The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal tumors that account for approximately 1% of all adult malignancies. They can arise throughout the body due to their mesenchymal origin, although 60% of all STS occur in the extremities. Locally advanced STS can lead to signific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harati Kamran, Lehnhardt Marcus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2017-12-01
Series:Innovative Surgical Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2017-0043
id doaj-cb03a3632bd2438fa3ad4ce7301d4c47
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cb03a3632bd2438fa3ad4ce7301d4c472021-09-05T20:51:11ZengDe GruyterInnovative Surgical Science2364-74852017-12-012416517010.1515/iss-2017-0043iss-2017-0043The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resectionHarati Kamran0Lehnhardt Marcus1Department of Plastic Surgery, BG-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, GermanyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, BG-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, GermanySoft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal tumors that account for approximately 1% of all adult malignancies. They can arise throughout the body due to their mesenchymal origin, although 60% of all STS occur in the extremities. Locally advanced STS can lead to significant functional morbidity and tend to local recurrences despite surgical resection. About 30% of all STS patients develop distant metastases with a median overall survival of less than 15 months. The treatment of choice in patients with localized disease is still surgical resection with negative margins. However, there has been a paradigm shift in the last few decades. Large retrospective analyses could not establish a strong association between radical resections and improved local control or survival. Previous radical concepts in STS surgery have been gradually replaced by more moderate approaches with function- and limb-sparing resections combined with radiotherapy. Here, the margin status appears to be of prognostic significance. However, several large retrospective analyses have presented inconsistent results, questioning the independent prognostic impact of surgical margins. This article reviews the literature critically, focusing on the changing role of surgical margins in STS surgery.https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2017-0043marginsrecurrencesoft tissue sarcomasurvivalwidth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harati Kamran
Lehnhardt Marcus
spellingShingle Harati Kamran
Lehnhardt Marcus
The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection
Innovative Surgical Science
margins
recurrence
soft tissue sarcoma
survival
width
author_facet Harati Kamran
Lehnhardt Marcus
author_sort Harati Kamran
title The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection
title_short The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection
title_full The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection
title_fullStr The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection
title_full_unstemmed The changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection
title_sort changing paradigm of resection margins in sarcoma resection
publisher De Gruyter
series Innovative Surgical Science
issn 2364-7485
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal tumors that account for approximately 1% of all adult malignancies. They can arise throughout the body due to their mesenchymal origin, although 60% of all STS occur in the extremities. Locally advanced STS can lead to significant functional morbidity and tend to local recurrences despite surgical resection. About 30% of all STS patients develop distant metastases with a median overall survival of less than 15 months. The treatment of choice in patients with localized disease is still surgical resection with negative margins. However, there has been a paradigm shift in the last few decades. Large retrospective analyses could not establish a strong association between radical resections and improved local control or survival. Previous radical concepts in STS surgery have been gradually replaced by more moderate approaches with function- and limb-sparing resections combined with radiotherapy. Here, the margin status appears to be of prognostic significance. However, several large retrospective analyses have presented inconsistent results, questioning the independent prognostic impact of surgical margins. This article reviews the literature critically, focusing on the changing role of surgical margins in STS surgery.
topic margins
recurrence
soft tissue sarcoma
survival
width
url https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2017-0043
work_keys_str_mv AT haratikamran thechangingparadigmofresectionmarginsinsarcomaresection
AT lehnhardtmarcus thechangingparadigmofresectionmarginsinsarcomaresection
AT haratikamran changingparadigmofresectionmarginsinsarcomaresection
AT lehnhardtmarcus changingparadigmofresectionmarginsinsarcomaresection
_version_ 1717784138494246912