The Improved Value-at-Risk for Heteroscedastic Processes and Their Coverage Probability
A risk measure commonly used in financial risk management, namely, Value-at-Risk (VaR), is studied. In particular, we find a VaR forecast for heteroscedastic processes such that its (conditional) coverage probability is close to the nominal. To do so, we pay attention to the effect of estimator vari...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Probability and Statistics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7638517 |
id |
doaj-cb18aa33901048f69cd982fbd4dbdd7f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cb18aa33901048f69cd982fbd4dbdd7f2020-11-25T02:17:50ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Probability and Statistics1687-952X1687-95382020-01-01202010.1155/2020/76385177638517The Improved Value-at-Risk for Heteroscedastic Processes and Their Coverage ProbabilityKhreshna Syuhada0Statistics Research Division, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jalan Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, IndonesiaA risk measure commonly used in financial risk management, namely, Value-at-Risk (VaR), is studied. In particular, we find a VaR forecast for heteroscedastic processes such that its (conditional) coverage probability is close to the nominal. To do so, we pay attention to the effect of estimator variability such as asymptotic bias and mean square error. Numerical analysis is carried out to illustrate this calculation for the Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (ARCH) model, an observable volatility type model. In comparison, we find VaR for the latent volatility model i.e., the Stochastic Volatility Autoregressive (SVAR) model. It is found that the effect of estimator variability is significant to obtain VaR forecast with better coverage. In addition, we may only be able to assess unconditional coverage probability for VaR forecast of the SVAR model. This is due to the fact that the volatility process of the model is unobservable.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7638517 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Khreshna Syuhada |
spellingShingle |
Khreshna Syuhada The Improved Value-at-Risk for Heteroscedastic Processes and Their Coverage Probability Journal of Probability and Statistics |
author_facet |
Khreshna Syuhada |
author_sort |
Khreshna Syuhada |
title |
The Improved Value-at-Risk for Heteroscedastic Processes and Their Coverage Probability |
title_short |
The Improved Value-at-Risk for Heteroscedastic Processes and Their Coverage Probability |
title_full |
The Improved Value-at-Risk for Heteroscedastic Processes and Their Coverage Probability |
title_fullStr |
The Improved Value-at-Risk for Heteroscedastic Processes and Their Coverage Probability |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Improved Value-at-Risk for Heteroscedastic Processes and Their Coverage Probability |
title_sort |
improved value-at-risk for heteroscedastic processes and their coverage probability |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Probability and Statistics |
issn |
1687-952X 1687-9538 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
A risk measure commonly used in financial risk management, namely, Value-at-Risk (VaR), is studied. In particular, we find a VaR forecast for heteroscedastic processes such that its (conditional) coverage probability is close to the nominal. To do so, we pay attention to the effect of estimator variability such as asymptotic bias and mean square error. Numerical analysis is carried out to illustrate this calculation for the Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (ARCH) model, an observable volatility type model. In comparison, we find VaR for the latent volatility model i.e., the Stochastic Volatility Autoregressive (SVAR) model. It is found that the effect of estimator variability is significant to obtain VaR forecast with better coverage. In addition, we may only be able to assess unconditional coverage probability for VaR forecast of the SVAR model. This is due to the fact that the volatility process of the model is unobservable. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7638517 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT khreshnasyuhada theimprovedvalueatriskforheteroscedasticprocessesandtheircoverageprobability AT khreshnasyuhada improvedvalueatriskforheteroscedasticprocessesandtheircoverageprobability |
_version_ |
1715521782451011584 |