Designing a new paradigm for evaluating Iranian medical record departments

Introduction: According the studies that revealed the absence of specific and applied appropriate standards related to medical records, incompatibility of medical record departments with standards are prevalent, and also according consensus opinions of Iranian experts -wide universities of medical s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R Safdari, Z Meidani, A Hajavi, M Ghazi Saeedi, R Sharifian
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2007-04-01
Series:مدیریت سلامت
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-69-en.html
id doaj-cae4cccec456401db489c3e2e5ec6063
record_format Article
spelling doaj-cae4cccec456401db489c3e2e5ec60632020-11-25T00:47:19ZfasIran University of Medical Sciencesمدیریت سلامت2008-12002008-12192007-04-0110271926Designing a new paradigm for evaluating Iranian medical record departmentsR Safdari0Z Meidani1A Hajavi2M Ghazi Saeedi3R Sharifian4 Introduction: According the studies that revealed the absence of specific and applied appropriate standards related to medical records, incompatibility of medical record departments with standards are prevalent, and also according consensus opinions of Iranian experts -wide universities of medical sciences on medical records activities, conducting a research on determining, confirming, and approving medical records standards and finding an evaluation mechanism and appropriate tools according to pioneer countries and through the national appears to be necessary. Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, we collected performance standards, evaluation mechanisms, and evaluation checklist for health information (medical record) of USA, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Lebanon, Zambia, and Southern Africa through the email, literature review, Fax and Internet. Also we asked views of faculty members of medical record departments in 17 Iranian universities and Health Deputy experts about evaluation of medical record departments through a questionnaire related to proposed model (2005- 2006). Results: Our findings showed that maximum agreements were focused on staffing and directing standards (66/7%). Staff development and education standards accounted for the minimum agreements (52/67%). More than 50% of experts believed that the current evaluation system is not desired and 99% were agreed on developing special sub- committees. Nearly all of experts (96/9%) agreed on adopting self-assessment process before on-site survey. Conclusion: Consensus of some medical records experts and faculty members to proposed model for medical records evaluation standards -despite availability of medical record standards determined by Iran Ministry of Health- should be attributed to shortcoming in available standards, evaluation mechanisms, and evaluation checklist.http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-69-en.htmlModelEvaluationMedical recordMedical sciences universitiesIran.
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R Safdari
Z Meidani
A Hajavi
M Ghazi Saeedi
R Sharifian
spellingShingle R Safdari
Z Meidani
A Hajavi
M Ghazi Saeedi
R Sharifian
Designing a new paradigm for evaluating Iranian medical record departments
مدیریت سلامت
Model
Evaluation
Medical record
Medical sciences universities
Iran.
author_facet R Safdari
Z Meidani
A Hajavi
M Ghazi Saeedi
R Sharifian
author_sort R Safdari
title Designing a new paradigm for evaluating Iranian medical record departments
title_short Designing a new paradigm for evaluating Iranian medical record departments
title_full Designing a new paradigm for evaluating Iranian medical record departments
title_fullStr Designing a new paradigm for evaluating Iranian medical record departments
title_full_unstemmed Designing a new paradigm for evaluating Iranian medical record departments
title_sort designing a new paradigm for evaluating iranian medical record departments
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series مدیریت سلامت
issn 2008-1200
2008-1219
publishDate 2007-04-01
description Introduction: According the studies that revealed the absence of specific and applied appropriate standards related to medical records, incompatibility of medical record departments with standards are prevalent, and also according consensus opinions of Iranian experts -wide universities of medical sciences on medical records activities, conducting a research on determining, confirming, and approving medical records standards and finding an evaluation mechanism and appropriate tools according to pioneer countries and through the national appears to be necessary. Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, we collected performance standards, evaluation mechanisms, and evaluation checklist for health information (medical record) of USA, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Lebanon, Zambia, and Southern Africa through the email, literature review, Fax and Internet. Also we asked views of faculty members of medical record departments in 17 Iranian universities and Health Deputy experts about evaluation of medical record departments through a questionnaire related to proposed model (2005- 2006). Results: Our findings showed that maximum agreements were focused on staffing and directing standards (66/7%). Staff development and education standards accounted for the minimum agreements (52/67%). More than 50% of experts believed that the current evaluation system is not desired and 99% were agreed on developing special sub- committees. Nearly all of experts (96/9%) agreed on adopting self-assessment process before on-site survey. Conclusion: Consensus of some medical records experts and faculty members to proposed model for medical records evaluation standards -despite availability of medical record standards determined by Iran Ministry of Health- should be attributed to shortcoming in available standards, evaluation mechanisms, and evaluation checklist.
topic Model
Evaluation
Medical record
Medical sciences universities
Iran.
url http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-69-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT rsafdari designinganewparadigmforevaluatingiranianmedicalrecorddepartments
AT zmeidani designinganewparadigmforevaluatingiranianmedicalrecorddepartments
AT ahajavi designinganewparadigmforevaluatingiranianmedicalrecorddepartments
AT mghazisaeedi designinganewparadigmforevaluatingiranianmedicalrecorddepartments
AT rsharifian designinganewparadigmforevaluatingiranianmedicalrecorddepartments
_version_ 1725260650756702208