Tracking and Comparing Self-Determined Motivation in Elite Youth Soccer: Influence of Developmental Activities, Age, and Skill

Purpose: Our aim was to determine if self-determined motivation (SDM) in elite, men’s soccer changes over time and differs as a function of age, skill-grouping, and engagement in soccer play and practice. We tested predictions from the Developmental Model of Sport Participation (DMSP) regarding rela...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David T. Hendry, Peter R. E. Crocker, A. Mark Williams, Nicola J. Hodges
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00304/full
id doaj-caece57075e74e3289c2f7f8f8172f76
record_format Article
spelling doaj-caece57075e74e3289c2f7f8f8172f762020-11-25T00:05:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-03-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00304415889Tracking and Comparing Self-Determined Motivation in Elite Youth Soccer: Influence of Developmental Activities, Age, and SkillDavid T. Hendry0Peter R. E. Crocker1A. Mark Williams2Nicola J. Hodges3Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United KingdomSchool of Kinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaHealth, Kinesiology, and Recreation, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City UT, United StatesSchool of Kinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaPurpose: Our aim was to determine if self-determined motivation (SDM) in elite, men’s soccer changes over time and differs as a function of age, skill-grouping, and engagement in soccer play and practice. We tested predictions from the Developmental Model of Sport Participation (DMSP) regarding relations between practice and play and SDM among both elite and non-elite samples.Methods: Elite youth soccer players in the United Kingdom (n = 31; from the Under 13/U13 and U15 years age groups) completed practice history and motivation questionnaires at time 1 (T1) and ∼2 years later (T2: now U15 and U17 years). Non-elite players (n = 32; from U15 and U17 years) completed the same questionnaires at T2 only.Results: For the elite groups, global SDM decreased over time for the current U17 group (from U15), but no change was seen for the current U15 group (from U13). Age group differences at T2 mirrored these data, with U17 players showing lower global SDM and higher controlled motivation than U15 elites. The non-elite players did not show age group differences, but elites scored higher for global SDM and autonomous motivation than non-elites. The recent hours accumulated in practice negatively correlated with global SDM in elite and non-elite groups, but play was unrelated to measures of motivation.Conclusion: Differences in SDM as a function of age and skill point toward the dynamic nature of these motivations over time, likely a result of proximity to external rewards related to professional status. Although high volumes of practice are related to lower global SDM in both skill groups, the absence of any relations between SDM and soccer play does not support a key prediction related to the DMSP.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00304/fullexpertisesportstalent identificationdeliberate practiceplay
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David T. Hendry
Peter R. E. Crocker
A. Mark Williams
Nicola J. Hodges
spellingShingle David T. Hendry
Peter R. E. Crocker
A. Mark Williams
Nicola J. Hodges
Tracking and Comparing Self-Determined Motivation in Elite Youth Soccer: Influence of Developmental Activities, Age, and Skill
Frontiers in Psychology
expertise
sports
talent identification
deliberate practice
play
author_facet David T. Hendry
Peter R. E. Crocker
A. Mark Williams
Nicola J. Hodges
author_sort David T. Hendry
title Tracking and Comparing Self-Determined Motivation in Elite Youth Soccer: Influence of Developmental Activities, Age, and Skill
title_short Tracking and Comparing Self-Determined Motivation in Elite Youth Soccer: Influence of Developmental Activities, Age, and Skill
title_full Tracking and Comparing Self-Determined Motivation in Elite Youth Soccer: Influence of Developmental Activities, Age, and Skill
title_fullStr Tracking and Comparing Self-Determined Motivation in Elite Youth Soccer: Influence of Developmental Activities, Age, and Skill
title_full_unstemmed Tracking and Comparing Self-Determined Motivation in Elite Youth Soccer: Influence of Developmental Activities, Age, and Skill
title_sort tracking and comparing self-determined motivation in elite youth soccer: influence of developmental activities, age, and skill
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Purpose: Our aim was to determine if self-determined motivation (SDM) in elite, men’s soccer changes over time and differs as a function of age, skill-grouping, and engagement in soccer play and practice. We tested predictions from the Developmental Model of Sport Participation (DMSP) regarding relations between practice and play and SDM among both elite and non-elite samples.Methods: Elite youth soccer players in the United Kingdom (n = 31; from the Under 13/U13 and U15 years age groups) completed practice history and motivation questionnaires at time 1 (T1) and ∼2 years later (T2: now U15 and U17 years). Non-elite players (n = 32; from U15 and U17 years) completed the same questionnaires at T2 only.Results: For the elite groups, global SDM decreased over time for the current U17 group (from U15), but no change was seen for the current U15 group (from U13). Age group differences at T2 mirrored these data, with U17 players showing lower global SDM and higher controlled motivation than U15 elites. The non-elite players did not show age group differences, but elites scored higher for global SDM and autonomous motivation than non-elites. The recent hours accumulated in practice negatively correlated with global SDM in elite and non-elite groups, but play was unrelated to measures of motivation.Conclusion: Differences in SDM as a function of age and skill point toward the dynamic nature of these motivations over time, likely a result of proximity to external rewards related to professional status. Although high volumes of practice are related to lower global SDM in both skill groups, the absence of any relations between SDM and soccer play does not support a key prediction related to the DMSP.
topic expertise
sports
talent identification
deliberate practice
play
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00304/full
work_keys_str_mv AT davidthendry trackingandcomparingselfdeterminedmotivationineliteyouthsoccerinfluenceofdevelopmentalactivitiesageandskill
AT peterrecrocker trackingandcomparingselfdeterminedmotivationineliteyouthsoccerinfluenceofdevelopmentalactivitiesageandskill
AT amarkwilliams trackingandcomparingselfdeterminedmotivationineliteyouthsoccerinfluenceofdevelopmentalactivitiesageandskill
AT nicolajhodges trackingandcomparingselfdeterminedmotivationineliteyouthsoccerinfluenceofdevelopmentalactivitiesageandskill
_version_ 1725426565054988288