La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele
The question of the mimesis metaphorike in Aristotle is developed, in the interpretative perspective of this work, through an itinerary that defines it in relation to poetical thought, ontology and in its gnoseological and epistemological aspects. The pages that the philosopher has explicitly dedica...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2009-01-01
|
Series: | Rivista di Estetica |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1897 |
id |
doaj-ca750c146233447bb3374c111df7490d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ca750c146233447bb3374c111df7490d2020-11-24T23:07:47ZengRosenberg & SellierRivista di Estetica0035-62122421-58642009-01-014012114810.4000/estetica.1897La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in AristoteleGraziella TravagliniThe question of the mimesis metaphorike in Aristotle is developed, in the interpretative perspective of this work, through an itinerary that defines it in relation to poetical thought, ontology and in its gnoseological and epistemological aspects. The pages that the philosopher has explicitly dedicated to the metaphor might be considered as examples in a sort of reflection-guide to understand the link existing, according to Aristotle, between language, thought and being. At the same time they offer a fundamental theoretical element to proceed in the search for that unity by analogy that has occupied a great part of the Aristotelian interpretative tradition. The hermeneutical perspective of this work represents a critical position in relation to the most common interpretations of the theory of the metaphor in Aristotle (that explain it in linguistic-semiotic terms) and tries to retrieve and bring to light the metaphysical horizon and the “referentialist” vocation that mark the reflection of the Greek philosopher. Yet, notwithstanding this background, Aristotle’s reflection manages to generate a realism that is not quashed in the opposition object-subject, inner world-outside world, but that is able, even today, to offer fundamental parameters to think of the relationship between language, world and thought in terms that are not any longer those of a world defined through a totalising linguistic dimension. In this sense, the Aristotelian doctrine of the metaphor constitutes today a fundamental theoretical paradigm to think deep and critically the kind of relation that might exist between arts and truth and, also, between language and world.http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1897 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Graziella Travaglini |
spellingShingle |
Graziella Travaglini La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele Rivista di Estetica |
author_facet |
Graziella Travaglini |
author_sort |
Graziella Travaglini |
title |
La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele |
title_short |
La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele |
title_full |
La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele |
title_fullStr |
La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele |
title_full_unstemmed |
La metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in Aristotele |
title_sort |
la metafora, l’analogia e le figure dei sensi in aristotele |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
series |
Rivista di Estetica |
issn |
0035-6212 2421-5864 |
publishDate |
2009-01-01 |
description |
The question of the mimesis metaphorike in Aristotle is developed, in the interpretative perspective of this work, through an itinerary that defines it in relation to poetical thought, ontology and in its gnoseological and epistemological aspects. The pages that the philosopher has explicitly dedicated to the metaphor might be considered as examples in a sort of reflection-guide to understand the link existing, according to Aristotle, between language, thought and being. At the same time they offer a fundamental theoretical element to proceed in the search for that unity by analogy that has occupied a great part of the Aristotelian interpretative tradition. The hermeneutical perspective of this work represents a critical position in relation to the most common interpretations of the theory of the metaphor in Aristotle (that explain it in linguistic-semiotic terms) and tries to retrieve and bring to light the metaphysical horizon and the “referentialist” vocation that mark the reflection of the Greek philosopher. Yet, notwithstanding this background, Aristotle’s reflection manages to generate a realism that is not quashed in the opposition object-subject, inner world-outside world, but that is able, even today, to offer fundamental parameters to think of the relationship between language, world and thought in terms that are not any longer those of a world defined through a totalising linguistic dimension. In this sense, the Aristotelian doctrine of the metaphor constitutes today a fundamental theoretical paradigm to think deep and critically the kind of relation that might exist between arts and truth and, also, between language and world. |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/1897 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT graziellatravaglini lametaforalanalogiaelefiguredeisensiinaristotele |
_version_ |
1725617059640901632 |