Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.

Spatial memory is thought to be organized along experienced views and allocentric reference axes. Memory access from different perspectives typically yields V-patterns for egocentric encoding (monotonic decline in performance along with the angular deviation from the experienced perspectives) and W-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tobias Meilinger, Heinrich H Bülthoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3760797?pdf=render
id doaj-cb344ac3ad834b73ba32ee79adff1c81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb344ac3ad834b73ba32ee79adff1c812020-11-24T21:43:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7417710.1371/journal.pone.0074177Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.Tobias MeilingerHeinrich H BülthoffSpatial memory is thought to be organized along experienced views and allocentric reference axes. Memory access from different perspectives typically yields V-patterns for egocentric encoding (monotonic decline in performance along with the angular deviation from the experienced perspectives) and W-patterns for axes encoding (better performance along parallel and orthogonal perspectives than along oblique perspectives). We showed that learning an object array with a verbal secondary task reduced W-patterns compared with learning without verbal shadowing. This suggests that axes encoding happened in a verbal format; for example, by rows and columns. Alternatively, general cognitive load from the secondary task prevented memorizing relative to a spatial axis. Independent of encoding, pointing with a surrounding room visible yielded stronger W-patterns compared with pointing with no room visible. This suggests that the visible room geometry interfered with the memorized room geometry. With verbal shadowing and without visual interference only V-patterns remained; otherwise, V- and W-patterns were combined. Verbal encoding and visual interference explain when W-patterns can be expected alongside V-patterns and thus can help in resolving different performance patterns in a wide range of experiments.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3760797?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tobias Meilinger
Heinrich H Bülthoff
spellingShingle Tobias Meilinger
Heinrich H Bülthoff
Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Tobias Meilinger
Heinrich H Bülthoff
author_sort Tobias Meilinger
title Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.
title_short Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.
title_full Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.
title_fullStr Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.
title_full_unstemmed Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.
title_sort verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Spatial memory is thought to be organized along experienced views and allocentric reference axes. Memory access from different perspectives typically yields V-patterns for egocentric encoding (monotonic decline in performance along with the angular deviation from the experienced perspectives) and W-patterns for axes encoding (better performance along parallel and orthogonal perspectives than along oblique perspectives). We showed that learning an object array with a verbal secondary task reduced W-patterns compared with learning without verbal shadowing. This suggests that axes encoding happened in a verbal format; for example, by rows and columns. Alternatively, general cognitive load from the secondary task prevented memorizing relative to a spatial axis. Independent of encoding, pointing with a surrounding room visible yielded stronger W-patterns compared with pointing with no room visible. This suggests that the visible room geometry interfered with the memorized room geometry. With verbal shadowing and without visual interference only V-patterns remained; otherwise, V- and W-patterns were combined. Verbal encoding and visual interference explain when W-patterns can be expected alongside V-patterns and thus can help in resolving different performance patterns in a wide range of experiments.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3760797?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasmeilinger verbalshadowingandvisualinterferenceinspatialmemory
AT heinrichhbulthoff verbalshadowingandvisualinterferenceinspatialmemory
_version_ 1725911874151645184