Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano
There is an analogy between two types of liminality: the geographic or cultural ‘outside’ space of the Marrano Jew, alienated from his/her original religion and the one he or she has been forced to adopt, and, a philosophical position that is outside of both Athens and Jerusalem. Derrida finds and r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/2/68 |
id |
doaj-caac73bbab614cf193e571bd4ba91f71 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-caac73bbab614cf193e571bd4ba91f712020-11-24T21:59:54ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-01-011026810.3390/rel10020068rel10020068Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical MarranoEmilie Kutash0Philosophy Department, Salem State University, Salem, MA 01970, USAThere is an analogy between two types of liminality: the geographic or cultural ‘outside’ space of the Marrano Jew, alienated from his/her original religion and the one he or she has been forced to adopt, and, a philosophical position that is outside of both Athens and Jerusalem. Derrida finds and re-finds ‘h’ors- texte’, an ‘internal desert’, a ‘secret’ outside place: alien to both the western philosophical tradition and the Hebraic archive. In this liminal space he questions the otherness of the French language to which he was acculturated, and, in a turn to a less discursive modality, autobiography, finds, in the words of Helene Cixous, “the Jew-who-doesn’t know-that-he-is”. Derrida’s galut (exile) is neither Hebrew nor Greek. It is a private place outside of all discourse, which he claims, is inevitably ethnocentric. In inhabiting this outside space, he exercises the prerogative of a Marrano, equipped to critique the French language of his acculturation and the western philosophy of the scholars. French and Hebrew are irreconcilable binaries, western philosophy and his Hebrew legacy is as well. These issues will be discussed in this paper with reference to <i>Monolingualism of the Other</i> and <i>Archive Fever</i> as they augment some of his earlier work, <i>Writing and Difference</i> and <i>Speech and Phenomena</i>.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/2/68Derridaphilosophical MarranoliminalarchiveHebrewGreekMonolingualism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emilie Kutash |
spellingShingle |
Emilie Kutash Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano Religions Derrida philosophical Marrano liminal archive Hebrew Greek Monolingualism |
author_facet |
Emilie Kutash |
author_sort |
Emilie Kutash |
title |
Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano |
title_short |
Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano |
title_full |
Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano |
title_fullStr |
Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano |
title_full_unstemmed |
Jacques Derrida: The Double Liminality of a Philosophical Marrano |
title_sort |
jacques derrida: the double liminality of a philosophical marrano |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
There is an analogy between two types of liminality: the geographic or cultural ‘outside’ space of the Marrano Jew, alienated from his/her original religion and the one he or she has been forced to adopt, and, a philosophical position that is outside of both Athens and Jerusalem. Derrida finds and re-finds ‘h’ors- texte’, an ‘internal desert’, a ‘secret’ outside place: alien to both the western philosophical tradition and the Hebraic archive. In this liminal space he questions the otherness of the French language to which he was acculturated, and, in a turn to a less discursive modality, autobiography, finds, in the words of Helene Cixous, “the Jew-who-doesn’t know-that-he-is”. Derrida’s galut (exile) is neither Hebrew nor Greek. It is a private place outside of all discourse, which he claims, is inevitably ethnocentric. In inhabiting this outside space, he exercises the prerogative of a Marrano, equipped to critique the French language of his acculturation and the western philosophy of the scholars. French and Hebrew are irreconcilable binaries, western philosophy and his Hebrew legacy is as well. These issues will be discussed in this paper with reference to <i>Monolingualism of the Other</i> and <i>Archive Fever</i> as they augment some of his earlier work, <i>Writing and Difference</i> and <i>Speech and Phenomena</i>. |
topic |
Derrida philosophical Marrano liminal archive Hebrew Greek Monolingualism |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/2/68 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emiliekutash jacquesderridathedoubleliminalityofaphilosophicalmarrano |
_version_ |
1725846657767047168 |