Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML

Structural equation models (SEMs) can be estimated using a variety of methods. For complete normally distributed data, two asymptotically efficient estimation methods exist: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized least squares (GLS). With incomplete normally distributed data, an extension of ML cal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victoria Savalei, Mijke Rhemtulla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767/full
id doaj-cb2cef4070554ca1b467cda552cadde8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb2cef4070554ca1b467cda552cadde82020-11-24T22:46:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-05-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767268356Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage MLVictoria Savalei0Mijke Rhemtulla1Department of Psychology, University of British ColumbiaVancouver, BC, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, DavisDavis, CA, USAStructural equation models (SEMs) can be estimated using a variety of methods. For complete normally distributed data, two asymptotically efficient estimation methods exist: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized least squares (GLS). With incomplete normally distributed data, an extension of ML called “full information” ML (FIML), is often the estimation method of choice. An extension of GLS to incomplete normally distributed data has never been developed or studied. In this article we define the “full information” GLS estimator for incomplete normally distributed data (FIGLS). We also identify and study an important application of the new GLS approach. In many modeling contexts, the variables in the SEM are linear composites (e.g., sums or averages) of the raw items. For instance, SEMs often use parcels (sums of raw items) as indicators of latent factors. If data are missing at the item level, but the model is at the composite level, FIML is not possible. In this situation, FIGLS may be the only asymptotically efficient estimator available. Results of a simulation study comparing the new FIGLS estimator to the best available analytic alternative, two-stage ML, with item-level missing data are presented.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767/fullmissing datastructural equation modelingitem-level missing dataparcelsgeneralized least squares estimation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Victoria Savalei
Mijke Rhemtulla
spellingShingle Victoria Savalei
Mijke Rhemtulla
Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML
Frontiers in Psychology
missing data
structural equation modeling
item-level missing data
parcels
generalized least squares estimation
author_facet Victoria Savalei
Mijke Rhemtulla
author_sort Victoria Savalei
title Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML
title_short Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML
title_full Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML
title_fullStr Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML
title_full_unstemmed Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML
title_sort normal theory gls estimator for missing data: an application to item-level missing data and a comparison to two-stage ml
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Structural equation models (SEMs) can be estimated using a variety of methods. For complete normally distributed data, two asymptotically efficient estimation methods exist: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized least squares (GLS). With incomplete normally distributed data, an extension of ML called “full information” ML (FIML), is often the estimation method of choice. An extension of GLS to incomplete normally distributed data has never been developed or studied. In this article we define the “full information” GLS estimator for incomplete normally distributed data (FIGLS). We also identify and study an important application of the new GLS approach. In many modeling contexts, the variables in the SEM are linear composites (e.g., sums or averages) of the raw items. For instance, SEMs often use parcels (sums of raw items) as indicators of latent factors. If data are missing at the item level, but the model is at the composite level, FIML is not possible. In this situation, FIGLS may be the only asymptotically efficient estimator available. Results of a simulation study comparing the new FIGLS estimator to the best available analytic alternative, two-stage ML, with item-level missing data are presented.
topic missing data
structural equation modeling
item-level missing data
parcels
generalized least squares estimation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767/full
work_keys_str_mv AT victoriasavalei normaltheoryglsestimatorformissingdataanapplicationtoitemlevelmissingdataandacomparisontotwostageml
AT mijkerhemtulla normaltheoryglsestimatorformissingdataanapplicationtoitemlevelmissingdataandacomparisontotwostageml
_version_ 1725683261677502464