Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA

Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cameron Childs, Abigail M. York, Dave White, Michael L. Schoon, Gitanjali S. Bodner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2013-12-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art11/
id doaj-cb1bbbb63ce749be8263dbf677a47eba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb1bbbb63ce749be8263dbf677a47eba2020-11-24T21:17:46ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872013-12-011841110.5751/ES-05636-1804115636Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USACameron Childs0Abigail M. York1Dave White2Michael L. Schoon3Gitanjali S. Bodner4School of Sustainability, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Community Resources and Development, Decision Center for a Desert City, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Sustainability, Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State UniversityThe Nature Conservancy, Tucson, ArizonaAdaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art11/adaptive comanagementAgua Fria watershedArizonagovernance networkqualitative research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cameron Childs
Abigail M. York
Dave White
Michael L. Schoon
Gitanjali S. Bodner
spellingShingle Cameron Childs
Abigail M. York
Dave White
Michael L. Schoon
Gitanjali S. Bodner
Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA
Ecology and Society
adaptive comanagement
Agua Fria watershed
Arizona
governance network
qualitative research
author_facet Cameron Childs
Abigail M. York
Dave White
Michael L. Schoon
Gitanjali S. Bodner
author_sort Cameron Childs
title Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA
title_short Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA
title_full Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA
title_fullStr Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA
title_full_unstemmed Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA
title_sort navigating a murky adaptive comanagement governance network: agua fria watershed, arizona, usa
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Adaptive comanagement endeavors to increase knowledge and responsiveness in the face of uncertainty and complexity. However, when collaboration between agency and nonagency stakeholders is mandated, rigid institutions may hinder participation and ecological outcomes. In this case study we analyzed qualitative data to understand how participants perceive strengths and challenges within an emerging adaptive comanagement in the Agua Fria Watershed in Arizona, USA that utilizes insight and personnel from a long-enduring comanagement project, Las Cienegas. Our work demonstrates that general lessons and approaches from one project may be transferable, but particular institutions, management structures, or projects must be place-specific. As public agencies establish and expand governance networks throughout the western United States, our case study has shed light on how to maintain a shared vision and momentum within an inherently murky and shared decision-making environment.
topic adaptive comanagement
Agua Fria watershed
Arizona
governance network
qualitative research
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art11/
work_keys_str_mv AT cameronchilds navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa
AT abigailmyork navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa
AT davewhite navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa
AT michaellschoon navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa
AT gitanjalisbodner navigatingamurkyadaptivecomanagementgovernancenetworkaguafriawatershedarizonausa
_version_ 1716740174122057728