Critical convergences
Thinking through two objects – a focus group and a photograph – this essay suggests that ethnographic critique is not separate from but constitutive of global health. Social science representations, from data and focus groups to ethnographic descriptions and clinical snapshots, not only analyze, unp...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Edinburgh Library
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Medicine Anthropology Theory |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/4927 |
id |
doaj-cabdf5702cd24d9a9366972571ca5678 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-cabdf5702cd24d9a9366972571ca56782021-04-22T08:40:54ZengUniversity of Edinburgh LibraryMedicine Anthropology Theory2405-691X2019-05-016210.17157/mat.6.2.6414927Critical convergencesRamah McKayThinking through two objects – a focus group and a photograph – this essay suggests that ethnographic critique is not separate from but constitutive of global health. Social science representations, from data and focus groups to ethnographic descriptions and clinical snapshots, not only analyze, unpack, or depict global health; they also constitute it as a field of intervention and to define certain spaces, particularly clinical ones, as exemplary global health sites. This co-constitutive role complicates ethnographic critiques that see their role as primarily destabilizing global health facts. Rather, by drawing on feminist approaches to ethnography and critique, I suggest that convergences between ethnographic and global health knowledge stem from historical alignments through which anthropology and global health alike emerged and have come to circulate. These convergences point to the need for a ‘non-innocent’ critique of global health that centers the disciplinary complicity between, and methodological adjacency of, social science and global health.http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/4927ethnographyglobal healthfeminist theorymaterialismembodiment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ramah McKay |
spellingShingle |
Ramah McKay Critical convergences Medicine Anthropology Theory ethnography global health feminist theory materialism embodiment |
author_facet |
Ramah McKay |
author_sort |
Ramah McKay |
title |
Critical convergences |
title_short |
Critical convergences |
title_full |
Critical convergences |
title_fullStr |
Critical convergences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critical convergences |
title_sort |
critical convergences |
publisher |
University of Edinburgh Library |
series |
Medicine Anthropology Theory |
issn |
2405-691X |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Thinking through two objects – a focus group and a photograph – this essay suggests that ethnographic critique is not separate from but constitutive of global health. Social science representations, from data and focus groups to ethnographic descriptions and clinical snapshots, not only analyze, unpack, or depict global health; they also constitute it as a field of intervention and to define certain spaces, particularly clinical ones, as exemplary global health sites. This co-constitutive role complicates ethnographic critiques that see their role as primarily destabilizing global health facts. Rather, by drawing on feminist approaches to ethnography and critique, I suggest that convergences between ethnographic and global health knowledge stem from historical alignments through which anthropology and global health alike emerged and have come to circulate. These convergences point to the need for a ‘non-innocent’ critique of global health that centers the disciplinary complicity between, and methodological adjacency of, social science and global health. |
topic |
ethnography global health feminist theory materialism embodiment |
url |
http://www.medanthrotheory.org/article/view/4927 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ramahmckay criticalconvergences |
_version_ |
1721514824303640576 |