Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement
Introduction: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) use only hand instruments for caries removal therefore bacteria may remain and survive underneath these restorations. This problem can be solved if the restorative material also possesses antibacterial activity. Aim: To evaluate antibacterial eff...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13609/43918_F(SL)_CE[Ra1]_(SL)_PF1(AJ_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf |
id |
doaj-cb20f20f4b044ce9b34a508074a1b2be |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cb20f20f4b044ce9b34a508074a1b2be2020-11-25T02:13:30ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2020-03-01143ZC29ZC3210.7860/JCDR/2020/43918.13609Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer CementPradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari0ND Shashikiran1Savita Hadkar2Sachin Gugawad3Namrata Gaonkar4Swapnil Taur5Ankita Maurya6Shreya Bapat7Postgraduate Student, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Professor and Head, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Postgraduate Student, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Postgraduate Student, Department of Preventive and Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India.Introduction: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) use only hand instruments for caries removal therefore bacteria may remain and survive underneath these restorations. This problem can be solved if the restorative material also possesses antibacterial activity. Aim: To evaluate antibacterial efficacy and microhardness of different combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder (TAP) mixed in Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study from December 2019 to February 2019 evaluated the antibacterial effect and microhardness of conventional GIC containing antibiotics in different combinations. Group I (only GIC), Group II (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole+Minocycline), Group III (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole+Cefaclor), Group IV (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole) were added to powdered GIC (FUJI IX) to obtain 1.5% w/w ratio. The antibacterial activity of set GIC discs was evaluated against Streptococcus mutans using agar-diffusion methods and microhardness was evaluated using vicker’s microhardness test. ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey multiple-range test was used to determine significant differences. Results: The results showed that antibacterial efficacy of Group III (GIC+TAP having Cefaclor) was increased and statistically significant (p<0.001) while the results of microhardness test of the same group were also higher. Conclusion: Current study shows, greater antibacterial and microhardness results with TAP containing cefaclor mixed in GIC.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13609/43918_F(SL)_CE[Ra1]_(SL)_PF1(AJ_SHU)_PN(SL).pdfatraumatic restorationsphysical strengthstreptococcus mutans |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari ND Shashikiran Savita Hadkar Sachin Gugawad Namrata Gaonkar Swapnil Taur Ankita Maurya Shreya Bapat |
spellingShingle |
Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari ND Shashikiran Savita Hadkar Sachin Gugawad Namrata Gaonkar Swapnil Taur Ankita Maurya Shreya Bapat Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research atraumatic restorations physical strength streptococcus mutans |
author_facet |
Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari ND Shashikiran Savita Hadkar Sachin Gugawad Namrata Gaonkar Swapnil Taur Ankita Maurya Shreya Bapat |
author_sort |
Pradnya Ramkrishna Chaudhari |
title |
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_short |
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_full |
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy and Microhardness after Adding Different Combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder in Conventional Restorative Glass Ionomer Cement |
title_sort |
comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy and microhardness after adding different combinations of triple antibiotic powder in conventional restorative glass ionomer cement |
publisher |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
series |
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
issn |
2249-782X 0973-709X |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Introduction: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) use only hand instruments for caries removal therefore bacteria may remain and survive underneath these restorations. This problem can be solved if the restorative material also possesses antibacterial activity.
Aim: To evaluate antibacterial efficacy and microhardness of different combinations of Triple Antibiotic Powder (TAP) mixed in Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC).
Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study from December 2019 to February 2019 evaluated the antibacterial effect and microhardness of conventional GIC containing antibiotics in different combinations. Group I (only GIC), Group II (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole+Minocycline), Group III (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole+Cefaclor), Group IV (Ciprofloxacin+Metronidazole) were added to powdered GIC (FUJI IX) to obtain 1.5% w/w ratio. The antibacterial activity of set GIC discs was evaluated against Streptococcus mutans using agar-diffusion methods and microhardness was evaluated using vicker’s microhardness test. ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey multiple-range test was used to determine significant differences.
Results: The results showed that antibacterial efficacy of Group III (GIC+TAP having Cefaclor) was increased and statistically significant (p<0.001) while the results of microhardness test of the same group were also higher.
Conclusion: Current study shows, greater antibacterial and microhardness results with TAP containing cefaclor mixed in GIC. |
topic |
atraumatic restorations physical strength streptococcus mutans |
url |
https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/13609/43918_F(SL)_CE[Ra1]_(SL)_PF1(AJ_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pradnyaramkrishnachaudhari comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement AT ndshashikiran comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement AT savitahadkar comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement AT sachingugawad comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement AT namratagaonkar comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement AT swapniltaur comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement AT ankitamaurya comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement AT shreyabapat comparativeevaluationofantibacterialefficacyandmicrohardnessafteraddingdifferentcombinationsoftripleantibioticpowderinconventionalrestorativeglassionomercement |
_version_ |
1724904804312940544 |