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7417710.1371/journal.pone.0074177Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.Tobias MeilingerHeinrich H BülthoffSpatial memory is thought to be organized along experienced views and allocentric reference axes. Memory access from different perspectives typically yields V-patterns for egocentric encoding (monotonic decline in performance along with the angular deviation from the experienced perspectives) and W-patterns for axes encoding (better performance along parallel and orthogonal perspectives than along oblique perspectives). We showed that learning an object array with a verbal secondary task reduced W-patterns compared with learning without verbal shadowing. This suggests that axes encoding happened in a verbal format; for example, by rows and columns. Alternatively, general cognitive load from the secondary task prevented memorizing relative to a spatial axis. Independent of encoding, pointing with a surrounding room visible yielded stronger W-patterns compared with pointing with no room visible. This suggests that the visible room geometry interfered with the memorized room geometry. With verbal shadowing and without visual interference only V-patterns remained; otherwise, V- and W-patterns were combined. Verbal encoding and visual interference explain when W-patterns can be expected alongside V-patterns and thus can help in resolving different performance patterns in a wide range of experiments.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3760797?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tobias Meilinger Heinrich H Bülthoff |
spellingShingle |
Tobias Meilinger Heinrich H Bülthoff Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Tobias Meilinger Heinrich H Bülthoff |
author_sort |
Tobias Meilinger |
title |
Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory. |
title_short |
Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory. |
title_full |
Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory. |
title_fullStr |
Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory. |
title_sort |
verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Spatial memory is thought to be organized along experienced views and allocentric reference axes. Memory access from different perspectives typically yields V-patterns for egocentric encoding (monotonic decline in performance along with the angular deviation from the experienced perspectives) and W-patterns for axes encoding (better performance along parallel and orthogonal perspectives than along oblique perspectives). We showed that learning an object array with a verbal secondary task reduced W-patterns compared with learning without verbal shadowing. This suggests that axes encoding happened in a verbal format; for example, by rows and columns. Alternatively, general cognitive load from the secondary task prevented memorizing relative to a spatial axis. Independent of encoding, pointing with a surrounding room visible yielded stronger W-patterns compared with pointing with no room visible. This suggests that the visible room geometry interfered with the memorized room geometry. With verbal shadowing and without visual interference only V-patterns remained; otherwise, V- and W-patterns were combined. Verbal encoding and visual interference explain when W-patterns can be expected alongside V-patterns and thus can help in resolving different performance patterns in a wide range of experiments. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3760797?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tobiasmeilinger verbalshadowingandvisualinterferenceinspatialmemory AT heinrichhbulthoff verbalshadowingandvisualinterferenceinspatialmemory |
_version_ |
1725911874151645184 |