Short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.

Prey animals often have to trade off foraging against vigilance. However, vigilance is costly and individuals are expected to adjust their vigilance and its cost in relation to social cues and their predation risk. To test this, we conducted playback experiments in the field to study how lions'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: François-René Favreau, Olivier Pays, Anne W Goldizen, Hervé Fritz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3869902?pdf=render
id doaj-cb2279ef56544913859ef797b5d47184
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb2279ef56544913859ef797b5d471842020-11-25T01:42:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8497010.1371/journal.pone.0084970Short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.François-René FavreauOlivier PaysAnne W GoldizenHervé FritzPrey animals often have to trade off foraging against vigilance. However, vigilance is costly and individuals are expected to adjust their vigilance and its cost in relation to social cues and their predation risk. To test this, we conducted playback experiments in the field to study how lions' (Panthera leo) roars and male impalas' (Aepyceros melampus) territorial vocalizations affected the vigilance and foraging behaviours as well as movements of female impalas. Our results show that impalas adjusted their activities in different ways depending on the vocalizations broadcast. After lions' roars were played, female impalas increased their vigilance activity (in particular increasing their high-cost vigilance--vigilance without chewing), decreased their bite rates and increased their movements, whereas male impalas' vocalizations caused females to decrease their vigilance (decreasing their low-cost vigilance--vigilance while chewing) and increase their movements without affecting their bite rates. Therefore, it appears that predators' vocalizations stimulate anti-predator behaviours such as vigilance and movement at the expense of foraging, whereas males' vocalizations increase individuals' displacements at the expense of vigilance. Overall, this study shows that both predator and social cues have direct effects on the behaviour of gregarious prey and need to be considered in future studies.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3869902?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author François-René Favreau
Olivier Pays
Anne W Goldizen
Hervé Fritz
spellingShingle François-René Favreau
Olivier Pays
Anne W Goldizen
Hervé Fritz
Short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.
PLoS ONE
author_facet François-René Favreau
Olivier Pays
Anne W Goldizen
Hervé Fritz
author_sort François-René Favreau
title Short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.
title_short Short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.
title_full Short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.
title_fullStr Short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.
title_full_unstemmed Short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.
title_sort short-term behavioural responses of impalas in simulated antipredator and social contexts.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Prey animals often have to trade off foraging against vigilance. However, vigilance is costly and individuals are expected to adjust their vigilance and its cost in relation to social cues and their predation risk. To test this, we conducted playback experiments in the field to study how lions' (Panthera leo) roars and male impalas' (Aepyceros melampus) territorial vocalizations affected the vigilance and foraging behaviours as well as movements of female impalas. Our results show that impalas adjusted their activities in different ways depending on the vocalizations broadcast. After lions' roars were played, female impalas increased their vigilance activity (in particular increasing their high-cost vigilance--vigilance without chewing), decreased their bite rates and increased their movements, whereas male impalas' vocalizations caused females to decrease their vigilance (decreasing their low-cost vigilance--vigilance while chewing) and increase their movements without affecting their bite rates. Therefore, it appears that predators' vocalizations stimulate anti-predator behaviours such as vigilance and movement at the expense of foraging, whereas males' vocalizations increase individuals' displacements at the expense of vigilance. Overall, this study shows that both predator and social cues have direct effects on the behaviour of gregarious prey and need to be considered in future studies.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3869902?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT francoisrenefavreau shorttermbehaviouralresponsesofimpalasinsimulatedantipredatorandsocialcontexts
AT olivierpays shorttermbehaviouralresponsesofimpalasinsimulatedantipredatorandsocialcontexts
AT annewgoldizen shorttermbehaviouralresponsesofimpalasinsimulatedantipredatorandsocialcontexts
AT hervefritz shorttermbehaviouralresponsesofimpalasinsimulatedantipredatorandsocialcontexts
_version_ 1725038188985057280