Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (LMA Flexible) is known to be more difficult than that of a conventional laryngeal mask airway. The 90° rotation technique can improve the success rate with a conventional laryngeal mask airway but its effect with the LMA Flexible rem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bon-Wook Koo, Ah-Young Oh, Jung-Won Hwang, Hyo-Seok Na, Seong-Won Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-019-0773-z
id doaj-ca937975d9c64c78b8b8f9ef3ec8ae22
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca937975d9c64c78b8b8f9ef3ec8ae222020-11-25T03:59:42ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532019-06-011911610.1186/s12871-019-0773-zComparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trialBon-Wook Koo0Ah-Young Oh1Jung-Won Hwang2Hyo-Seok Na3Seong-Won Min4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of MedicineAbstract Background Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (LMA Flexible) is known to be more difficult than that of a conventional laryngeal mask airway. The 90° rotation technique can improve the success rate with a conventional laryngeal mask airway but its effect with the LMA Flexible remains unknown. We assessed whether the 90° rotation technique increased the first-attempt success rate of LMA Flexible insertion versus the standard technique. Methods In total, 129 female patients undergoing breast surgery were analyzed. The primary endpoint was success at the first attempt. The insertion time, number of trials, number of manipulations required, and oropharyngeal leak pressure were also evaluated. Heart rate and mean blood pressure were recorded 1 min before and 1 min after insertion. Blood staining on the LMA Flexible after removal and postoperative sore throat were checked. Results The first-attempt success rates were comparable between the groups (93% vs. 98.3%, P = .20). The insertion time, number of trials and manipulations, hemodynamic variables, and complications, such as blood staining and sore throat, did not differ between the groups. Conclusions The 90° rotation technique is a good alternative to the standard technique for insertion of the LMA Flexible. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03028896). It was registered retrospectively at Jan 19th, 2017.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-019-0773-zLMA flexible
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bon-Wook Koo
Ah-Young Oh
Jung-Won Hwang
Hyo-Seok Na
Seong-Won Min
spellingShingle Bon-Wook Koo
Ah-Young Oh
Jung-Won Hwang
Hyo-Seok Na
Seong-Won Min
Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial
BMC Anesthesiology
LMA flexible
author_facet Bon-Wook Koo
Ah-Young Oh
Jung-Won Hwang
Hyo-Seok Na
Seong-Won Min
author_sort Bon-Wook Koo
title Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for LMA Flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of standard versus 90° rotation technique for lma flexible™ insertion: a randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Anesthesiology
issn 1471-2253
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Insertion of a flexible laryngeal mask airway (LMA Flexible) is known to be more difficult than that of a conventional laryngeal mask airway. The 90° rotation technique can improve the success rate with a conventional laryngeal mask airway but its effect with the LMA Flexible remains unknown. We assessed whether the 90° rotation technique increased the first-attempt success rate of LMA Flexible insertion versus the standard technique. Methods In total, 129 female patients undergoing breast surgery were analyzed. The primary endpoint was success at the first attempt. The insertion time, number of trials, number of manipulations required, and oropharyngeal leak pressure were also evaluated. Heart rate and mean blood pressure were recorded 1 min before and 1 min after insertion. Blood staining on the LMA Flexible after removal and postoperative sore throat were checked. Results The first-attempt success rates were comparable between the groups (93% vs. 98.3%, P = .20). The insertion time, number of trials and manipulations, hemodynamic variables, and complications, such as blood staining and sore throat, did not differ between the groups. Conclusions The 90° rotation technique is a good alternative to the standard technique for insertion of the LMA Flexible. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03028896). It was registered retrospectively at Jan 19th, 2017.
topic LMA flexible
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-019-0773-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bonwookkoo comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahyoungoh comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jungwonhwang comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hyoseokna comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT seongwonmin comparisonofstandardversus90rotationtechniqueforlmaflexibleinsertionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724453387146100736