Evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patients

Background: In a resource-limited setting, use of advanced reconstruction procedures for cleft patient is unaffordable. The autogenous graft sites such as iliac or rib are not favored owing to socio-ethno-economic and cosmetic reasons. In such situations, tibial graft is an excellent alternative. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sadique Hussain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2013;volume=24;issue=6;spage=659;epage=663;aulast=Hussain
id doaj-caacacd1f17640d48f9f7c8d87f69524
record_format Article
spelling doaj-caacacd1f17640d48f9f7c8d87f695242020-11-24T23:52:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032013-01-0124665966310.4103/0970-9290.127604Evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patientsSadique HussainBackground: In a resource-limited setting, use of advanced reconstruction procedures for cleft patient is unaffordable. The autogenous graft sites such as iliac or rib are not favored owing to socio-ethno-economic and cosmetic reasons. In such situations, tibial graft is an excellent alternative. There is limited literature on the use of tibial graft from India and this manuscript attempts to address this lacuna. Materials and Methods: Archives of a single department on cleft palate cases treated with tibial graft were collected. Cases fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. The efficiency of treatment was evaluated from the orthopantomogram (OPG) and/or computed tomogram (CT) imaging using previously described methodology. All the data collected were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results: The mean age of the patients was 17.78 ± 3.29 years with a range of 13-23 years. Three patients had been treated with secondary bone grafting, while the remainder had been treated with tertiary bone grafting. The median age of the study population was 17.39 years, while the mode was 17 years. The mean efficiency in terms of preoperative and post-operative size of defects as measured in OPG was 74.32 ± 7.31, while it was 73.15 ± 9.9 as measured in CT. All the patients were comfortable with closure of the defect. Patients treated with secondary bone grafting had a mean efficiency was 79.53 ± 9.07, while for tertiary grafting, it was 71.72 ± 4.86. Conclusion: The tibial graft offers an excellent alternative to the conventional standard grafts such as iliac crest or rib grafts. The efficiency of the treatment measured at 6 months period on standard OPG or CT is comparable to the results obtained with the rib/iliac crest.http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2013;volume=24;issue=6;spage=659;epage=663;aulast=HussainCleft palatereconstructiontibial graft
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sadique Hussain
spellingShingle Sadique Hussain
Evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patients
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Cleft palate
reconstruction
tibial graft
author_facet Sadique Hussain
author_sort Sadique Hussain
title Evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patients
title_short Evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patients
title_full Evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patients
title_sort evaluation of alveolar grafting with tibial graft in adolescent patients
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Dental Research
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Background: In a resource-limited setting, use of advanced reconstruction procedures for cleft patient is unaffordable. The autogenous graft sites such as iliac or rib are not favored owing to socio-ethno-economic and cosmetic reasons. In such situations, tibial graft is an excellent alternative. There is limited literature on the use of tibial graft from India and this manuscript attempts to address this lacuna. Materials and Methods: Archives of a single department on cleft palate cases treated with tibial graft were collected. Cases fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. The efficiency of treatment was evaluated from the orthopantomogram (OPG) and/or computed tomogram (CT) imaging using previously described methodology. All the data collected were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results: The mean age of the patients was 17.78 ± 3.29 years with a range of 13-23 years. Three patients had been treated with secondary bone grafting, while the remainder had been treated with tertiary bone grafting. The median age of the study population was 17.39 years, while the mode was 17 years. The mean efficiency in terms of preoperative and post-operative size of defects as measured in OPG was 74.32 ± 7.31, while it was 73.15 ± 9.9 as measured in CT. All the patients were comfortable with closure of the defect. Patients treated with secondary bone grafting had a mean efficiency was 79.53 ± 9.07, while for tertiary grafting, it was 71.72 ± 4.86. Conclusion: The tibial graft offers an excellent alternative to the conventional standard grafts such as iliac crest or rib grafts. The efficiency of the treatment measured at 6 months period on standard OPG or CT is comparable to the results obtained with the rib/iliac crest.
topic Cleft palate
reconstruction
tibial graft
url http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2013;volume=24;issue=6;spage=659;epage=663;aulast=Hussain
work_keys_str_mv AT sadiquehussain evaluationofalveolargraftingwithtibialgraftinadolescentpatients
_version_ 1725471947536465920