Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement

Introduction: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) use only hand instruments for caries removal therefore bacteria may remain and survive underneath these restorations. This problem can be solved if the restorative material also possesses antibacterial activity. Aim: To evaluate antibacterial eff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari, ND Shashikiran, Savita Hadkar, Sachin Gugawad, Namrata Gaonkar, Swapnil Taur, Ankita Maurya, Shreya Bapat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2020-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13609/43918_F(SL)_CE[Ra1]_(SL)_PF1(AJ_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf
id doaj-cb20f20f4b044ce9b34a508074a1b2be
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb20f20f4b044ce9b34a508074a1b2be2020-11-25T02:13:30ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2020-03-01143ZC29ZC3210.7860/JCDR/2020/43918.13609Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer CementPradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari0ND Shashikiran1Savita Hadkar2Sachin Gugawad3Namrata Gaonkar4Swapnil Taur5Ankita Maurya6Shreya Bapat7Postgraduate Student, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Professor and Head, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Postgraduate Student, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Postgraduate Student, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Introduction: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) use only hand instruments for caries removal therefore bacteria may remain and survive underneath these restorations. This problem can be solved if the restorative material also possesses antibacterial activity. Aim: To evaluate antibacterial efficacy and microhardness of different combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder (TAP) mixed in Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study from December 2019 to February 2019 evaluated the antibacterial effect and microhardness of conventional GIC containing antibiotics in different combinations. Group I (only GIC), Group II (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole+Minocycline), Group III (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole+Cefaclor), Group IV (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole) were added to powdered GIC (FUJI IX) to obtain 1.5% w/w ratio. The antibacterial activity of set GIC discs was evaluated against Streptococcus mutans using agar-diffusion methods and microhardness was evaluated using vicker’s microhardness test. ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey multiple-range test was used to determine significant differences. Results: The results showed that antibacterial efficacy of Group III (GIC+TAP having Cefaclor) was increased and statistically significant (p<0.001) while the results of microhardness test of the same group were also higher. Conclusion: Current study shows, greater antibacterial and microhardness results with TAP containing cefaclor mixed in GIC.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13609/43918_F(SL)_CE[Ra1]_(SL)_PF1(AJ_SHU)_PN(SL).pdfatraumatic restorationsphysical strengthstreptococcus mutans
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari
ND Shashikiran
Savita Hadkar
Sachin Gugawad
Namrata Gaonkar
Swapnil Taur
Ankita Maurya
Shreya Bapat
spellingShingle Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari
ND Shashikiran
Savita Hadkar
Sachin Gugawad
Namrata Gaonkar
Swapnil Taur
Ankita Maurya
Shreya Bapat
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
atraumatic restorations
physical strength
streptococcus mutans
author_facet Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari
ND Shashikiran
Savita Hadkar
Sachin Gugawad
Namrata Gaonkar
Swapnil Taur
Ankita Maurya
Shreya Bapat
author_sort Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari
title Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement
title_sort comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy and microhardness after adding different combinations of triple antibiotic powder in conventional restorative glass ionomer cement
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Introduction: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) use only hand instruments for caries removal therefore bacteria may remain and survive underneath these restorations. This problem can be solved if the restorative material also possesses antibacterial activity. Aim: To evaluate antibacterial efficacy and microhardness of different combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder (TAP) mixed in Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study from December 2019 to February 2019 evaluated the antibacterial effect and microhardness of conventional GIC containing antibiotics in different combinations. Group I (only GIC), Group II (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole+Minocycline), Group III (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole+Cefaclor), Group IV (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole) were added to powdered GIC (FUJI IX) to obtain 1.5% w/w ratio. The antibacterial activity of set GIC discs was evaluated against Streptococcus mutans using agar-diffusion methods and microhardness was evaluated using vicker’s microhardness test. ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey multiple-range test was used to determine significant differences. Results: The results showed that antibacterial efficacy of Group III (GIC+TAP having Cefaclor) was increased and statistically significant (p<0.001) while the results of microhardness test of the same group were also higher. Conclusion: Current study shows, greater antibacterial and microhardness results with TAP containing cefaclor mixed in GIC.
topic atraumatic restorations
physical strength
streptococcus mutans
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13609/43918_F(SL)_CE[Ra1]_(SL)_PF1(AJ_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pradnyaramkrishnachaudhari comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement
AT ndshashikiran comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement
AT savitahadkar comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement
AT sachingugawad comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement
AT namratagaonkar comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement
AT swapniltaur comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement
AT ankitamaurya comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement
AT shreyabapat comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement
_version_ 1724904804312940544