Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML
Structural equation models (SEMs) can be estimated using a variety of methods. For complete normally distributed data, two asymptotically efficient estimation methods exist: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized least squares (GLS). With incomplete normally distributed data, an extension of ML cal...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767/full |
id |
doaj-cb2cef4070554ca1b467cda552cadde8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cb2cef4070554ca1b467cda552cadde82020-11-24T22:46:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-05-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767268356Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage MLVictoria Savalei0Mijke Rhemtulla1Department of Psychology, University of British ColumbiaVancouver, BC, CanadaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, DavisDavis, CA, USAStructural equation models (SEMs) can be estimated using a variety of methods. For complete normally distributed data, two asymptotically efficient estimation methods exist: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized least squares (GLS). With incomplete normally distributed data, an extension of ML called “full information” ML (FIML), is often the estimation method of choice. An extension of GLS to incomplete normally distributed data has never been developed or studied. In this article we define the “full information” GLS estimator for incomplete normally distributed data (FIGLS). We also identify and study an important application of the new GLS approach. In many modeling contexts, the variables in the SEM are linear composites (e.g., sums or averages) of the raw items. For instance, SEMs often use parcels (sums of raw items) as indicators of latent factors. If data are missing at the item level, but the model is at the composite level, FIML is not possible. In this situation, FIGLS may be the only asymptotically efficient estimator available. Results of a simulation study comparing the new FIGLS estimator to the best available analytic alternative, two-stage ML, with item-level missing data are presented.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767/fullmissing datastructural equation modelingitem-level missing dataparcelsgeneralized least squares estimation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Victoria Savalei Mijke Rhemtulla |
spellingShingle |
Victoria Savalei Mijke Rhemtulla Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML Frontiers in Psychology missing data structural equation modeling item-level missing data parcels generalized least squares estimation |
author_facet |
Victoria Savalei Mijke Rhemtulla |
author_sort |
Victoria Savalei |
title |
Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML |
title_short |
Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML |
title_full |
Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML |
title_fullStr |
Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML |
title_full_unstemmed |
Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML |
title_sort |
normal theory gls estimator for missing data: an application to item-level missing data and a comparison to two-stage ml |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2017-05-01 |
description |
Structural equation models (SEMs) can be estimated using a variety of methods. For complete normally distributed data, two asymptotically efficient estimation methods exist: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized least squares (GLS). With incomplete normally distributed data, an extension of ML called “full information” ML (FIML), is often the estimation method of choice. An extension of GLS to incomplete normally distributed data has never been developed or studied. In this article we define the “full information” GLS estimator for incomplete normally distributed data (FIGLS). We also identify and study an important application of the new GLS approach. In many modeling contexts, the variables in the SEM are linear composites (e.g., sums or averages) of the raw items. For instance, SEMs often use parcels (sums of raw items) as indicators of latent factors. If data are missing at the item level, but the model is at the composite level, FIML is not possible. In this situation, FIGLS may be the only asymptotically efficient estimator available. Results of a simulation study comparing the new FIGLS estimator to the best available analytic alternative, two-stage ML, with item-level missing data are presented. |
topic |
missing data structural equation modeling item-level missing data parcels generalized least squares estimation |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00767/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT victoriasavalei normaltheoryglsestimatorformissingdataanapplicationtoitemlevelmissingdataandacomparisontotwostageml AT mijkerhemtulla normaltheoryglsestimatorformissingdataanapplicationtoitemlevelmissingdataandacomparisontotwostageml |
_version_ |
1725683261677502464 |