EVALUATING CONTINUOUS-TIME SLAM USING A PREDEFINED TRAJECTORY PROVIDED BY A ROBOTIC ARM
Recently published approaches to SLAM algorithms process laser sensor measurements and output a map as a point cloud of the environment. Often the actual precision of the map remains unclear, since SLAMalgorithms apply local improvements to the resulting map. Unfortunately, it is not trivial to co...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-09-01
|
Series: | ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
Online Access: | https://www.isprs-ann-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/IV-2-W4/91/2017/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-91-2017.pdf |
Summary: | Recently published approaches to SLAM algorithms process laser sensor measurements and output a map as a point cloud of the
environment. Often the actual precision of the map remains unclear, since SLAMalgorithms apply local improvements to the resulting
map. Unfortunately, it is not trivial to compare the performance of SLAMalgorithms objectively, especially without an accurate ground
truth. This paper presents a novel benchmarking technique that allows to compare a precise map generated with an accurate ground
truth trajectory to a map with a manipulated trajectory which was distorted by different forms of noise. The accurate ground truth is
acquired by mounting a laser scanner on an industrial robotic arm. The robotic arm is moved on a predefined path while the position and
orientation of the end-effector tool are monitored. During this process the 2D profile measurements of the laser scanner are recorded
in six degrees of freedom and afterwards used to generate a precise point cloud of the test environment. For benchmarking, an offline
continuous-time SLAM algorithm is subsequently applied to remove the inserted distortions. Finally, it is shown that the manipulated
point cloud is reversible to its previous state and is slightly improved compared to the original version, since small errors that came into
account by imprecise assumptions, sensor noise and calibration errors are removed as well. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2194-9042 2194-9050 |