La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele

The question of the mimesis metaphorike in Aristotle is developed, in the interpretative perspective of this work, through an itinerary that defines it in relation to poetical thought, ontology and in its gnoseological and epistemological aspects. The pages that the philosopher has explicitly dedica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Graziella Travaglini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rosenberg & Sellier 2009-01-01
Series:Rivista di Estetica
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1897
id doaj-ca750c146233447bb3374c111df7490d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ca750c146233447bb3374c111df7490d2020-11-24T23:07:47ZengRosenberg & SellierRivista di Estetica0035-62122421-58642009-01-014012114810.4000/estetica.1897La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in AristoteleGraziella TravagliniThe question of the mimesis metaphorike in Aristotle is developed, in the interpretative perspective of this work, through an itinerary that defines it in relation to poetical thought, ontology and in its gnoseological and epistemological aspects. The pages that the philosopher has explicitly dedicated to the metaphor might be considered as examples in a sort of reflection-guide to understand the link existing, according to Aristotle, between language, thought and being. At the same time they offer a fundamental theoretical element to proceed in the search for that unity by analogy that has occupied a great part of the Aristotelian interpretative tradition. The hermeneutical perspective of this work represents a critical position in relation to the most common interpretations of the theory of the metaphor in Aristotle (that explain it in linguistic-semiotic terms) and tries to retrieve and bring to light the metaphysical horizon and the “referentialist” vocation that mark the reflection of the Greek philosopher. Yet, notwithstanding this background, Aristotle’s reflection manages to generate a realism that is not quashed in the opposition object-subject, inner world-outside world, but that is able, even today, to offer fundamental parameters to think of the relationship between language, world and thought in terms that are not any longer those of a world defined through a totalising linguistic dimension. In this sense, the Aristotelian doctrine of the metaphor constitutes today a fundamental theoretical paradigm to think deep and critically the kind of relation that might exist between arts and truth and, also, between language and world.http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1897
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Graziella Travaglini
spellingShingle Graziella Travaglini
La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele
Rivista di Estetica
author_facet Graziella Travaglini
author_sort Graziella Travaglini
title La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele
title_short La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele
title_full La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele
title_fullStr La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele
title_full_unstemmed La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele
title_sort la metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in aristotele
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
series Rivista di Estetica
issn 0035-6212
2421-5864
publishDate 2009-01-01
description The question of the mimesis metaphorike in Aristotle is developed, in the interpretative perspective of this work, through an itinerary that defines it in relation to poetical thought, ontology and in its gnoseological and epistemological aspects. The pages that the philosopher has explicitly dedicated to the metaphor might be considered as examples in a sort of reflection-guide to understand the link existing, according to Aristotle, between language, thought and being. At the same time they offer a fundamental theoretical element to proceed in the search for that unity by analogy that has occupied a great part of the Aristotelian interpretative tradition. The hermeneutical perspective of this work represents a critical position in relation to the most common interpretations of the theory of the metaphor in Aristotle (that explain it in linguistic-semiotic terms) and tries to retrieve and bring to light the metaphysical horizon and the “referentialist” vocation that mark the reflection of the Greek philosopher. Yet, notwithstanding this background, Aristotle’s reflection manages to generate a realism that is not quashed in the opposition object-subject, inner world-outside world, but that is able, even today, to offer fundamental parameters to think of the relationship between language, world and thought in terms that are not any longer those of a world defined through a totalising linguistic dimension. In this sense, the Aristotelian doctrine of the metaphor constitutes today a fundamental theoretical paradigm to think deep and critically the kind of relation that might exist between arts and truth and, also, between language and world.
url http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1897
work_keys_str_mv AT graziellatravaglini lametaforalanalogiaelefiguredeisensiinaristotele
_version_ 1725617059640901632