Theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in ZnO

Abstract The $$s,p{-}d$$ s , p - d exchange coupling between the spins of band carriers and of transition metal (TM) dopants ranging from Ti to Cu in ZnO is studied within the density functional theory. The $$+U$$ + U corrections are included to reproduce the experimental ZnO band gap and the dopant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Ciechan, Piotr Bogusławski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83258-1
id doaj-ca7fb163d5434c7e8d90f774cfab10a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca7fb163d5434c7e8d90f774cfab10a52021-02-21T12:34:08ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-0111111110.1038/s41598-021-83258-1Theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in ZnOAnna Ciechan0Piotr Bogusławski1Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of SciencesInstitute of Physics, Polish Academy of SciencesAbstract The $$s,p{-}d$$ s , p - d exchange coupling between the spins of band carriers and of transition metal (TM) dopants ranging from Ti to Cu in ZnO is studied within the density functional theory. The $$+U$$ + U corrections are included to reproduce the experimental ZnO band gap and the dopant levels. The p–d coupling reveals unexpectedly complex features. In particular, (i) the p–d coupling constants $$N_0\beta$$ N 0 β vary about 10 times when going from V to Ni, (ii) not only the value but also the sign of $$N_0\beta$$ N 0 β depends on the charge state of the dopant, (iii) the p–d coupling with the heavy holes and the light holes is not the same; in the case of Fe, Co and Ni, $$N_0\beta$$ N 0 β s for the two subbands can differ twice, and for Cu the opposite sign of the coupling is found for light and heavy holes. The main features of the p–d coupling are determined by the p–d hybridization between the d(TM) and p(O) orbitals. In contrast, the s–d coupling constant $$N_0\alpha$$ N 0 α is almost the same for all TM ions, and does not depend on the charge state of the dopant. The TM-induced spin polarization of the p(O) orbitals contributes to the s–d coupling, enhancing $$N_0\alpha$$ N 0 α .https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83258-1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Ciechan
Piotr Bogusławski
spellingShingle Anna Ciechan
Piotr Bogusławski
Theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in ZnO
Scientific Reports
author_facet Anna Ciechan
Piotr Bogusławski
author_sort Anna Ciechan
title Theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in ZnO
title_short Theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in ZnO
title_full Theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in ZnO
title_fullStr Theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in ZnO
title_full_unstemmed Theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in ZnO
title_sort theory of the sp–d coupling of transition metal impurities with free carriers in zno
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract The $$s,p{-}d$$ s , p - d exchange coupling between the spins of band carriers and of transition metal (TM) dopants ranging from Ti to Cu in ZnO is studied within the density functional theory. The $$+U$$ + U corrections are included to reproduce the experimental ZnO band gap and the dopant levels. The p–d coupling reveals unexpectedly complex features. In particular, (i) the p–d coupling constants $$N_0\beta$$ N 0 β vary about 10 times when going from V to Ni, (ii) not only the value but also the sign of $$N_0\beta$$ N 0 β depends on the charge state of the dopant, (iii) the p–d coupling with the heavy holes and the light holes is not the same; in the case of Fe, Co and Ni, $$N_0\beta$$ N 0 β s for the two subbands can differ twice, and for Cu the opposite sign of the coupling is found for light and heavy holes. The main features of the p–d coupling are determined by the p–d hybridization between the d(TM) and p(O) orbitals. In contrast, the s–d coupling constant $$N_0\alpha$$ N 0 α is almost the same for all TM ions, and does not depend on the charge state of the dopant. The TM-induced spin polarization of the p(O) orbitals contributes to the s–d coupling, enhancing $$N_0\alpha$$ N 0 α .
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83258-1
work_keys_str_mv AT annaciechan theoryofthespdcouplingoftransitionmetalimpuritieswithfreecarriersinzno
AT piotrbogusławski theoryofthespdcouplingoftransitionmetalimpuritieswithfreecarriersinzno
_version_ 1724257966528397312