SDG 5 and the Gender Gap in Standardization: Empirical Evidence From Germany

Whereas (technical) standards often affect society as a whole, they are mostly developed by men. [d=ph]In the context of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 5 (gender equality), this [d=ph]article motivates research on the gender gap in standardization, focusing in a first step on the u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Philipp Heß
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8699
id doaj-ca87a5f338df464c813affaf59450383
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca87a5f338df464c813affaf594503832020-11-25T03:53:05ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-10-01128699869910.3390/su12208699SDG 5 and the Gender Gap in Standardization: Empirical Evidence From GermanyPhilipp Heß0Chair of Innovation Economics, Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin), 10587 Berlin, GermanyWhereas (technical) standards often affect society as a whole, they are mostly developed by men. [d=ph]In the context of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 5 (gender equality), this [d=ph]article motivates research on the gender gap in standardization, focusing in a first step on the under-representation of women in [d=ph]science, technology, engineering, mathematics and leadership positions as one possible cause. A novel data set of more than 8000 organizations that develop formal standards and 28,000 affiliated experts (10.5% female) confirms that women are descriptively under-represented. A logistic regression shows that organizations’ size, industry, and geographical location are significant factors that are associated with representation by female standardizers. Standard-development for construction, mechanical and electrical engineering is especially male-dominated, while the east of Germany shows more female representation than the west. The presented empirical evidence of female under-representation suggests a need for standard-setting organizations to expand their focus from considering gender in standards documents to actively promoting female participation in their committees. It further adds to the debate on stakeholder representation in standardization and its legitimacy as a co-regulative system in the EU.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8699standardizationlegitimacygender gapgender equalitysustainable development goals
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philipp Heß
spellingShingle Philipp Heß
SDG 5 and the Gender Gap in Standardization: Empirical Evidence From Germany
Sustainability
standardization
legitimacy
gender gap
gender equality
sustainable development goals
author_facet Philipp Heß
author_sort Philipp Heß
title SDG 5 and the Gender Gap in Standardization: Empirical Evidence From Germany
title_short SDG 5 and the Gender Gap in Standardization: Empirical Evidence From Germany
title_full SDG 5 and the Gender Gap in Standardization: Empirical Evidence From Germany
title_fullStr SDG 5 and the Gender Gap in Standardization: Empirical Evidence From Germany
title_full_unstemmed SDG 5 and the Gender Gap in Standardization: Empirical Evidence From Germany
title_sort sdg 5 and the gender gap in standardization: empirical evidence from germany
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Whereas (technical) standards often affect society as a whole, they are mostly developed by men. [d=ph]In the context of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 5 (gender equality), this [d=ph]article motivates research on the gender gap in standardization, focusing in a first step on the under-representation of women in [d=ph]science, technology, engineering, mathematics and leadership positions as one possible cause. A novel data set of more than 8000 organizations that develop formal standards and 28,000 affiliated experts (10.5% female) confirms that women are descriptively under-represented. A logistic regression shows that organizations’ size, industry, and geographical location are significant factors that are associated with representation by female standardizers. Standard-development for construction, mechanical and electrical engineering is especially male-dominated, while the east of Germany shows more female representation than the west. The presented empirical evidence of female under-representation suggests a need for standard-setting organizations to expand their focus from considering gender in standards documents to actively promoting female participation in their committees. It further adds to the debate on stakeholder representation in standardization and its legitimacy as a co-regulative system in the EU.
topic standardization
legitimacy
gender gap
gender equality
sustainable development goals
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8699
work_keys_str_mv AT philippheß sdg5andthegendergapinstandardizationempiricalevidencefromgermany
_version_ 1724480003500933120