Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA
Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed q...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art11/ |
id |
doaj-cb1bbbb63ce749be8263dbf677a47eba |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cb1bbbb63ce749be8263dbf677a47eba2020-11-24T21:17:46ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872013-12-011841110.5751/ES-05636-1804115636Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USACameron Childs0Abigail M. York1Dave White2Michael L. Schoon3Gitanjali S. Bodner4School of Sustainability, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Community Resources and Development, Decision Center for a Desert City, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Sustainability, Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State UniversityThe Nature Conservancy, Tucson, ArizonaAdaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art11/adaptive comanagementAgua Fria watershedArizonagovernance networkqualitative research |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cameron Childs Abigail M. York Dave White Michael L. Schoon Gitanjali S. Bodner |
spellingShingle |
Cameron Childs Abigail M. York Dave White Michael L. Schoon Gitanjali S. Bodner Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA Ecology and Society adaptive comanagement Agua Fria watershed Arizona governance network qualitative research |
author_facet |
Cameron Childs Abigail M. York Dave White Michael L. Schoon Gitanjali S. Bodner |
author_sort |
Cameron Childs |
title |
Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA |
title_short |
Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA |
title_full |
Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA |
title_fullStr |
Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA |
title_sort |
navigating a murky adaptive comanagement governance network: agua fria watershed, arizona, usa |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
series |
Ecology and Society |
issn |
1708-3087 |
publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
description |
Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment. |
topic |
adaptive comanagement Agua Fria watershed Arizona governance network qualitative research |
url |
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art11/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cameronchilds navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa AT abigailmyork navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa AT davewhite navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa AT michaellschoon navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa AT gitanjalisbodner navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa |
_version_ |
1716740174122057728 |